Schwerte

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are investigating treatments for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a type of breast cancer known for its aggressive nature, poor prognosis, and diverse molecular characteristics. This study focuses on patients with early-stage, lower-risk TNBC, particularly those with stage I-II node-negative disease, who generally have better outcomes but still face significant clinical challenges. The trial aims to compare the effects of sacituzumab govitecan alone versus sacituzumab govitecan combined with pembrolizumab in this patient group, seeking to improve treatment responses and survival rates. Participants will receive sacituzumab govitecan at a dose of 10 mg/kg administered twice on days 1 and 8 within a 21-day cycle. Some participants will also receive pembrolizumab at 200 mg every three weeks. The study evaluates treatment durations between 12 and 18 weeks in the neoadjuvant (pre-surgery) setting. The purpose is to assess whether these regimens can produce comparable pathological complete remission rates with a better safety profile compared to standard chemotherapy. The combination with pembrolizumab is explored based on promising results in more advanced TNBC stages. Throughout the study, participants will undergo various assessments including imaging, pathology reviews, and laboratory tests to monitor tumor response and overall health. The primary outcomes measured are pathological complete remission at surgery and invasive disease-free survival rate after three years. Safety and tolerability will also be closely observed. Participants must comply with treatment schedules and follow-ups, providing consent and cooperating with all protocol requirements during the study period.

Researchers are studying pre- and perimenopausal women with estrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer who have an intermediate to high clinical risk but low genomic risk of recurrence based on MammaPrint4 testing. The study aims to understand the real-world use of ovarian function suppression (OFS) combined with endocrine therapy, with or without prior chemotherapy, and how secondary amenorrhea after chemotherapy might affect outcomes. It also focuses on treatment adherence and quality of life over time, given the importance of long-term endocrine treatment up to 10 years. The registry will follow patients receiving standard-of-care treatment, which may include endocrine therapy with or without ovarian function suppression, and potentially chemotherapy based on clinical decisions. Data on treatment choices, including the use of OFS and chemotherapy, will be collected along with tumor characteristics assessed by local pathology and genomic signatures. Quality of life assessments will be conducted at baseline and multiple time points up to five years, while treatment adherence and outcomes will be tracked over up to 10 years. Participants will provide baseline information including tumor and treatment details. Researchers will collect follow-up data on treatment adherence, quality of life using specific questionnaires, and disease outcomes such as the five-year distant recurrence-free interval. Monitoring will include hormonal status and clinical assessments to correlate treatment effects with genomic risk scores and clinical markers. The overall goal is to improve understanding of treatment patterns and outcomes in this specific breast cancer population under real-world conditions.