Meridian

Researchers are assessing the long-term safety of up to two injections of a gelatin-hydrogel formulation called Renal Autologous Cell Therapy (REACT) given 3 to 6 months apart into the same kidney. The study focuses on adults aged 30 to 80 years with chronic kidney disease, including those with diabetic kidney disease, who have previously received REACT in earlier clinical trials. This is a multi-center, prospective, observational extension study involving up to 80 participants who were enrolled and treated in previous interventional studies (RMCL-002, REGEN-003, REGEN-004). While no new interventions are administered during this follow-up, participants will be monitored closely to evaluate long-term safety outcomes. Participants will be followed for up to five years through a combination of in-clinic visits and phone calls. The study will track kidney function and other health indicators to assess safety over time. The primary outcome is the long-term safety of REACT, measured for 60 months after completion of the original studies. This extended monitoring ensures careful observation of any lasting effects from the prior treatments.

Researchers are investigating how bone mineral density changes during long-term treatment with the relugolix combination tablet in premenopausal women aged 18 to 50 who have heavy menstrual bleeding caused by uterine fibroids or moderate to severe pain related to endometriosis. This Phase 3B, single-arm, open-label study aims to assess the safety and effects of up to 48 months (4 years) of continuous treatment, followed by a 1-year post-treatment follow-up period. Participants will receive a daily fixed-dose tablet containing relugolix 40 mg, estradiol 1 mg, and norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg. Bone mineral density will be monitored every 6 months using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during treatment. Some women who completed a prior related study may join for 3 years of treatment under this protocol. After treatment ends or if stopped early, participants will be followed for 1 year with bone density checks at 6 and 12 months. Women in the study will have regular physical, gynecological, and laboratory assessments to monitor health and treatment effects. Researchers will measure the percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine after 48 months of treatment. Safety and health status will be closely observed throughout the treatment and follow-up periods to understand the long-term impact of the relugolix combination tablet on bone health.

Researchers are evaluating a new approach to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at increased risk due to age and conditions like type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, or metabolic syndrome but without known symptomatic cardiovascular disease. The study compares a Cleerly Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Staging System-based care strategy with standard risk factor-based care to see if the former can better reduce cardiovascular events. The Cleerly system uses imaging to visualize and quantify coronary artery disease and guides personalized treatment and education based on this assessment. The trial uses the Cleerly CAD Staging System device, which employs a proprietary algorithm to detect and stage coronary artery disease and generate a risk score to guide treatment decisions. Participants receive either this stage-based care or the usual care based on traditional risk factors. The study is prospective, randomized, and pragmatic, designed to follow patients over an average of 3.5 years to compare cardiovascular event outcomes between these two care approaches. Participants will be monitored through cardiovascular event tracking throughout the study period. Data collected includes imaging results, risk scores, and treatment adherence to evaluate the impact of the care strategies. The primary outcome is the comparison of cardiovascular event risk between the Cleerly stage-based care and risk factor-based care groups. The study also includes ongoing safety monitoring and personalized management by a cardiologist-led team via digital communication devices.

Researchers are evaluating how well two new study drugs, CagriSema and cagrilintide, help children and adolescents with excess body weight lose weight. This trial includes participants aged 8 to less than 18 years who have overweight or obesity. The study is designed in two parts: a main study and an extension study. The main study compares CagriSema, cagrilintide, semaglutide (an already approved drug), and placebo, with treatments assigned randomly. Participants receiving semaglutide will not continue to the extension study. The total time in the main study is about 1 year and 6 months, while those in the extension study may participate for up to about 4 years and 10 months. Participants in the main study will receive one of the four treatments by subcutaneous injection. In the extension study, participants will receive either CagriSema or cagrilintide. The study drugs are monitored closely for safety, and participants may experience side effects. The study compares these new treatments to a placebo and an existing approved drug to better understand their effects on weight management in young people. During the study, researchers will measure changes in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to week 68 as the primary outcome. Participants will undergo various assessments including laboratory tests and physical evaluations. The study tracks adherence to treatment and monitors safety throughout the study period. This comprehensive approach aims to provide detailed information about the efficacy and safety of these medications for managing weight in children and adolescents.

Researchers are evaluating ziltivekimab as a treatment for people living with heart failure and inflammation. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab to a placebo in participants with heart failure who have mild to preserved ejection fraction and systemic inflammation. The study aims to assess the effect of ziltivekimab on cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent heart failure visits over a period of up to 4 years. Participants will receive monthly injections of either ziltivekimab or a placebo using a pre-filled syringe or a pen-injector. The study medication is administered subcutaneously once a month for up to 4 years. The trial includes up to 20 clinic visits during which participants will be monitored and assessed. During the study, participants will use a study app on their phone to record all injections and complete questionnaires. Researchers will monitor participants for key outcomes like cardiovascular events and heart failure episodes from the time of randomization until the end of the study. Safety and health status will be regularly evaluated throughout the study period, which may last up to 48 months.

Researchers are evaluating a vaccine called BLB-201 for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and children aged 8 to 59 months. This Phase 1/2a randomized, placebo-controlled trial aims to study the safety, tolerability, and immune response after vaccination. Children included may have had prior RSV infection or not, allowing assessment in both seronegative and seropositive groups. The trial tests two doses of the BLB-201 vaccine: a low dose (10^6 PFU) and a high dose (10^7 PFU). Participants receive either one dose on Day 1 or two doses on Day 1 and Day 57. A placebo group receives a saline solution matching the low dose diluent. The study compares these groups to monitor how the vaccine is handled by the body and whether it produces an immune response. During the study, children are carefully monitored for side effects, including solicited adverse events from Day 1 to 15 and unsolicited events through Day 29. Their health is assessed through medical history, physical exams, and laboratory tests. Researchers track vaccine safety and immune response over the study period, with parents or guardians providing consent and helping with participation. The total study duration and follow-up ensure thorough evaluation of vaccine effects in young children.

Researchers are studying the immune response and safety of mRNA-1018-H5, a pandemic influenza vaccine, in adults aged 18 years and older. The trial aims to assess how well two doses of this vaccine trigger antibody production and to monitor any side effects or reactions. This is a Phase 3, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study focused on the influenza virus. Participants will receive either the mRNA-1018-H5 vaccine or a placebo, both provided as sterile liquid injections. The study involves two doses and includes detailed monitoring for immune response and side effects after vaccination. The trial compares the vaccine to a placebo to evaluate its immunogenicity and safety. During the study, individuals will undergo medical evaluations including physical exams and pregnancy testing if applicable. Researchers will measure antibody levels at Day 43 and record any local or systemic reactions up to Day 29 after injections, as well as any adverse events up to Day 205. The study tracks serious and medically-attended adverse events to ensure careful safety monitoring throughout the participation period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of SP-624 compared to a placebo in adults aged 18 to 65 with moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). This Phase 2B study focuses on treating this condition and assesses changes in depression severity using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from baseline to week 4. Participants receive either SP-624 or a placebo once daily. The SP-624 treatment consists of two capsules taken orally each day, providing a total dose of 20 mg. Those in the placebo group take two matching placebo capsules daily. The study is designed as a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. During the study, participants will be monitored for changes in depression severity through the MADRS assessment from the start of the study to week 4. Researchers will also evaluate safety and tolerability throughout the treatment period. The total study duration and specific follow-up details are not provided but include careful observation of participants' health and response to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating two treatment combinations for patients with melanoma that has spread to the brain and has a specific BRAF-V600 mutation. This phase II trial compares encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab against ipilimumab and nivolumab to determine which approach better controls and shrinks brain metastases from melanoma. The study also aims to assess overall survival, response rates, treatment duration, and side effects of each regimen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives encorafenib orally once daily, binimetinib orally twice daily, and nivolumab intravenously every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab intravenously and ipilimumab intravenously during the first four cycles, with cycles every 21 days initially, then every 28 days thereafter. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. After treatment ends, participants have follow-up visits every six months for two years, then yearly until three years after starting the study. During the trial, participants undergo brain MRIs to monitor tumor response using standardized criteria. Imaging, tumor tissue, spinal fluid, stool, and blood samples are collected for research. Safety and effectiveness are carefully assessed through scans, physical exams, lab tests, and side effect monitoring. Progression-free survival up to three years after randomization is the main outcome. Participants remain in the study for about three years with periodic evaluations to track their health and disease status.