Secaucus

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and how the body processes Semaglutide Nasal Spray compared to a placebo and a known injection in adults who are overweight or obese. This Phase I clinical trial aims to better understand the effects of the nasal spray formulation of Semaglutide in this population. The study is sponsored by Shanghai World Leader Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and focuses on adults aged 18 to 65 years with specific body mass index ranges. Participants will receive either the Semaglutide Nasal Spray, placebo, or a Semaglutide injection Wegovy in different randomized groups. The study involves a single-dose administration and includes several cohorts receiving various combinations of the nasal spray and placebo or the injection. Treatments are given once, and the study monitors the participants for up to 36 days after administration to assess drug levels and effects. During the study, participants will undergo various evaluations including blood tests, vital signs monitoring, physical examinations, electrocardiograms ECGs, and urine analyses from Day 1 to Day 36. Researchers will measure how much of the drug reaches the blood, how long it stays, and any side effects that occur. Antibody levels against the drug will also be checked up to Day 29. Participants will be closely monitored for any safety concerns throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, immune response, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a candidate vaccine for urinary tract infections UTIs in adults aged 18 to 64 years. This trial focuses on adults generally for safety and immune response, and specifically on females with a history of at least one confirmed E. coli UTI within the past year for clinical efficacy. The study includes two parts an initial dose-escalation safety phase and a proof-of-principle efficacy phase, designed to establish the highest tolerated dose and evaluate the vaccines impact on UTI occurrence. Participants receive one of several vaccine dose formulations or placebo administered by injection on Day 1 and Day 61. Part 1 involves healthy male and female adults and tests increasing antigen doses for safety. After safety review, Part 2 enrolls females with previous E. coli UTIs to assess vaccine efficacy compared to placebo over a 12-month period. The vaccine is given intramuscularly following a 0 and 2 months schedule. Throughout the study, participants are monitored for side effects at the injection site and systemic reactions during the first week after each dose, as well as for any adverse events up to 426 days from the first dose. Blood tests, pregnancy monitoring, and clinical exams are conducted. The main outcome measures include the frequency of adverse events and the rate of urine culture confirmed UTIs in females during the follow-up period. Participants are followed closely for safety and immune response, with the trial lasting over a year from initial vaccination.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Researchers are evaluating olpasiran, compared to a placebo, to see how it affects the risk of coronary heart disease death, heart attacks, or urgent coronary revascularization in people at risk for their first major cardiovascular event who have high levels of lipoproteina. This Phase 3 study focuses on participants aged 50 to 105 years with multiple cardiovascular risk factors or evidence of atherosclerosis. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either olpasiran or a placebo through subcutaneous injections. The study is double-blind, so neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active drug or placebo. Treatments and evaluations will continue for up to approximately 6.2 years. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for heart-related events such as heart attacks, cardiovascular death, strokes, and coronary revascularizations. Researchers will also measure changes in lipoproteina levels at baseline and at Week 48, along with tracking adverse events. The total participation duration can extend up to about 6.2 years, with ongoing assessments to evaluate the treatments effect over time.

Researchers are evaluating an outreach campaign to increase participation in Pack Health, a wellness program by Quest Diagnostics that offers personalized health coaching for weight management and diabetes prevention. The study focuses on employees and their spouses or domestic partners who have metabolic syndrome, a condition defined by having three or more specific risk factors. The goal is to see if automatically enrolling eligible individuals, with the option to opt out, improves engagement and health outcomes compared to the usual invitation-based approach. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups the intervention group receives outreach that automatically enrolls them in the program and invites them to begin their first session, while the control group receives the standard invitation to join. The study compares these two outreach methods over time to determine which leads to higher engagement and better health results. During the study, researchers will track how many participants start and continue the program, the number of program modules completed, changes in health measures like HbA1c and weight over two years, and employee retention after one year. The main measurement is the likelihood that participants begin the program within 12 months. The study will run until August 2026, with ongoing assessments through healthcare claims and risk evaluations to monitor outcomes and program effectiveness.