Camarillo

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of pegozafermin in adults aged 18 to 75 years who have compensated cirrhosis caused by metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), previously known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Participants in this phase 3 study must have biopsy-confirmed advanced liver fibrosis (stage F4) due to MASH and meet specific metabolic health criteria. The study aims to understand how well pegozafermin can help improve liver fibrosis and delay disease progression over time. Participants will receive either pegozafermin or a placebo through subcutaneous injections. The study will monitor participants over a long period, up to five years, to observe changes in liver fibrosis and any clinical events related to disease progression. The treatment is given to those with compensated cirrhosis, meaning their liver is damaged but still functioning, and the study carefully evaluates the safety and potential benefits of pegozafermin in this group. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to track liver health, including fibrosis regression and timing of disease progression. Researchers will use clinical events and laboratory tests to measure outcomes from the start of the study through 24 months and up to five years. Safety and health will be monitored closely, ensuring any side effects or complications are identified promptly. This comprehensive follow-up helps provide detailed information on the long-term effects of the treatment and participants' liver condition.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of the medicine PF-07248144 combined with fulvestrant for treating hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This type of breast cancer involves cancer cells that grow in response to hormones like estrogen and progesterone but have little or no HER2 protein. The study focuses on people whose breast cancer worsened after treatment with cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor therapy. The trial is a phase 3, open-label, randomized study comparing PF-07248144 plus fulvestrant to other therapies chosen by doctors. Participants will receive either PF-07248144 tablets daily at home in 28-day cycles combined with fulvestrant injections at the clinic, or the usual treatment of everolimus tablets with endocrine therapy (either exemestane or fulvestrant). The study doctor will help decide the hormone therapy before starting treatment. The trial compares the experiences of those taking PF-07248144 plus fulvestrant with those receiving standard treatments to assess safety and effectiveness. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for disease progression or death, using blinded independent central review based on standard tumor response criteria. The main outcome measure is progression-free survival for up to about 2 years from randomization. Regular assessments, including clinical visits for injections and evaluations, will help track treatment effects and safety throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.