Pescia

Researchers are conducting a large prospective, observational cohort study to assess the clinical impact of new monoclonal antibodies (MAB) in treating B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) within Italian clinical practice. The study focuses on patients needing treatment for B-cell NHL, including those receiving first-line or relapsed/refractory therapy. The novel MAB being studied have received approval from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) since 2020 and are prescribed according to authorized marketing indications in Italy. Participants will receive novel MAB treatments either alone or in combination, prescribed based on EMA-approved indications since 2020. Patients will be grouped into cohorts according to the treatment indication, antibody type, and lymphoma subtype, with additional sub-cohorts created if necessary. This design allows analysis by indication, antibody type, subtype, and overall evaluation of the entire patient cohort. Throughout the study, researchers will collect clinical information to evaluate the use, feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of these novel antibodies. Key outcomes measured over at least five years include overall response rate, complete response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, event-free survival, time to next treatment, non-relapse mortality, duration of response, and incidence of early and late adverse events. Participants will be closely monitored for both short- and long-term effects of the treatments.

Researchers are evaluating patients who have experienced athero-thrombotic events such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral artery disease. The study aims to assess how well patients follow guideline recommendations, particularly focusing on improving cholesterol levels and other modifiable risk factors to reduce the chance of cardiovascular event recurrence. This observational and prospective study takes place across multiple cardiology centers in Italy to represent a broad patient population. The study includes several phases starting with an educational intervention to discuss guideline recommendations for secondary prevention. Following this, data is collected for three months or until 30 patients with documented cardiovascular conditions are enrolled, using a web-based case record form that identifies when guidelines are not followed and records reasons for non-adherence. After six months, primary and secondary outcomes are evaluated. A second educational intervention then shares findings from the first phase to highlight gaps in clinical practice, followed by another three-month data collection period and a further six-month outcome assessment. Finally, all patients are followed for 12 months to monitor longer-term results. Participants provide informed consent and are monitored through data collection forms that track adherence to guidelines and clinical outcomes. The main outcome measured is adherence to cholesterol management guidelines over six months. Additional assessments include adherence to recommendations for other cardiovascular risk factors. Throughout the study, researchers gather data to understand how guideline adherence affects patient health and to identify barriers to following best practices, with continuous follow-up over a year to evaluate sustained effects.