Hamm

This research aims to observe the real-life effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of standard antimyeloma treatments in adults with previously treated relapsed andor refractory multiple myeloma over a 24-month period. The study focuses on participants receiving routine care for this condition as part of their regular medical treatment. Participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma undergoing standard antimyeloma treatments in routine clinical practice will be observed. There is no investigational treatment administered by the study instead, medical records will be the primary data source to track treatments and outcomes during the study. During the study, participants medical records will be reviewed to assess response rates, survival, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse events over up to 52 months. Patient health and well-being will be monitored using standardized questionnaires, and safety will be evaluated through reported side effects. The overall involvement includes observation and data collection without changing the participants treatment plans.

Researchers are collecting data in a registry study for adults diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML, including newly diagnosed and relapsed cases. The study aims to gather important information about the diseases epidemiology, such as patient age and prognostic factors, and to compare incidence and age distribution with population tumor registry data. It also evaluates key clinical outcomes like relapse-free survival, time to relapse, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival. This observational study does not involve treatment assignment but documents treatment strategies used by patients. Data is gathered over a 10-year period to thoroughly monitor outcomes and disease patterns. The registry also collects information on complete remission rates, treatment-related mortality, therapy-associated morbidity, and quality of therapy and diagnosis. Additionally, the study seeks to validate known prognostic factors and explore new ones while describing new therapies and supportive care measures. Participants are adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with AML according to WHO criteria, including acute promyelocytic leukemia. The study involves long-term follow-up with yearly assessments over 10 years. Researchers will evaluate epidemiological parameters and important survival outcomes. Since this is an observational registry, participants continue with their usual care while data is collected. The study is sponsored by Technische Universitt Dresden and involves multiple sites in Germany.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining two drugs, loncastuximab tesirine and epcoritamab, in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma DLBCL, high-grade B-cell lymphoma HGBL, and follicular lymphoma grade 3B. The study includes patients who have not received CAR-T cell therapy but failed first-line treatment, as well as those who have had CAR-T therapy and experienced failure. This is a phase II clinical trial aiming to assess toxicity and response rates in these patient groups. Participants receive loncastuximab tesirine intravenously with an initial dosing schedule followed by maintenance doses every 21 days in responding patients for up to six cycles. Epcoritamab is given as a subcutaneous injection with a step-up dosing during the first cycle, then weekly in cycles 2 and 3, biweekly in cycles 4 to 9, and monthly from cycle 10 to a maximum of 13 cycles. The trial includes a safety analysis after 20 patients start treatment and an interim efficacy analysis after 50 patients are recruited, with additional response assessments for CAR-T naive patients. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging by FDG-PETCT or MRI to evaluate tumor response, laboratory tests for organ function, and monitoring of adverse events up to 150 days after the last drug administration. The primary outcome is the best overall response rate measured 12 months after starting therapy. Secondary outcomes include progression-free and overall survival, response duration, and treatment-related safety events. The trial may last until April 2030, with 120 participants expected to be enrolled.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral controlled-ileocolonic-release nicotinamide CICR-NAM in adults with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis UC. This phase IIIII double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial aims to improve intestinal inflammation by increasing nicotinamide supply in the ileocolonic region, which may positively influence the intestinal microbiota composition. The study is sponsored by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 2 gday or 3 gday of CICR-NAM or a placebo, taken as six tablets daily to maintain blinding. The trial includes a 12-week induction period followed by a 40-week maintenance period, totaling 52 weeks of treatment. An optional open-label arm with 3 gday CICR-NAM is available for patients who complete induction but experience worsening symptoms. During the study, participants will self-administer tablets daily and attend regular visits for assessments. Researchers will monitor symptomatic remission over 12 weeks and clinical remission over 52 weeks. Evaluations include endoscopy, histology, and measurements of disease activity scores and biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin. Safety and adherence will also be closely observed throughout the trial period.

This research aims to gather detailed data and biomaterials from adults diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ALL and related diseases, including certain types of Leukemia and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. The registry supports ALL research and quality assurance by collecting information regardless of whether patients participate in clinical trials. The study is observational and involves adults diagnosed and treated under ALL protocols. Participants include adults aged 18 and older with ALL subtypes, other leukemias treated according to ALL protocols, and specific subtypes of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma treated under B-ALL protocols. The study collects data prospectively on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, along with biomaterials related to these conditions. Participants provide information during routine clinical care and follow-up visits for up to 10 years. Data collected includes survival rates, remission status assessed by various methods including PET scans, relapse rates, quality of life questionnaires, and monitoring of toxicities and comorbidities. The study tracks overall survival and other outcomes over long-term follow-up to support research and quality assurance in adult ALL and related diseases.

Researchers are evaluating a medicine called elranatamab in people with multiple myeloma MM, a type of cancer. This study compares elranatamab to other commonly used combination therapies for MM that has returned or not responded to previous treatments. Participants must be 18 years or older and have received prior treatments, including an anti-CD38 antibody and lenalidomide. The study is a phase 3, randomized trial sponsored by Pfizer. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either elranatamab alone or one of several combination therapies chosen by the study doctor. Elranatamab is given as a shot under the skin at the study clinic about once a week, with possible adjustments later. The combination therapies include two to three medicines taken by mouth or given by injection or infusion at the clinic. Treatment continues until the multiple myeloma stops responding. During the study, participants attend regular visits to monitor their response and side effects. Follow-up continues after treatment ends through telephone contacts or visits. Researchers will measure outcomes such as progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, duration of response, and quality of life over approximately five years. Safety monitoring includes tracking adverse events and laboratory results throughout and after treatment.

Researchers are evaluating whether patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer HRHER2- eBC who have intermediate to high risk of recurrence may benefit from an initial 5-year treatment with elacestrant, with or without a CDK 46 inhibitor, followed by standard endocrine therapy ET for an additional 0 to 2.5 years. This is compared to the current standard of care ET lasting between 5 and 7.5 years, with or without CDK 46 inhibitors. The study is designed for patients identified by genomic tests like Oncotype DX and response to preoperative endocrine therapy, aiming to improve long-term survival by targeting resistance mechanisms such as ESR1 mutations. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving elacestrant orally for 5 years, possibly combined with ribociclib a CDK 46 inhibitor for 3 years if indicated, and the other receiving standard endocrine treatments for 5 to 10 years with optional CDK 46 inhibitors as decided by their doctor. The treatments are evaluated in a parallel study design. The trial builds on previous findings in metastatic breast cancer and early breast cancer studies exploring endocrine therapy responses and genomic risk assessments. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular clinical assessments, including tumor pathology reviews, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms to monitor safety and treatment effects. Researchers measure outcomes such as 5-year invasive disease-free survival and other survival metrics. Participants must comply with contraception requirements and be followed for treatment adherence and safety until study completion, which is planned for up to 2033.

Triple negative breast cancer TNBC is a type of breast cancer that lacks certain receptors and tends to have a poor prognosis and aggressive behavior. The study focuses on patients with low-risk, early-stage TNBC stage I-II node-negative who generally have better outcomes, but still face significant clinical challenges. Researchers are evaluating neoadjuvant therapies to improve treatment strategies for this group, especially comparing sacituzumab govitecan alone versus its combination with pembrolizumab. Participants will receive neoadjuvant treatment for 12 weeks, either sacituzumab govitecan alone or combined with pembrolizumab. Sacituzumab govitecan is given intravenously at 10 mgkg on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days, while pembrolizumab is administered intravenously at 200 mg every three weeks. Depending on their response after 12 weeks, some patients may continue treatment for an additional 6 weeks before surgery. Patients who achieve a complete response may not require further systemic treatment, while those with residual disease may receive additional chemotherapy as decided by their investigator. Throughout the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments including pathological evaluation at surgery and invasive disease-free survival measured after three years. Other outcomes include overall survival and quality of life assessments. Safety and response will be regularly evaluated to guide treatment decisions. The trial aims to enroll adult women with early-stage TNBC and will continue through September 2029, with detailed follow-up planned to capture long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the best neoadjuvant therapy for patients with less advanced HER2-positive early breast cancer EBC. This Phase 2 trial focuses on improving treatment outcomes by comparing trastuzumab-deruxtecan T-DXd with standard chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The study targets patients with low to intermediate risk HER2 EBC, aiming to show higher rates of complete tumor response and excellent survival outcomes. Participants receive different treatment regimens depending on their risk group and assigned study arm. Treatments include 12 or 18 weeks of T-DXd alone or combined with standard chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. After neoadjuvant treatment, post-neoadjuvant therapy with T-DXd or standard care continues for up to one year, with adjustments based on tumor response. Some patients may receive additional chemotherapy depending on residual tumor burden. During the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including tumor response assessments and safety monitoring for adverse drug reactions. Key outcomes measured are pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant therapy and distant disease-free survival after three years. Researchers also track various survival outcomes, quality of life, and treatment-related side effects over time. Participants are followed until study completion in 2030, with detailed monitoring throughout the treatment and follow-up phases.

Researchers are reviewing anonymous medical records from multiple centers to understand the outcomes of different treatments for chronic pain. This study includes several groups to assess how various approaches work in distinct patient subgroups. The focus is on patients who have had or may have spinal cord stimulation systems or other treatments like radiofrequency RF or intradiscal therapies IDS. The study looks at patients who have previously received spinal cord stimulation or other therapies and those who have switched to different treatments afterward. Treatments under review include Boston Scientific devices and non-Boston Scientific systems such as spinal cord stimulation, RF, and IDS. The data is retrospective, meaning it examines past patient experiences without introducing new treatments. Participants involvement consists of the analysis of their de-identified medical charts, with no active treatment or visits required. Researchers will measure responder rates approximately two years from the start of data collection to evaluate treatment outcomes. The study spans from April 2012 to December 2030, focusing on long-term clinical results in chronic pain management.