Matosinhos

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effects of nerandomilast in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) who have previously completed treatment with nerandomilast in earlier studies. The study aims to understand how well participants tolerate nerandomilast over time, and whether it helps improve lung function, delays symptom worsening, reduces hospital visits, or impacts survival. This is a Phase 3 open-label extension trial. Participants take nerandomilast tablets daily for up to 1 year and 10 months while continuing their usual pulmonary fibrosis treatments. The study follows an open-label design where all participants receive nerandomilast. There are no placebo or comparator groups in this extension phase. Throughout the study, participants regularly visit their doctors for health assessments and lung function tests. Doctors monitor any health problems or side effects experienced during treatment. The main outcome measured is whether participants experience any adverse events up to the final follow-up visit, which occurs at week 99. This close monitoring helps evaluate the long-term safety and potential benefits of nerandomilast in this patient group.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are investigating the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of two dosing regimens of itepekimab compared to placebo as an add-on to intranasal corticosteroids in adults with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that is not well controlled. This multinational Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involves male and female participants aged 18 years and older living with CRSwNP. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either itepekimab injections or placebo injections, both administered subcutaneously, alongside mometasone furoate nasal spray delivered intranasally. The study includes a 4-week screening period, followed by a 52-week treatment phase, and a 20-week safety follow-up, totaling up to 76 weeks. Participants transitioning to an extension study (LTS18420) will have a total duration of 56 weeks. Study visits include nine site visits and 20 phone or home visits. During the trial, participants will undergo assessments including endoscopic Nasal Polyp Scores (NPS) and Nasal Congestion Scores (NCS) measured from baseline to week 24 to evaluate changes. Researchers will monitor safety and tolerability throughout, with regular evaluations involving symptom severity, treatment adherence, and adverse events. The study aims to understand how well itepekimab works and is tolerated as an additional treatment for CRSwNP over the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for people with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This phase 3 study compares the effectiveness of adding tarlatamab to a combination of durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide against the combination without tarlatamab. The main goal is to see which treatment better prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival over about 3.5 years. Participants receive intravenous infusions of the study drugs. One group gets tarlatamab combined with durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide, while the other group receives durvalumab, carboplatin, and etoposide alone. All treatments are given as first-line therapy for their lung cancer. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess their response to treatment and overall health. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival to evaluate treatment benefit. The study also involves ongoing safety monitoring, and participants will be followed for up to approximately 3.5 years to collect these outcomes.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3 study to compare two front-line treatments for adults with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is stage IV or advanced stage IIIB/C. The study focuses on patients whose tumors have a KRAS p.G12C mutation and are negative for PD-L1 expression. The main goal is to evaluate how each treatment affects progression-free survival and overall survival over about 2.5 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sotorasib combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy or pembrolizumab combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy. Sotorasib is given orally, while pembrolizumab is given intravenously. Both groups will receive the combination therapies as their initial treatment for advanced NSCLC. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess treatment effects and safety. Researchers will track how long patients live without the cancer worsening and overall survival over approximately 2.5 years. The study includes evaluations to determine eligibility and ongoing assessments to monitor health and treatment response throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating whether baricitinib can delay the onset of clinical stage 3 type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children and adults at high risk of developing the disease. This phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study includes participants aged 1 to under 36 years who have early stages of T1D or multiple diabetes-related autoantibodies indicating increased risk. The study aims to measure the time from the start of the trial to diagnosis of stage 3 type 1 diabetes, with participation lasting up to approximately 5 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either baricitinib or a placebo, both administered orally. The trial compares these two groups to assess the impact of baricitinib on delaying progression to stage 3 T1D. The study's design includes careful monitoring of participants over time to evaluate the effects of the medication or placebo on disease development. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to detect the progression of diabetes, including laboratory tests for autoantibodies and clinical evaluations. Researchers will track the time it takes for participants to develop stage 3 T1D, along with monitoring safety and any adverse effects. The total duration of participation can be up to 5 years, ensuring thorough observation of long-term outcomes related to the study interventions.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of camizestrant compared to standard endocrine therapy in patients with early breast cancer that is estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-). These patients have an intermediate or high risk of cancer recurrence and have already completed local treatments such as surgery and possibly chemotherapy, alongside at least 2 years and up to 5 years of standard adjuvant endocrine therapy. The study is a Phase III, open-label trial designed to assess outcomes over a long term. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either camizestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, or one of several standard endocrine therapies including tamoxifen, anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane, administered according to local approved guidelines. The treatment duration for both groups is planned to last 60 months. Eligible patients may have previously used CDK4/6 inhibitors, and the study will specifically include those with intermediate or high risk of recurrence as determined by clinical and biological markers. During the study, participants will be monitored for up to 10 years from the last patient's randomization to evaluate invasive breast cancer-free survival. Additional outcomes include invasive disease-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, safety, and clinical outcome assessments. The study involves ongoing assessments of health status, treatment effects, and safety to determine the long-term benefits and risks of camizestrant compared to standard therapies.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Dostarlimab compared to a placebo in adults with locally advanced unresected Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on patients who have completed chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin and radiation and have no distant metastatic disease. The study requires confirmation of PD-L1 positive tumor status and specific testing for oropharyngeal carcinoma cases. Participants will receive either Dostarlimab or a placebo as an intravenous infusion following their chemoradiation treatment. The study monitors these treatments as sequential therapy to assess their impact on disease progression. Treatments are administered in a controlled, blinded manner to compare outcomes between the two groups effectively. During the study, participants will be followed for up to approximately five years to measure event-free survival, with evaluations conducted by blinded independent central review. Assessments will include monitoring for safety, disease status, and any adverse events throughout the study period. This long-term follow-up aims to provide comprehensive data on the effectiveness and safety of Dostarlimab as post-chemoradiation therapy in this patient population.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding sacituzumab tirumotecan to pembrolizumab after surgery improves treatment outcomes for adults with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not achieved a complete response after initial therapy. This Phase 3 study compares the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone, focusing on disease-free survival as measured by a blinded independent central review. Participants receive neoadjuvant treatments including pembrolizumab with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (such as cisplatin, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, carboplatin, or paclitaxel) before surgery. After surgery, those without a complete pathological response are randomized to receive either sacituzumab tirumotecan every two weeks for up to 24 weeks plus pembrolizumab every six weeks for up to 42 weeks, or pembrolizumab alone. Rescue medications may be given to prevent infusion reactions and oral side effects. During the study, participants undergo regular radiological assessments and provide tumor tissue samples to evaluate markers like PD-L1 and TROP2. Researchers monitor disease-free survival for up to approximately 93 months. Safety assessments, recovery from previous therapies, and control of infections such as HIV or hepatitis are also part of participant evaluations throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of increasing doses of IPN10200 to understand its pharmacodynamics and identify the best dose for treating adults with upper limb spasticity. This integrated Phase I/II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized study also compares IPN10200 with Dysport and placebo to find the optimal balance of efficacy and safety in adults aged 18 to 70 years with spastic hemiparesis following stroke or traumatic brain injury. Participants receive either IPN10200, Dysport, or placebo as a powder and solvent solution for injection. The study includes dose escalation and dose-finding phases to assess different dosing levels. Treatments are administered in the affected upper limb muscles, with eligibility based on specific muscle tone and spasticity angle criteria. The study monitors participants for up to 9 months, including a safety follow-up period. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), clinical lab tests, physical examinations, and monitoring for treatment-emergent adverse events and antibodies to the study drugs. Researchers use these measures to evaluate safety and treatment effects over the 9-month period from baseline through the end of the study.