Hengyang

Researchers are conducting a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TQB2102 for injection compared to the chemotherapy regimen TCbHP in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The study aims to assess key outcomes including the total physiological complete response (tpCR), breast pathological complete response (bpCR), overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Participants will receive either TQB2102, a HER2 dual-antibody drug conjugate, or the TCbHP chemotherapy combination consisting of Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, Docetaxel, and Carboplatin. Treatment is given before surgery as part of the neoadjuvant approach. The study compares these two treatment regimens to determine their relative effectiveness and safety in this setting. During the study, participants will be monitored for response to treatment and side effects over a period of up to 26 months from the start of the study. Evaluations by an Independent Review Committee will include measuring the rate of total physiological complete response. Additional assessments will track other clinical outcomes and adverse events. Participants must comply with study requirements, including surgery after neoadjuvant therapy if appropriate, and safety will be closely observed throughout the trial.

Researchers are investigating the similarity in pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, effectiveness, safety, and immune response of HLX17 compared to US-sourced Keytruda® in patients who have had surgery for non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, or renal cell carcinoma. This Phase I, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study aims to compare these two treatments in people with these resected solid tumors to better understand their performance and safety profiles. Participants will receive either HLX17 or US-sourced Keytruda®, each given at a dose of 200 mg on the first day of every 3-week cycle. The study is designed with parallel groups, where each participant receives one of the treatments across multiple cycles. The dosing schedule continues through six cycles, and the two treatments are directly compared under controlled conditions. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored closely with various assessments including laboratory tests and evaluations of organ function to ensure safety. The main outcomes measured are drug exposure over time from the first dose to 21 days after the initial and sixth doses. Participants are expected to have a performance status of 0 and a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. Safety and immunogenicity will also be evaluated, with follow-up to monitor any side effects or immune responses during and after treatment.

This trial evaluates the effectiveness and safety of the GR2001 injection compared to Human Tetanus Immunoglobulin (HTIG) for preventing tetanus. It is a Phase III study focused on patients suspected of tetanus exposure through dirty or contaminated wounds. The study aims to assess the immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics of GR2001 as a potential alternative to HTIG. Participants will receive either the GR2001 injection or HTIG on the first day of the study. GR2001 is provided in a 5mg/1ml vial packaged with specialized materials to ensure safety and stability. HTIG is a licensed human tetanus immunoglobulin derived from human plasma and prepared in injectable form. Both treatments are administered once for tetanus prophylaxis. During the study, researchers will measure the increase in anti-tetanus antibody levels up to 12 hours after treatment to evaluate immune response. Participants must provide informed consent and will be monitored for safety and any adverse reactions. The study includes adults aged 18 and older with suspected tetanus exposure, and the overall participation involves initial treatment and short-term antibody measurement for effectiveness.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

This trial studies patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer who have not shown disease progression after concurrent chemoradiation therapy. It is a randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical study designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of the drug AK112 against a placebo as a consolidation treatment. The goal is to evaluate the potential benefits of AK112 in improving outcomes for these patients. Participants receive either AK112 at a dose of 20 mg/kg or a placebo, both administered intravenously every three weeks (Q3W). The treatment is given as consolidation therapy following initial chemoradiation, aiming to maintain disease control. The study involves two groups: one receiving AK112 and the other receiving placebo, with both treatments delivered under double-blind conditions. Throughout the trial, researchers monitor participants for up to approximately six years, focusing on progression-free survival and overall survival as primary outcomes. Patients undergo regular assessments to track disease status and safety, including blinded independent center reviews. The long-term follow-up ensures comprehensive evaluation of treatment effects and participant safety over time.

This research aims to evaluate how well brenipatide (LY3537031) is tolerated, what side effects may occur, and its safety and effectiveness in adults with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D). The study focuses on participants who meet specific IBS-D criteria related to bowel movement patterns and abdominal pain. It is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial lasting approximately 35 weeks. Participants will receive either brenipatide or a placebo, both administered under the skin through subcutaneous injection. The treatments are compared to assess their impact on IBS-D symptoms. The study involves careful monitoring of patients' responses to the medication over the treatment period, with no changes in diet allowed in the four weeks before screening. During the study, participants will track their symptoms daily using an electronic diary, including abdominal pain and stool consistency. Researchers will measure the percentage of days participants have a positive composite response between weeks 9 and 16. Safety and side effects will be monitored throughout the study, ensuring participants are closely observed during the full duration of about 35 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Dostarlimab compared to a placebo in adults with locally advanced unresected Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on patients who have completed chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin and radiation and have no distant metastatic disease. The study requires confirmation of PD-L1 positive tumor status and specific testing for oropharyngeal carcinoma cases. Participants will receive either Dostarlimab or a placebo as an intravenous infusion following their chemoradiation treatment. The study monitors these treatments as sequential therapy to assess their impact on disease progression. Treatments are administered in a controlled, blinded manner to compare outcomes between the two groups effectively. During the study, participants will be followed for up to approximately five years to measure event-free survival, with evaluations conducted by blinded independent central review. Assessments will include monitoring for safety, disease status, and any adverse events throughout the study period. This long-term follow-up aims to provide comprehensive data on the effectiveness and safety of Dostarlimab as post-chemoradiation therapy in this patient population.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of 9MW1911 in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) through a Phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The study focuses on patients aged 40 to 75 years who have a history of moderate to severe COPD exacerbations and moderate-to-severe COPD lung function impairment. This trial aims to compare 9MW1911 to a placebo to better understand its impact on COPD symptoms and exacerbations. Participants will be assigned to receive either intravenous 9MW1911 or a placebo every 28 days. The treatment period lasts 52 weeks, during which the study drug is administered monthly. The trial includes careful monitoring and evaluation of the participants' lung function and health status throughout this time to assess the effects of the treatment. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including lung function tests and monitoring for COPD flare-ups or exacerbations. The primary outcome measured is the annual rate of moderate to severe acute COPD exacerbations over 52 weeks. Safety evaluations and regular health checks will also be conducted to ensure participant well-being. The total duration of participation in the trial is one year, providing comprehensive data on treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of a drug called ICP-248 in adults who have relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, a type of blood cancer. This is a phase 2, single-arm, multi-center, open-label study, focusing on patients whose disease has returned or not responded to previous treatments including anti-CD20 therapies and BTK inhibitors. Participants in this study will receive ICP-248 orally according to the study protocol. The treatment will be administered as a single-arm intervention, meaning all enrolled patients will receive the same drug without comparison to a placebo or other treatment. There is no additional description of dosing schedules or treatment duration provided. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor the overall response rate (ORR) based on the Lugano 2014 criteria, assessed by an independent review committee over a period of three years. Participants will undergo evaluations to measure tumor response and safety. The study includes follow-up assessments to track long-term outcomes and adverse events during and after the treatment period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of subcutaneous anifrolumab compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM), specifically polymyositis (PM) or dermatomyositis (DM). This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study adds anifrolumab or placebo to participants' standard of care treatment to assess overall disease activity. Participants will receive weekly subcutaneous injections of either anifrolumab or placebo for 52 weeks. After this period, all participants will receive open-label anifrolumab injections once weekly for an additional 52 weeks. This design allows researchers to evaluate initial treatment effects and longer-term outcomes with anifrolumab. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly for disease activity and safety. The main outcome measured is the Total Improvement Score (TIS) with a response defined as a score of 40 or higher at 52 weeks. The total study participation lasts up to 104 weeks, including the double-blind and open-label extension periods, ensuring comprehensive assessment of the treatment's impact and participant safety.