Pomona

Researchers are evaluating the effect of three different doses of the drug leflutrozole on semen quality in men, focusing on whether it can improve sperm count and overall testicular function. This Phase 2 clinical trial also aims to assess the safety of leflutrozole compared to a placebo, exploring any medical problems that may arise during treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of leflutrozole or a placebo, taken orally once a week for 16 weeks. The study is double-blind and placebo-controlled, with treatments given in parallel groups. Visits to the clinic are scheduled every 4 weeks for checkups and testing throughout the 16-week treatment period. During the study, participants will provide semen samples to evaluate changes in total motile sperm count and semen volume. Blood tests will be conducted to measure hormone levels and monitor safety. Researchers will track any side effects and overall health, with the main outcome measured as the change in total motile sperm count from baseline to the end of treatment at 16 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of two combined treatments, KarXT and KarX-EC, for adults aged 55 to 90 who experience agitation related to Alzheimer's Disease. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to better understand how these treatments may help reduce agitation symptoms in this population while monitoring safety. Participants will receive either the active drugs Xanomeline/Trospium Chloride Capsule and Xanomeline Enteric Capsule or a placebo, taken at specified doses on designated days. The study is carefully designed to compare these treatments against placebo to evaluate their impact on agitation symptoms associated with Alzheimer's Disease. During the study, participants will be assessed using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-International Psychogeriatric Association (CMAI-IPA) total score to measure changes from baseline at Week 14. Caregivers will be involved to help monitor compliance and report participant status throughout the study. Safety and efficacy will be closely monitored during this 14-week period to gather detailed information about treatment outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

Researchers are investigating whether treating children with amblyopia using spectacles and patching at the same time leads to similar vision improvement compared to treating first with spectacles alone and then adding patching if needed. This randomized Phase 3 trial focuses on children aged 3 to under 13 years who have not been treated for amblyopia before. The study looks at amblyopia caused by differences in eye focusing (anisometropia), eye misalignment (strabismus), or both. At the start, children's vision will be tested with trial glasses based on a recent eye exam. Eligible children will receive new glasses and return for a baseline visit after wearing them for at least 10 minutes to confirm eligibility. Then they will be randomly assigned to either the sequential group (glasses first, patching added if needed) or the simultaneous group (glasses and patching together). Follow-up visits will happen every 8 weeks for up to 56 weeks, with vision tested each time to track improvement or stability. Patching will be monitored using an occlusion dose monitor (ODM). Throughout the study, vision in the amblyopic eye will be regularly measured to assess changes. Participants will be categorized as improving or stable/worsening at each visit. Those with stable or worsening vision and remaining amblyopia in the sequential group will begin patching and continue follow-up visits. Treatment adjustments will be made based on investigator judgment. The main outcome is the average change in distance visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after 56 weeks of treatment. The study ends after the final 56-week visit.

Researchers are evaluating insulin icodec, a once-weekly insulin injection, compared to insulin glargine, a once-daily injection, in adults with type 1 diabetes. The study aims to see how well weekly insulin icodec controls blood sugar levels compared to daily insulin glargine when both are combined with insulin aspart. This phase 3 study will last about 26 weeks, or roughly 8.5 months. Participants will receive either insulin icodec or insulin glargine, both given as subcutaneous injections. All participants will also use insulin aspart as a subcutaneous injection. The study compares these two insulin regimens to assess their effects on blood sugar control over the 26-week period. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from the start of the study to week 26. Participants will follow the study protocol including self-measured plasma glucose profiles. Safety and efficacy will be evaluated throughout the treatment period to understand the impact of the insulin regimens on blood sugar control and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness of dotinurad compared to allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels in adults with hyperuricemia related to gout. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial focuses on adults aged 18 to 75 who have had gout for at least one year and experienced multiple gout flares in the past year. The study aims to assess the percentage of participants achieving an sUA level below 6.0 mg/dL at 24 weeks. Participants receive either dotinurad or allopurinol as oral over-encapsulated tablets. Allopurinol doses range from 200 mg/day for those with moderate kidney impairment to 600 mg/day, with participants maintaining a stable dose for at least three months before starting the study. The trial includes a 24-week treatment period where the effects of these medications on uric acid levels are monitored and compared. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including serum uric acid measurements at screening and throughout the 24 weeks. Female participants of childbearing potential have pregnancy tests and must agree to contraception requirements. Researchers monitor safety, treatment adherence, and gout flare history to evaluate the treatments' efficacy and tolerability over the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of dotinurad compared to allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels at 24 weeks in adults with tophaceous gout. This condition involves the presence of measurable tophi, or deposits of uric acid crystals, in joints such as hands, wrists, feet, or ankles. The study is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial focused on adults aged 18 to 75 years who have had gout for at least one year. Participants receive either dotinurad or allopurinol in over-encapsulated tablet form, taken orally. The treatments are compared to see which better lowers sUA levels below 5.0 mg/dL after 24 weeks. The study includes a screening period before treatment begins, during which eligibility is confirmed, including measurements of tophi size and uric acid levels. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor serum uric acid levels and the size of tophi. Safety and side effects will also be monitored throughout the 24-week treatment period. The main outcome is the percentage of participants who achieve sUA levels less than 5.0 mg/dL at week 24, helping to understand the comparative efficacy and safety of the two medications.

Researchers are evaluating VERVE-102, an investigational drug using base-editing technology, in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or premature coronary artery disease (CAD) who need additional lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). This open-label Phase 1b study aims to assess the safety and pharmacodynamic effects of VERVE-102 by disrupting the PCSK9 gene expression in the liver to reduce circulating PCSK9 and LDL-C. Participants will receive VERVE-102 through an intravenous infusion in a single ascending dose format. The study is designed to observe how the body responds to different dose levels of this investigational drug. There are no comparator groups listed, and the treatment is administered only once during the study. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events for up to 365 days after receiving VERVE-102. Regular safety and laboratory evaluations will be conducted to assess the drug's safety profile. The total participation duration includes this one-year follow-up period to track any potential side effects or reactions.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of empasiprubart compared to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in adults diagnosed with Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN). This Phase 3 study includes a double-blinded phase where participants receive either empasiprubart or IVIg, followed by an open-label phase where all receive empasiprubart. The study aims to assess treatment impact over a maximum duration of up to 49 months. Participants receive intravenous infusions of either empasiprubart or IVIg during the double-blinded phase, with matching placebo infusions given to maintain blinding. In the open-label phase, all participants are given empasiprubart infusions. The study carefully monitors treatments and their effects throughout these periods. Participants undergo assessments including measuring changes in grip strength of their most affected hand, using a 3-day moving average at week 24 as the primary outcome. Safety and efficacy are tracked throughout the study duration, with detailed follow-up visits and evaluations to monitor participant response and well-being during the study period.