Lucknow

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.

Researchers are evaluating whether the drugs retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) who are at high risk. This Phase 3 trial enrolls about 4,500 adults with MASLD identified by non-invasive tests indicating an increased likelihood of developing serious liver problems. The study aims to understand how these treatments might affect liver health over time compared to a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either retatrutide, tirzepatide, or a placebo, all given by subcutaneous injection. The study will last approximately 224 weeks, during which participants may attend 25 to 30 clinic visits for monitoring and assessment. After the main study, eligible participants can join an optional 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their original group. Throughout the trial, participants’ liver function and disease progression will be closely monitored through various health assessments. Researchers will track the time to the first major adverse liver event as the main outcome. Safety and health status will be evaluated regularly during clinic visits, ensuring thorough observation over the long study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and performance of the Polymer Free Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent Vivo ISAR in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This prospective, observational registry includes patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using this stent and are planned for a short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen lasting up to 3 months. The aim is to assess clinical outcomes in a real-world population across multiple countries and centers. Participants receive the Vivo ISAR stent and follow standard care with a short DAPT treatment of no more than 3 months after PCI. The study does not influence the choice of device or treatment beyond routine care. After the procedure, patients who meet eligibility criteria and provide consent are enrolled and observed over time without additional interventions. Participants will be followed up through routine clinical practice and telephone calls at 30 days, 3 months, and 12 months after PCI. These follow-ups collect information on ongoing medications, any lab tests performed, adverse events, and any further interventions. The main outcomes measured at 12 months include ischemic events and bleeding events related to the treatment and stent use.

Researchers are investigating whether ziltivekimab can treat people living with heart failure and inflammation. The study compares ziltivekimab, a new medicine not yet approved anywhere, to a placebo, an inactive substance that looks like the medicine but contains no active drug. Participants have an equal chance of receiving either treatment. The study is expected to last up to one year and four months and focuses on people with heart failure who also have systemic inflammation. Participants will receive either ziltivekimab or placebo by monthly injections under the skin. The doses are given once a month throughout the study period. The study lasts for 12 months of treatment following randomization, during which the effects of the medicine compared to placebo will be closely monitored. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including a heart failure questionnaire called the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) to measure symptoms and physical function over the 12 months. Other evaluations may include walking tests and heart function tests. Safety and health will be monitored regularly to understand how participants respond to the treatments and to track any side effects or changes in heart failure symptoms.

Researchers are evaluating ziltivekimab as a treatment for people living with heart failure and inflammation. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab to a placebo in participants with heart failure who have mild to preserved ejection fraction and systemic inflammation. The study aims to assess the effect of ziltivekimab on cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent heart failure visits over a period of up to 4 years. Participants will receive monthly injections of either ziltivekimab or a placebo using a pre-filled syringe or a pen-injector. The study medication is administered subcutaneously once a month for up to 4 years. The trial includes up to 20 clinic visits during which participants will be monitored and assessed. During the study, participants will use a study app on their phone to record all injections and complete questionnaires. Researchers will monitor participants for key outcomes like cardiovascular events and heart failure episodes from the time of randomization until the end of the study. Safety and health status will be regularly evaluated throughout the study period, which may last up to 48 months.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have previously received an anti-CD38 antibody and lenalidomide. The study compares the effectiveness of talquetamab combined with pomalidomide (Tal-P), talquetamab combined with teclistamab (Tal-Tec), and investigator's choice between two standard regimens: elotuzumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (EPd), or pomalidomide with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd). This Phase 3 trial aims to understand which combination best controls the disease progression. Participants will receive talquetamab as a subcutaneous injection, pomalidomide orally, teclistamab as a subcutaneous injection, elotuzumab intravenously, dexamethasone either orally or intravenously, and bortezomib as a subcutaneous injection. The study involves comparing these combinations with varying administration routes. The trial includes multiple treatment arms to assess different drug combinations in patients who have undergone 1 to 4 prior therapies. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival up to 3 years and 5 months. Researchers will regularly assess disease status, treatment response, and safety. Participants' performance status will be evaluated, and adherence to treatment and potential side effects will be carefully tracked. This long-term observation will help determine how well each treatment combination controls the disease over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of brenipatide when given along with standard care compared to a placebo with standard care in adults with bipolar disorder. This Phase 2 study aims to see if brenipatide can delay the worsening of bipolar symptoms. The trial includes participants aged 18 to 75 years and involves a careful assessment of how well the treatment works and its safety profile. The trial has three main periods: a screening period lasting about one month, a treatment period of at least six months, and a follow-up period of around two months. Participants receive either brenipatide or placebo, both given by subcutaneous injection, alongside their usual bipolar disorder medications. The study may end earlier if symptoms worsen or if participants withdraw for any reason. Participants will be asked to self-inject the study medication, maintain diaries, complete questionnaires, and attend regular visits throughout the study. Researchers will monitor the time to relapse, defined as the number of days from randomization until symptoms worsen according to specific criteria, over at least six months. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed during the study.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of brenipatide combined with standard care compared to a placebo with standard care in adults with schizophrenia. This phase 2 study aims to understand how well brenipatide works as an additional treatment for schizophrenia and monitor any side effects. Participants eligible for the study must have schizophrenia and be on stable standard care medication. The trial consists of three main periods: a screening period lasting about one month, a treatment period that can last up to 12 months, and a follow-up period of approximately two months. During the treatment phase, participants receive either brenipatide or placebo administered by subcutaneous injection alongside their standard care. The study includes careful monitoring and adherence to study procedures such as self-injection, keeping diaries, and completing questionnaires. Participants will be involved in regular visits and assessments throughout the entire study duration, which may last up to 15 months. Researchers will measure changes in body weight from baseline to week 52 as a primary outcome. Participants will also be monitored for safety and efficacy through ongoing evaluations, including the use of electronic or paper diaries and required questionnaires to track their progress and response to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of eloralintide compared to a placebo for reducing body weight in adults who have overweight or obesity along with type 2 diabetes. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study focuses on participants who have been on stable treatment for their type 2 diabetes and aims to provide detailed information on body weight changes over time. Participants will receive either eloralintide or a placebo administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly. The study lasts about 75 weeks, including treatment and follow-up periods. The goal is to monitor the changes in body weight from the beginning of the study through week 64. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments to track body weight and overall health. Researchers will collect data on weight changes and monitor safety throughout the study period. The main outcome measured is the percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 64, ensuring close observation of participants' responses to the treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of the drug orforglipron compared with a placebo on cardiovascular outcomes in adults who have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to investigate major adverse cardiovascular events over a long period. Participants will receive either orforglipron or a placebo orally. The study is event-driven and will continue until the occurrence of major cardiovascular events or up to about 5 years. The treatments are administered without revealing to participants which group they are in to ensure unbiased results. During the study, participants will be monitored for the time to the first occurrence of a major cardiovascular event. Researchers will collect data from baseline through the end of the study, which lasts approximately 5 years. Regular assessments will help evaluate the safety and effects of the treatments on cardiovascular health in this population.