Pascagoula

This research collects data and biological samples from patients who have experienced side effects from immunotherapy treatments for cancer. The goal is to create a national collection of these samples and clinical information to help future studies understand, predict, prevent, and treat serious immune-related side effects, rare infections, or rapid tumor growth after immunotherapy. Participants provide tissue and blood samples when they join the study and again one month later. Some patients may also provide stool samples if they have certain side effects like colitis. Researchers also review participants' medical records for up to one year to gather detailed health information related to their treatment and side effects. During the study, patients undergo sample collections and have their health records examined. The main outcome measured is the establishment of a national biorepository containing these samples and data, which will be used in future research over the course of one year. This study aims to support better understanding and management of immunotherapy side effects in cancer treatment.

Researchers are evaluating how factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect the development of side effects in patients with malignant solid tumors receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The study aims to develop and validate a risk prediction model for serious immune-related side effects during the first year of ICI treatment. Additional goals include tracking the occurrence of various side effects, quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, and treatment patterns over 12 months, along with studying biological markers that may predict side effect risk. Participants will have tissue samples collected at the start of their cancer treatment and will complete questionnaires at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Blood samples may also be collected at multiple times during the study. The study focuses on patients receiving standard-of-care ICI therapy for solid tumors, without combination chemotherapy or other non-ICI treatments. During the study, participants will complete patient-reported outcome forms and health questionnaires to assess side effects and quality of life. Researchers will monitor the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and evaluate biological markers from blood and tissue samples. The study also assesses the use of electronic methods for collecting patient data. Total participation includes assessments over approximately one year following treatment start.

Researchers are evaluating a screening and multi-sub-study randomized phase II/III trial called Lung-MAP, designed for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. The trial aims to establish a genomic screening method to assign patients to biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies. Depending on the cancer biomarker type, participants may receive new targeted cancer therapies or combinations compared to standard care, with the goal of approving new treatments. An optional ancillary study explores patient and physician attitudes about returning genetic findings related to germline mutations. The study involves testing patient specimens to determine eligibility for various sub-studies under the Lung-MAP protocol. Patients undergo screening to analyze tumor tissue and blood samples for biomarkers including PD-L1 and c-MET. Those requiring a fresh biopsy also submit blood for circulating tumor DNA testing. Sub-study assignment depends on the molecular profile results. This screening process includes both patients progressing after prior therapy and those pre-screened before progression on current treatment. Participants provide informed consent and tumor tissue that meets quality standards for testing. Researchers collect clinical data including smoking history and performance status. Outcomes focus on screening success, such as adequate tissue submission and matching to biomarker-driven sub-studies, tracked for up to three years. The study also monitors patient and physician knowledge and preferences regarding genomic findings. Participation duration varies based on screening and sub-study assignment.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

This research evaluates anonymous, previously collected medical data to review the outcomes of different treatment methods for chronic pain. The study is a retrospective review involving multiple centers and independent patient groups to compare results across various subgroups. The study examines clinical outcomes related to the use of spinal cord stimulation, radiofrequency (RF), and other implantable device systems from Boston Scientific and other manufacturers. Multiple cohorts will be analyzed based on the type of treatment system used. Participants' medical charts will be reviewed to measure response rates through approximately two years of follow-up. The study focuses on clinical results documented in patient records without any new treatment or intervention administered during the study.

Researchers are studying patients with metastatic HER-2-positive breast cancer who are receiving trastuzumab-based treatments to understand the risk of heart problems related to their cancer therapy. The study includes two groups: one large observational group of patients already taking beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs alongside their cancer treatment, and a smaller randomized group comparing patients who receive carvedilol, a heart medication, to those who do not. The trial aims to assess how often heart issues occur and whether carvedilol can help prevent heart damage from chemotherapy. It also investigates biomarkers and heart function measures as predictors of cardiac risk. In the randomized part, patients not already on beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs are assigned to receive carvedilol twice daily or no additional treatment for up to 108 weeks, with treatment cycles repeated every 12 weeks if there is no disease progression or unacceptable side effects. Patients already taking these heart medications join the observational cohort and are monitored for up to 108 weeks without any change in their therapy. The study collects blood samples and performs regular heart imaging to evaluate heart function and strain. Participants will have regular echocardiograms every 12 weeks to monitor heart function, with both local and central readings compared. Blood samples are collected for biomarker analysis, and patient health status is assessed throughout the study. The main outcome measured is the time until any heart dysfunction is first detected, followed for up to 108 weeks. The study also tracks interruptions in cancer therapy due to heart problems and explores genetic and plasma markers that might predict heart risk. Participants are followed closely for safety and treatment effects during the entire study period.

Researchers are evaluating how well serum tumor marker directed disease monitoring (STMDDM) works for patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. The study compares STMDDM with the usual care approach to see if overall survival is not worse using STMDDM. The trial also looks at healthcare costs, patient anxiety, quality of life, and preferences related to disease monitoring. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives usual care with imaging at least every 12 weeks and other monitoring at the doctor's discretion for up to 312 weeks if the disease does not progress. The other group has their serum tumor markers checked every 4 to 8 weeks, with imaging only if markers are elevated, also for up to 312 weeks without progression. Additional assessments include quality-of-life and anxiety questionnaires. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including imaging, blood tests for tumor markers, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Researchers track overall survival up to 312 weeks after randomization, along with healthcare costs and patient experiences. Participants must provide informed consent and are monitored for safety during the study period.