Erding

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

This research aims to gather a large group of patients diagnosed with BCR-ABL 1-negative myeloid neoplasms, classified according to WHO 20082016 standards. The study focuses on collecting detailed clinical, biological, and quality-of-life data to better understand disease characteristics, outcomes, and potential prognostic markers. It is an observational registry conducted by the University of Ulm to improve knowledge about this condition over time. Participants in this registry will provide various biological samples, such as bone marrow aspirate, peripheral blood, plasma, buccal swabs, and occasionally skin biopsies. These samples will be used for morphological and genetic analysis. The study does not involve any experimental treatments but collects comprehensive data and samples to assess disease features and clinical outcomes. Throughout the study, researchers will collect clinical information using a defined catalog of relevant variables and assess quality of life with specific symptom assessment forms. They will track outcomes including treatment decisions, responses, overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response for up to 25 years. This long-term follow-up allows detailed monitoring of patient health and disease progression.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and economic benefits of coronary lithotripsy compared to other lesion preparation methods like cutting or super high pressure balloon angioplasty and ablative procedures. The study focuses on treatment of severely calcified coronary artery stenoses in patients with coronary artery disease. It is a randomized, double-blind trial sponsored by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen. Participants receive lesion preparation either by intravascular lithotripsy using balloons with a rated burst pressure of up to 18 atm or by other standard methods such as high, super high, cutting balloons, and ablative techniques. These procedures are performed before intracoronary stenting. The trial compares these approaches to assess additional benefits in treating severely calcified coronary lesions. During the study, participants are monitored for major cardiac and cerebrovascular events over 12 months after randomization. Researchers also track mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, need for vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, and bleeding events. Symptom assessments for physical and mental health related to coronary heart disease and medical costs are also evaluated. Safety and procedural success are closely observed throughout the study period.