Swansea

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous IV infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are studying an optimized treatment approach for participants with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkins lymphoma. This Phase II trial focuses on improving the cytokine release syndrome CRS profile when using glofitamab combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. The study aims to enable this treatment to be given safely in an outpatient setting through a special steroid premedication regimen and monitoring schedule. Participants receive intravenous obinutuzumab as a pre-treatment seven days before starting the main therapy. Then, they receive a combination of intravenous glofitamab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin for up to eight 21-day cycles, followed by glofitamab alone for up to twelve 21-day cycles. The treatment is given in a single group without placebo or comparison arms. During the study, participants are closely monitored for cytokine release syndrome and other responses to treatment. The main outcome measured is the incidence of CRS up to approximately five years. Researchers also assess response rates, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Safety and effectiveness are tracked through regular assessments and follow-up visits throughout the study period.

This trial investigates monitoring and treatment options for patients with low risk and standard risk metastatic germ cell tumors, which are cancers that start in the cells that produce sperm or eggs. The study aims to find out if active surveillance after surgical removal of low risk tumors can maintain high survival rates, and whether carboplatin or cisplatin chemotherapy works better for treating standard risk tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. Patients with low risk tumors undergo observation after surgery and may transfer to a standard risk treatment arm if the tumor recurs. Those with standard risk tumors are randomly assigned to receive one of two chemotherapy regimens one containing carboplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide, or the other containing cisplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide. Treatments are given intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to 3 or 4 cycles depending on the group. Throughout the study, patients have imaging scans, blood tests, tumor biopsies, and pulmonary function tests to monitor response and side effects. Participants are followed closely during treatment and afterward with regular check-ups including CT, MRI, and chest X-rays, as well as blood sample collections. Follow-up visits occur every 2 months for the first year, then every 3-6 months up to 2 years, every 6 months for years 3 to 5, and annually up to 10 years. Researchers measure overall survival, event-free survival, hearing loss, body composition, tumor markers, and patient-reported outcomes related to hearing and neuropathy. This long-term monitoring helps assess the effects and safety of chemotherapy and surveillance strategies.

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

This research aims to compare two methods of monitoring pancreatic cysts and to identify biomarkers that may help detect the risk of these cysts turning into pancreatic cancer. The study evaluates whether more frequent monitoring or less frequent monitoring leads to better patient outcomes and explores various blood and imaging biomarkers for improved risk prediction. Participants are observed through two different surveillance approaches that were previously randomized but are now closed to new enrollment. One approach involves lower intensity monitoring with MRI, CT, or endoscopic ultrasound EUS scans spaced out over years, while the other involves higher intensity monitoring with more frequent imaging based on cyst size. Throughout the study, patients may also provide blood samples and undergo biopsies, fine needle aspirations, or surgery as needed. Participants are followed up regularly for five years from registration, with imaging and blood tests at intervals depending on their assigned monitoring method. Researchers collect data on clinical features, anxiety, quality of life, financial distress, healthcare costs, and outcomes such as the development of concerning pancreatic cyst features or pancreatic cancer. The study uses these measures to assess the effectiveness of monitoring strategies and the predictive value of biomarkers.

This trial studies adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has spread outside the lungs and has specific mutations in the EGFR gene. Researchers are comparing two treatment approaches osimertinib alone versus osimertinib combined with bevacizumab. The study aims to evaluate how these treatments affect the time patients live without disease progression and overall survival, as well as their effects on brain metastases and treatment safety. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives osimertinib pills daily every 21 days, while the other group receives osimertinib daily plus an intravenous infusion of bevacizumab every 21 days. Treatment continues until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo tests including echocardiography, MUGA scans, CT scans, and possibly MRI, along with blood and urine sample collection. After treatment ends, participants are followed every three months for up to 10 years to monitor disease status and survival. Researchers will assess progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, time to brain progression, and side effects. The study includes long-term follow-up to understand the lasting effects of these treatments and to explore resistance mechanisms through tumor DNA analysis.

Researchers are evaluating how well radiation therapy with or without the chemotherapy drug cisplatin works in treating patients who have stage III-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after surgery. This phase II trial aims to understand if adding cisplatin to radiation therapy improves disease-free survival and to explore the role of p53 mutations as a biomarker for treatment benefit. The study also assesses the safety and side effects of these treatments and looks for other genetic changes that might guide new therapies. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives intensity-modulated radiation therapy IMRT once daily, five days a week for six weeks. The other group receives the same radiation schedule plus weekly intravenous cisplatin for six weeks. After treatment, participants are followed up every six months for three years and then yearly for seven years to monitor outcomes. During the study, patients will have assessments including surgical tumor tissue analysis for p53 mutation, imaging scans to check for cancer spread, and blood tests to monitor health and organ function. Researchers will track disease recurrence, new tumors, or death for up to 10 years. Side effects will be recorded during treatment. The total study participation includes treatment over six weeks followed by long-term follow-up visits lasting up to 10 years.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel versus the FOLFIRI regimen leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and irinotecan hydrochloride in treating patients with advanced or treatment-resistant small bowel adenocarcinoma. Ramucirumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets VEGFR-2 to potentially reduce tumor blood supply and growth. Chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and irinotecan work by stopping tumor cell growth through different mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. In the first group, patients receive ramucirumab intravenously over 30-60 minutes on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, with each cycle lasting 28 days. In the second group, patients receive irinotecan intravenously over 90 minutes on days 1 and 15, leucovorin intravenously over 2 hours on days 1 and 15, and fluorouracil both as an IV bolus on days 1 and 15 and continuously over 46-48 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17. Treatment cycles repeat every 28 days unless disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. During the study, patients are monitored with assessments every 8 weeks until their disease progresses. After progression, follow-up continues every 6 months for up to 3 years. Researchers measure progression-free survival, overall response rate, overall survival, and track any adverse events. Tissue and blood samples are also collected for future research. Patient safety and treatment effects are carefully evaluated throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating patients with metastatic HER-2-positive breast cancer who are receiving trastuzumab-based therapy and are at risk of heart problems. The study includes two groups one large observational group taking beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs alongside trastuzumab, and a smaller randomized group comparing the effects of carvedilol versus no treatment. The aim is to understand the occurrence of heart issues and whether carvedilol might help prevent cardiac side effects from chemotherapy. Participants are assigned to one of three arms based on their current medications. Patients not on beta blockers, ARBs, or ACE inhibitors are randomized to either receive carvedilol orally twice daily or no study intervention. Those already taking these heart medications enter an observational arm without additional treatment. Treatment and observation continue for up to 108 weeks unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the study, participants undergo heart function monitoring with echocardiograms every 12 weeks and provide blood samples for biomarker analysis. Researchers track the time to the first sign of heart dysfunction and any cardiac events, as well as adherence to medication and side effects. The study also collects data to develop models predicting heart risk and banks samples for future research. Participant involvement may last over two years with regular assessments to monitor safety and heart health.

Researchers are evaluating how well serum tumor marker directed disease monitoring STMDDM works compared to usual care in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This trial aims to see if monitoring with serum tumor markers can provide similar overall survival outcomes to the standard approach, which involves regular imaging scans. The study also looks at healthcare costs, patient anxiety, and quality of life related to these monitoring methods. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the usual care group, patients receive imaging studies at least every 12 weeks and may have serum tumor marker tests as determined by their doctor. In the STMDDM group, patients have blood tests for specific tumor markers every 4 to 8 weeks, and imaging scans are only done if these markers indicate a possible progression of disease. Both groups continue their monitoring for up to 312 weeks unless the disease progresses. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests for tumor markers, imaging scans as needed, and questionnaires about anxiety and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 312 weeks and compare healthcare costs and patient-reported outcomes for up to 48 to 102 weeks. The study also collects data on how often and by what methods disease monitoring is performed, along with patient and physician preferences related to monitoring.