Lauderdale Lakes

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a kidney disease caused by the build-up of immune protein complexes in the kidneys, leading to inflammation and possible kidney damage. This Phase 3 study is evaluating how well mezagitamab, compared to a placebo, reduces protein levels in the urine (proteinuria) in adults with primary IgAN. It also aims to assess the safety and tolerability of mezagitamab and its ability to maintain kidney function over the long term. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups in the main study: two-thirds will receive mezagitamab injections under the skin, and one-third will receive placebo injections that look identical but have no active medicine. Treatment will occur in two 1-year cycles, each including about six months of dosing and six months of observation with monthly check-ups. An open-label group will include a small number of participants with lower proteinuria or kidney filtering issues, including those who previously received mezagitamab in another study; these participants will receive mezagitamab similarly to the main group. During the study, participants will visit the clinic several times for assessments. Researchers will monitor changes in proteinuria from the start through week 36, along with safety and kidney function. They will also perform regular evaluations and check-ups throughout each treatment and observation period to track participants' health and response to treatment.

Researchers are conducting a two-part, phase 2b/3 study to evaluate CSL300 (Clazakizumab) in adults with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis who have systemic inflammation and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes. The study aims to determine the best dose of CSL300 and assess its effects on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in this population. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial targets patients with elevated inflammation markers and significant health risks due to their conditions. In the first part (phase 2b), the study focuses on finding the appropriate dose of CSL300 compared to placebo. CSL300 is given through intravenous (IV) administration. The second part (phase 3) evaluates the impact of CSL300 on cardiovascular events such as heart attack or cardiovascular death over approximately 5 years, continuing to compare CSL300 to placebo for safety and efficacy. The placebo matches CSL300's excipient content but lacks the active drug. Participants will undergo baseline and regular assessments for inflammation markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) up to 12 weeks in phase 2b, and long-term monitoring for cardiovascular outcomes in phase 3. The study involves ongoing safety evaluations and efficacy measurements during the entire follow-up period. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand how CSL300 affects inflammation and cardiovascular health in patients with ESKD on dialysis.

Researchers are studying people with first episode psychosis to understand why some stop participating in coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs and how to help them stay engaged. The study aims to confirm a model that predicts which patients are at high risk of disengaging from CSC treatment and then test an intervention designed to reduce this risk. This research is part of a Phase 4 study focused on improving long-term care outcomes for these patients. The study has two phases. In Phase 1, researchers will confirm factors that predict disengagement from CSC. In Phase 2, participants identified as high risk will be offered a special Step-down intervention that uses web-based telemedicine and a smartphone app to help keep them involved in care. This intervention will be compared to the usual care provided by the CSC centers to see if it lowers the chance of patients dropping out. Participants enrolled in a CSC program will be monitored for at least six months to measure disengagement rates. Researchers will track who continues care and who stops, using the telemedicine tools and app to support those at risk. The study involves ongoing assessment of participant engagement and the effectiveness of the Step-down intervention to help maintain treatment involvement over time.

The project focuses on developing a learning health network aimed at improving the treatment of first episode psychosis (FEP). This effort builds on previous research showing that Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) can be effectively delivered in community mental health clinics across multiple states. The study involves sites from Connecticut, Florida, Michigan, Oklahoma, and South Carolina, each differing in population served, funding, and research experience, but all dedicated to advancing CSC treatment using a learning health system model. The treatment being evaluated is Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC), an integrated, team-based approach for first episode psychosis. CSC includes psychotherapy, supported employment and education, family education and support, and pharmacotherapy. The sites provide this comprehensive care as part of the project’s goal to implement practical assessments and improve meaningful outcomes for patients and stakeholders. Participants enrolled in the CSC programs will be involved in ongoing assessments to enhance outcome measurement and conduct research to improve patient results. The project will track the number of enrolled participants over five years. This long-term involvement allows the study to monitor treatment delivery and outcomes across diverse community mental health settings, with an emphasis on practical and meaningful improvements for those affected by early-phase schizophrenia.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

Researchers are evaluating VX-147 for its effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and how the body processes it in adults and children aged 10 to 65 who have apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1)-mediated proteinuric kidney disease. This study is a Phase 2/3 trial designed to better understand treatment options for this specific kidney condition. Participants will receive either VX-147 or a placebo, both given as oral tablets. The study is double-blind and placebo-controlled, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active drug or placebo during the treatment period. The trial consists of two parts: Part A focuses on treatment effects over at least 48 weeks, while Part B involves continued safety and tolerability observation for approximately four years after the last participant enrolls. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including measurements of urine protein to creatinine ratio and kidney function via estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Safety is monitored by tracking adverse events and serious adverse events. Data will be collected during the treatment period and followed long-term to evaluate both efficacy and safety outcomes, with some measures assessed at interim and final analyses over at least two years.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of benralizumab as an additional treatment for people aged 12 to 75 with uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma who are already using medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids combined with long-acting beta2-agonists (ICS-LABA). The study compares this approach to the usual care of increasing inhaled therapy to high-dose ICS-LABA. This is a global, phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial involving participants with a history of eosinophilic asthma. Participants receive either benralizumab 30 mg by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks for the first three doses and then every 8 weeks, alongside their medium-dose ICS-LABA treatment, or they receive a placebo injection with an increased high-dose ICS-LABA treatment. The study includes a run-in period to monitor compliance with usual asthma treatment and aims to assess adding benralizumab versus stepping up inhaled therapy. During the study, researchers monitor asthma control, lung function, and exacerbations over 48 weeks. Participants complete asthma diaries to track medication adherence and symptoms. The main outcome measured is the annual rate of asthma exacerbations. Safety and adverse events are also closely followed throughout the study period.