Oldham

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating tirzepatide in adults with obesity who do not have diabetes but have at least one weight-related health condition. The study aims to assess body weight loss and the development of type 2 diabetes over a long period in a real-world setting. This is a Phase 4 clinical trial sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either weekly subcutaneous injections of tirzepatide in addition to standard care or standard care alone. The study uses a parallel design to compare these two groups and lasts about 260 weeks 5 years. The focus is on long-term effects and real-world treatment outcomes. During the study, participants will have regular assessments including measurements of body weight, blood sugar control HbA1c, waist circumference, blood pressure, cholesterol, kidney function, quality of life, and healthcare resource use. The primary outcome is the percent change in body weight from baseline to 24 months. Secondary outcomes cover diabetes onset, metabolic changes, obesity-related complications, and quality of life over 60 months. Participants will be monitored throughout the study duration for safety and health changes.

Researchers are evaluating whether the combination of vicadrostat BI 690517 and empagliflozin helps adults with heart failure who have symptoms and a left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF of 40% or more. This phase III study is designed to compare the effects of vicadrostatempagliflozin tablets versus placeboempagliflozin tablets on heart failure outcomes. The study aims to understand if this combined treatment improves health and reduces heart-related events. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one group takes vicadrostat plus empagliflozin tablets once a day, and the other takes placebo plus empagliflozin tablets once a day. The study has no fixed duration and continues as long as participants benefit and tolerate the treatment. Throughout the study, participants visit their doctors regularly for health checks, and study staff may also contact them by phone to monitor well-being and any side effects. During the study, researchers monitor participants health through regular doctor visits and phone contacts. They collect data on heart-related events such as cardiovascular death, hospitalizations for heart failure, and urgent visits for heart failure over up to 42 months. Participants also answer questions about their symptoms and well-being. The study carefully tracks safety and treatment tolerance while gathering information to determine if the combined treatment helps people with heart failure.

Researchers are evaluating the impact of two different default dialysate sodium concentrations on major cardiovascular events and death in adults receiving maintenance haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. This pragmatic, cluster-randomised, open-label Phase 4 study compares sodium levels of 137 mmoll and 140 mmoll in real-world dialysis settings across multiple sites globally. Dialysis sites will be randomly assigned to use either a default dialysate sodium concentration of 137 mmoll or 140 mmoll for at least 90% of dialysis sessions. Other aspects of patient care will follow standard local practices. Sites must consent to participate, and individual patients will provide waiver or opt-out consent. The study expects to enroll sites over 5 to 7 years, with each participant followed for approximately 2 to 5 years until the study endpoints are reached. Participants will receive dialysis at their assigned sites with the designated sodium concentration. Researchers will monitor the time to first occurrence of major cardiovascular events or death as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include other cardiovascular events and individual components of the composite outcomes. Data collection and patient monitoring will continue throughout the study period, estimated to last around five years per participant.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for community-acquired pneumonia CAP, especially in patients admitted to intensive care units ICUs. This trial also adapts to study treatments for respiratory pandemics like COVID-19. The goal is to determine which treatment strategies improve outcomes for patients with severe pneumonia, using a flexible, ongoing approach that can test multiple therapies simultaneously and update as new information becomes available. Participants receive different treatment strategies based on random assignment to study groups. Treatments include various antibiotics, steroids, antivirals, immune modulators, anticoagulation methods, and ventilation strategies. Some treatment options have been closed to recruitment, reflecting the trials adaptive nature. The trial includes several domains targeting specific infections such as influenza and COVID-19, with dosing and duration guided by clinical practice and local guidelines. During the study, participants are monitored closely with assessments including survival up to 90 days, days alive without organ support in ICU, ICU and hospital length of stay, ventilator-free days, organ failure-free days, and quality of life up to 6 months. Researchers collect detailed data on patient outcomes, organ support needs, and hospital discharge status. The study runs until February 2028, with ongoing evaluation to improve pneumonia treatment strategies in ICU settings and during respiratory pandemics.

The trial investigates the role of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who have previously undergone autologous stem cell transplant ASCT. It is a phase III, randomized, controlled, multi-center, open-label study aiming to assess whether adding a proteasome inhibitor to salvage ASCT conditioning improves depth of response and how consolidation and maintenance therapy influence the durability of response. The study also evaluates overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, minimal residual disease, toxicity, and quality of life. Participants first receive re-induction therapy with 4 to 6 cycles of ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone ITD, each cycle lasting 28 days. Those achieving at least stable disease are randomly assigned to receive either conventional ASCT using melphalan alone or augmented ASCT combining melphalan with ixazomib. After ASCT, participants with minimal response or better are further randomized to either receive consolidation with 2 cycles of ITD followed by ixazomib maintenance until disease progression or no further treatment. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including response evaluation 100 days post-ASCT, monitoring of progression-free survival for up to 120 months, and measurement of minimal residual disease at several time points. Safety and toxicity are closely monitored throughout re-induction, post-ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance phases. Quality of life questionnaires are completed at baseline, post-re-induction, post-ASCT, and during follow-up visits up to 24 months. The study plans to register 406 participants, with 284 randomized at the first stage and 248 at the second stage.

This research aims to collect and analyze information about babies born at 22 weeks of pregnancy in the UK to better understand their clinical care and outcomes. Since survival-focused care for these extremely premature babies has only been offered since 2019, there is limited data on how they respond to treatment and what challenges they face. The study gathers data from multiple neonatal intensive care units NICUs across the UK to improve knowledge for future care and support families. Data collection involves medical staff entering selected, anonymized information from babies medical records into a secure database. The study observes babies who are attended by neonatal teams at birth or admitted to NICUs within the first 72 hours of life. No changes are made to the babies care during the study, and a one-time survey of NICUs will assess unit approaches and equipment used for 22-week babies. Participants data, including clinical care details and short-term outcomes such as survival to discharge, are analyzed. Researchers will report on interventions across various care areas and outcomes like brain injury or infections. Parents receive information about data use, and individual babies cannot be identified in results. The study runs from admission until death or discharge from neonatal care, aiming to inform future research and improve care practices.