Hildesheim

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of iberdomide maintenance therapy compared to lenalidomide maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. This phase 3 study aims to determine which maintenance treatment better supports patients following their initial transplant and induction therapies. Participants must have responded to prior treatments and undergone ASCT within specified time frames. Participants will receive either iberdomide or lenalidomide at specified doses on scheduled days as maintenance therapy after their ASCT. The study is randomized, multi-center, and open-label, meaning both participants and researchers know which treatment is given. The treatments will be administered following a standard induction therapy including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and possibly monoclonal antibodies, with or without consolidation after transplant. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival for up to 6 years to assess how well the maintenance therapies prevent disease progression. Researchers will also evaluate safety and treatment response according to established myeloma criteria. Regular assessments will include clinical evaluations and monitoring for any signs of disease relapse or adverse effects over the long term.

Researchers are collecting data in a registry study focused on adults with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The study aims to gather detailed epidemiological information such as age, prognostic factors, and subgroup distributions. It also compares AML incidence and age distribution with population-based tumor registry data. Important clinical outcomes like relapse-free survival, time to relapse, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival are being evaluated over a 10-year period. This study does not involve experimental treatments but instead documents current treatment strategies used in AML patients. Data collection occurs at 60 investigator sites across Germany, providing a broad overview of patient characteristics and management. There is no upper age limit, and all adult patients diagnosed according to WHO criteria, including acute promyelocytic leukemia, are eligible. Participants will be followed for up to 10 years, during which epidemiological parameters and survival outcomes will be monitored. Researchers will record relapse events, time until relapse, and survival status to understand long-term outcomes. This extensive follow-up intends to support improved knowledge about AML patient prognoses and treatment impacts over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and quality of life for combining Abemaciclib with either an Aromatase Inhibitor or Fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. This includes both premenopausal and postmenopausal patients receiving first-line treatment. The trial also explores biomarker research to understand responses and resistance to this combined endocrine therapy. Participants receive Abemaciclib 150 mg orally every 12 hours along with either an Aromatase Inhibitor (Anastrozole, Letrozole, or Exemestane) taken once daily in 28-day cycles, or Fulvestrant given by injection on days 1 and 15 of the first cycle, then on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Side effects and patient-reported outcomes are monitored using the CANKADO digital health app, allowing daily tracking alongside standard clinical documentation. During the study, patients regularly report symptoms and side effects through the app, and undergo laboratory tests, imaging, and clinical assessments to monitor disease progression and treatment safety. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival over up to 48 months. Safety and quality of life are also closely observed throughout the trial period.

Researchers are investigating the use of elacestrant compared to standard endocrine therapy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer who have a relapse detected by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This international, multi-center, randomized, open-label phase III trial aims to determine if elacestrant offers a benefit over current endocrine treatments in this group of patients without distant metastases. The study includes a lengthy ctDNA screening phase to identify eligible participants and monitor their disease status over time. The study begins with a ctDNA screening phase, where patients receive standard adjuvant endocrine therapy such as tamoxifen, letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane, and have blood collected every six months for ctDNA testing until about 5.7 years after enrollment ends. Those who test positive for ctDNA and show no distant metastasis on imaging will be randomized within four weeks to continue their current endocrine therapy or switch to elacestrant taken orally at 400 mg daily. Treatment duration varies based on prior endocrine therapy exposure, ranging from two to seven years. After treatment, further care is at the physician's discretion. Participants will have frequent follow-up visits with ctDNA testing at weeks 4 and 16 post-randomization and every 16 weeks thereafter for up to three years. Imaging studies including mammograms, bone scans, and CT scans will be conducted regularly to monitor for distant metastases or new cancers. The main outcome measured is distant metastasis-free survival, assessed up to 6.25 years following the first patient enrollment. The study ends when all patients complete their visits or discontinue for reasons such as withdrawal, loss to follow-up, or death, and data is fully analyzed and finalized.

Researchers are evaluating the impact of formalized data assessment and systematic feedback on treatment times and survival in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The study aims to see if these strategies can reduce time to treatment, such as contact-to-balloon and door-to-balloon times, and improve clinical outcomes across multiple hospital centers equipped for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This multicenter trial involves hospitals with PCI capability and includes all patients presenting with STEMI. The study is conducted in multiple phases. The Pilot Phase collects data over the first three months as a reference. The Implementation Phase follows with six quarters of standardized documentation, analysis, and systematic feedback sessions to improve prognosis, including multiple hospital systems. The Advance Phase aims to develop and evaluate an automated, standardized feedback tool using a stepped wedge design, with participating centers switching to this new tool over time. Data feedback sessions occur quarterly initially, then annually to hospital and emergency medical staff. Participants are enrolled continuously with data collected through a web-based system during consecutive three-month periods. Researchers measure key time points from initial medical contact to revascularization and provide interactive feedback sessions to involved medical teams. The main outcome measured is the contact-to-balloon time over six consecutive three-month periods. The study monitors procedural and clinical outcomes, aiming to enhance treatment quality and survival rates in STEMI patients over a large regional population.

Researchers are collecting detailed information on adults diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and related blood cancers such as other leukemias and certain types of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. The purpose is to gather real-world data on diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes to support ALL research and improve quality of care. This registry includes patients whether or not they are part of other clinical trials. Participants included in this registry are adults aged 18 and older diagnosed with ALL or similar leukemias who are treated according to established ALL treatment protocols. It also includes patients with specific subtypes of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma treated according to B-ALL protocols. The study involves collecting clinical data and biological samples over time to understand treatment responses and disease progression. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor participants' health outcomes, including overall survival for up to 10 years. Data collected will cover diagnostics, treatments received, and patient outcomes in routine clinical care. This long-term follow-up aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of current therapies and patient experiences with these blood cancers.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare blood disorder where the immune system causes a shortage of platelets, leading to increased bleeding risk. New treatment options have emerged recently, but clinical studies often focus on specific patient groups. This research collects real-world data from a broad range of ITP patients to better understand the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in everyday care. The study also aims to improve personalized therapy and patient results by gathering detailed clinical and biospecimen information. The study involves creating a national registry where clinical data and biospecimens are collected from patients diagnosed with primary or secondary ITP. Data are gathered prospectively at defined points during the disease course, and patients can also be included retrospectively within 12 months of diagnosis if ongoing documentation is available. This includes information about disease factors, treatment types, complications, quality of life, fatigue, and survival over 5 years. Participants will provide written consent and undergo clinical assessments at enrollment and follow-up visits. Researchers will collect epidemiological data such as disease incidence, age and sex distribution, causes, treatment types, and remission status over 5 years. The registry also includes biospecimen collection to support high-quality, standardized research. This ongoing monitoring will help improve knowledge of ITP and support better patient care.

Femara (letrozole) is an extensively investigated, marketed aromatase inhibitor (AI) widely used as treatment in the maintenance phase of estrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, as it inhibit the synthesis of estrogens. Estrogen is a well known driver of cancer growth in ER-positive tumors and a high percentage of the epithelial ovarian cancers express ER as well. Of which low grade ovarian cancers demonstrates the highest level of expression, supporting our strategy of a sub-group analysis (LOGOS). Therefore, letrozole in this study be investigated prospectively and evaluated as maintenance therapy after standard surgical and chemotherapy treatment in comparison to placebo (which is the current standard maintenance treatment) in subjects with primary, ER-positive low or high grade serous or endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer) of FIGO Stage II-IV, whose cancer has not progressed by the end of the platinum-based chemotherapy. The objectives are to evaluate the letrozole maintenance treatment compared to placebo in terms of * progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) * overall survival (OS) * quality-adjusted progression free survival (QAPFS) * time to first subsequent treatment (TFST) * quality-adjusted time without symptoms of toxicity (Q-TWiST) * health related quality of life (QoL) assessed by EQ-5D-5L, FACT-ES and FACT-O questionnaires Methods: 540 for this study eligible subjects are 1:1 allocated in this randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multi-centre study to either the test (letrozole) or control (placebo) group. The maximum maintenance treatment duration is 5 years or until symptoms of toxicity or progression of underlying disease. Health and health-related quality of life will continuously be assessed at study entry and during routine recalls which are scheduled every 12 weeks for the first 2 years, followed by every 24 weeks for the next 3 years. Procedures performed to assess the participants' health are the same as are performed during the regular routine ovarian cancer follow-up visits: blood tests, physical as well as gynaecological examinations and may include imaging. In addition, the participants are asked to complete during the study quality of life (QoL) specific questionnaires and wear an activity tracker for one week just before the scheduled visits. These assessments will be used for the evaluation of letrozole's efficacy and burden in comparison to the standard maintenance treatment. Survival follow-up data after the mainentance treatment duration of 5 years (study end) are obtained for up to another 7 years.

Researchers are investigating treatments for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a type of breast cancer known for its aggressive nature, poor prognosis, and diverse molecular characteristics. This study focuses on patients with early-stage, lower-risk TNBC, particularly those with stage I-II node-negative disease, who generally have better outcomes but still face significant clinical challenges. The trial aims to compare the effects of sacituzumab govitecan alone versus sacituzumab govitecan combined with pembrolizumab in this patient group, seeking to improve treatment responses and survival rates. Participants will receive sacituzumab govitecan at a dose of 10 mg/kg administered twice on days 1 and 8 within a 21-day cycle. Some participants will also receive pembrolizumab at 200 mg every three weeks. The study evaluates treatment durations between 12 and 18 weeks in the neoadjuvant (pre-surgery) setting. The purpose is to assess whether these regimens can produce comparable pathological complete remission rates with a better safety profile compared to standard chemotherapy. The combination with pembrolizumab is explored based on promising results in more advanced TNBC stages. Throughout the study, participants will undergo various assessments including imaging, pathology reviews, and laboratory tests to monitor tumor response and overall health. The primary outcomes measured are pathological complete remission at surgery and invasive disease-free survival rate after three years. Safety and tolerability will also be closely observed. Participants must comply with treatment schedules and follow-ups, providing consent and cooperating with all protocol requirements during the study period.