San Juan Bautista

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer after surgery by using the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood. This approach aims to identify microscopic residual tumor cells and may provide better risk prediction for cancer recurrence compared to traditional methods. The trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or III colon cancer who have undergone complete tumor removal. Participants will have their tumor tissue and blood tested centrally using the Signatera assay to determine ctDNA status. Patients without detectable ctDNA may avoid chemotherapy, while those with detectable ctDNA are considered at higher risk and will be randomly assigned to receive different chemotherapy regimens, including mFOLFOX6, CAPOX, or mFOLFIRINOX, given intravenously or orally over periods ranging from 3 to 6 months. The study includes initial screening, treatment, and possible second randomization for patients whose ctDNA status changes during monitoring. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests, imaging scans, and performance evaluations to monitor their health and response to therapy. Researchers will track the time to ctDNA positivity and disease-free survival for up to 3 and 5 years, respectively. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed throughout the study duration, ensuring thorough follow-up and monitoring for all participants.

Researchers are conducting a two-part, phase 2b/3 study to evaluate CSL300 (Clazakizumab) in adults with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis who have systemic inflammation and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes. The study aims to determine the best dose of CSL300 and assess its effects on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in this population. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial targets patients with elevated inflammation markers and significant health risks due to their conditions. In the first part (phase 2b), the study focuses on finding the appropriate dose of CSL300 compared to placebo. CSL300 is given through intravenous (IV) administration. The second part (phase 3) evaluates the impact of CSL300 on cardiovascular events such as heart attack or cardiovascular death over approximately 5 years, continuing to compare CSL300 to placebo for safety and efficacy. The placebo matches CSL300's excipient content but lacks the active drug. Participants will undergo baseline and regular assessments for inflammation markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) up to 12 weeks in phase 2b, and long-term monitoring for cardiovascular outcomes in phase 3. The study involves ongoing safety evaluations and efficacy measurements during the entire follow-up period. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand how CSL300 affects inflammation and cardiovascular health in patients with ESKD on dialysis.

Researchers are evaluating two digital mindfulness meditation programs to support mental health and well-being in younger breast cancer survivors who have elevated depressive symptoms. This phase III trial focuses on women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 50 or younger who have completed their main cancer treatments at least six months ago. The study aims to compare a live, instructor-led online program to a self-paced app-based program and also to explore factors that might influence how well these interventions work, including psychological distress levels and social factors like race and education. Participants will be assigned to one of three groups: a live online Mindful Awareness Practices (MAPs) program delivered over Zoom, a self-paced MAPs digital app, or a meditation-only control group. The live online program includes guided meditations, exercises to manage pain and emotions, and cultivating kindness, with daily home practice increasing from 5 to 20 minutes. The app program unlocks lessons sequentially as participants progress. Meditation use will be tracked across all groups to measure engagement. During the study, participants will report depressive symptoms two weeks after completing the intervention. Researchers will also collect information on emotion regulation strategies and social determinants of health, and monitor how much participants practice mindfulness to understand the programs' effects. The total intervention lasts six weeks, and participants must be able to use a digital device and communicate in English or Spanish. Safety and participation are closely monitored throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating if adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) compared to OFS plus ET alone. This Phase III trial focuses on premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and has a 21-gene recurrence score between 16-25 for node-negative patients or 0-25 for patients with 1-3 positive nodes. The study addresses the need for better treatment options for younger women diagnosed with this type of breast cancer, as younger age is linked to worse outcomes despite standard therapies. Participants receive one of two treatments: either OFS combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for five years or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same OFS plus AI regimen. The specific AI and GnRH agonist used, along with their dosing schedules, are chosen by the investigator, commonly including goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin administered monthly or every three months. Bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. Endocrine therapy beyond five years is at the investigator's discretion. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival over an 11-year period from randomization. Assessments include clinical evaluations, hormone receptor testing, tumor staging, and genetic recurrence scoring prior to enrollment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected throughout the study, with particular attention to treatment side effects and long-term outcomes. The trial involves detailed eligibility screening and ongoing follow-up to ensure accurate measurement of the study's primary outcome.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma in this phase III trial. The study compares the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone given with or without daratumumab. These drugs work in different ways to stop tumor growth, and the combination with daratumumab, an immunotherapy, may better interfere with tumor cell growth and spread. The trial aims to assess overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment safety, and quality of life among participants. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives daratumumab intravenously on specific days across up to 24 cycles, combined with daily oral lenalidomide for 21 days and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for 12 cycles. The other group receives only lenalidomide and dexamethasone on the same schedule for up to 24 cycles. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and patient questionnaires to monitor treatment effects and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 15 years, evaluate minimal residual disease, and monitor medication adherence and adverse events. Follow-up visits occur every 3, 6, or 12 months after treatment ends to continue monitoring health outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

Researchers are evaluating the use of osimertinib alone versus a combination of osimertinib and bevacizumab for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has spread beyond the lungs and has specific mutations in the EGFR gene. This phase III trial focuses on whether adding bevacizumab, which blocks blood vessel growth to tumors, can better control cancer and improve survival compared to osimertinib alone, a drug that blocks EGFR involved in cancer cell growth. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either osimertinib by mouth once daily or osimertinib with bevacizumab given intravenously every 21 days. Treatment continues unless the cancer progresses or side effects become unacceptable. The study includes imaging tests like CT, MRI, echocardiography, and MUGA scans to monitor disease and heart function, along with blood and urine sample collection. Participants are followed for up to 10 years after treatment ends, with check-ups every 3 months to measure progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and side effects. Researchers also analyze blood samples to study how the cancer develops resistance to treatment. This thorough monitoring helps understand long-term effects and how well the treatments control the cancer.

Researchers are investigating whether observation is as effective as continuing pembrolizumab treatment in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who achieved a complete response after preoperative chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. This phase III trial aims to evaluate recurrence-free survival and quality of life, as well as the value of reducing immunotherapy treatment after surgery in these patients. The study also examines differences in adverse events, overall survival, and financial impacts between treatment approaches. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab and surgery. One group receives pembrolizumab intravenously as adjuvant therapy, while the other group undergoes observation without further treatment. Both groups have tumor biopsies and blood samples collected on study and during follow-up. Additional assessments include questionnaires and quality-of-life evaluations. During the study, researchers monitor participants for up to 10 years to measure recurrence-free survival. They assess quality of life using validated tools, track adverse events, and evaluate financial toxicity and work productivity. The study includes tumor tissue analysis, blood sample collection, and patient-reported outcomes to understand the long-term effects and value of treatment de-escalation in breast cancer care.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term reliability and performance of Medtronic cardiac rhythm products, including leads and devices used for pacing, sensing, or defibrillation. The study aims to analyze product survival probabilities to better understand their durability and performance over time. This research includes all Medtronic market-released leads and implantable devices for conditions such as arrhythmia, bradycardia, heart failure, and sinus tachycardia. Participants include those who have been implanted with at least one Medtronic market-released product or those who participated in qualifying Medtronic studies with complete implant and follow-up data. The study monitors these devices from the time of implant, tracking lead-related complications and device performance. If a patient exits the study, passes away, or the device is deactivated, the implant is no longer followed. During the study, researchers collect health information and monitor the devices to assess ongoing performance and complications. Follow-up is essential to confirm device status and ensure accurate data collection. The main outcome measured is lead-related complications for each lead model, with continuous observation from implant until termination due to patient or device status. Participation requires informed consent and authorization for access to health information as per institutional requirements.

This research aims to continuously evaluate and report on the safety and effectiveness of Medtronic products that are already available on the market. It addresses a wide range of conditions including cardiac rhythm disorders, neurological and cardiovascular disorders, digestive issues, respiratory therapy, and various surgical and diagnostic procedures. The registry supports patients, hospitals, clinicians, regulatory bodies, payers, and industry by simplifying the clinical monitoring process and enhancing performance assessment. Participants in this registry are those who have received or are planned to receive treatment with eligible Medtronic products. Enrollment can occur within a specific time window relative to starting therapy or retrospectively. The study does not involve specific interventions but focuses on the ongoing collection of data related to the products in use. During participation, individuals will be monitored periodically every 6 to 12 months depending on their therapy. Researchers will collect data to assess safety and effectiveness without additional procedures beyond standard care. Follow-up will continue as long as the therapy is ongoing, with the goal of providing long-term surveillance and valuable information to improve patient care and product performance.