West Islip

Researchers are evaluating whether adding the immunotherapy drug durvalumab to the usual chemotherapy regimen can improve outcomes for patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk MP2 stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial focuses on comparing breast cancer event-free survival and other measures between patients receiving chemotherapy alone and those receiving chemotherapy with durvalumab. Immunotherapy may help enhance the bodys immune response against cancer, while chemotherapy works to stop tumor growth in various ways. Participants are first tested for MP2 status using MammaPrint on previously collected tissue. Those with MP2 results are randomized into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for six cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously every 14 days for four cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule combined with durvalumab given intravenously over 60 minutes on specific cycles. Mammography and optional tumor tissue and blood sample collections occur during the study. During the study, participants undergo assessments including mammography, tumor biopsies, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers measure outcomes such as event-free survival, response rates, relapse-free survival, overall survival, treatment side effects, and patient-reported fatigue and physical health. After treatment completion, participants are followed for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and survival. Specimens are also banked for future research.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with stage IV or recurring non-small cell lung cancer who have previously received platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This phase IIIII trial compares the effects of adding cemiplimab, an immune system-stimulating monoclonal antibody, to the usual combination of docetaxel and ramucirumab. The goal is to see if adding cemiplimab helps the immune system better attack tumor cells and improves survival outcomes. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives docetaxel and ramucirumab along with dexamethasone, while the other group receives these same treatments plus cemiplimab. Treatments are given in cycles every 21 days, with infusions lasting from 30 minutes to an hour depending on the drug. Patients undergo regular blood sample collections and imaging scans such as CT or MRI throughout the study. During the trial, participants are monitored for overall survival, disease progression, tumor response, and side effects. After completing treatment, follow-up visits occur every 3 to 6 months for up to 3 years. Blood tests and imaging help assess treatment effects and safety. Researchers also collect and store blood and tissue samples to support future studies.

Researchers are collecting samples and information from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDAC who will receive standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatments, either FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel. The study aims to identify blood or tumor tissue biomarkers that might help predict how patients respond to these treatments. This could support selecting the most appropriate therapy for future patients with similar biomarkers. Participants will undergo standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on current care guidelines. Two groups are observed patients with borderline resectable PDAC and those with resectable PDAC, classified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Blood samples and archival tumor tissue will be collected to analyze potential biomarkers related to treatment response. During the study, participants pathological responses to treatment will be retrospectively assessed for up to two years. Additional outcomes include survival status and tumor response evaluation using RECIST 1.1 criteria. The study involves monitoring patients clinical data and collecting biological samples without altering their usual care, aiming to gather information that could guide future treatment decisions.

Researchers are studying an early intervention led by an oncology clinical nurse specialist that uses a multidisciplinary approach to palliative and survivorship care for adults with metastatic solid tumor malignancies. This randomized control trial aims to compare this nurse-led care model to the standard palliative care approach, focusing on patient-reported symptom burden, overall quality of life, distress, and overall survival. The study targets patients in favorable and very favorable risk groups to evaluate the impact on symptoms like pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, and wellbeing. Participants will be assigned randomly to either the nurse-specialist-led intervention or the standard care group. The intervention group receives usual care plus additional coordinated services, patient education, referrals, and ongoing support from the oncology nurse-specialist, including in-person visits and scheduled telephone follow-ups. The standard care group follows usual clinical guidelines with physician and nursing visits scheduled typically at 3, 9, 15, and 24 months. Both groups will complete surveys at multiple timepoints to assess symptoms and quality of life throughout the study period. During the 24-month study, participants will complete validated questionnaires to report symptoms, distress, and quality of life, supported by nursing staff. Data collection occurs at six timepoints using brief surveys that take about 5-6 minutes each. The research team will monitor safety regularly, tracking any adverse events. Survival data will be followed for up to 60 months. Participants can withdraw at any time without affecting their medical care. Total survey time is about 50 minutes for standard care and 85 minutes for the intervention group over 24 months.

Researchers are evaluating how doctors use the Percepta4 Nasal Swab test results to manage patients with newly found pulmonary nodules. This observational study aims to see if the test helps reduce invasive procedures in patients with low-risk benign nodules and speeds up treatment for those with high-risk cancerous nodules. The study is prospective, multicenter, and randomized, involving patients whose nodules were found incidentally or through lung cancer screening. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups one where the Percepta Nasal Swab test result is given to the physician and one where it is not. The study will compare how doctors manage patients nodules with and without access to the test result. About 2400 participants will be enrolled across up to 100 US centers, with enrollment lasting around 24 months. Follow-up will continue for 24 to 30 months or until a lung cancer diagnosis. During the study, researchers will track the number of invasive diagnostic procedures from randomization until the nodule is confirmed benign or stable for up to 30 months. They will also measure the time from randomization to the start of lung cancer treatment. Participants will undergo nasal specimen collection, and clinical history and imaging data will be reviewed. The study observes routine care decisions influenced by the test, without altering standard treatment plans.

Researchers are comparing two treatment approaches for patients with stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that can be removed by surgery. The study evaluates whether giving standard therapy before and after surgery perioperative is better than giving it only after surgery adjuvant. This phase III trial focuses on chemotherapy and immunotherapy, which are current standard treatments aimed at controlling tumor growth and helping the immune system fight cancer. Patients are divided into two groups. One group undergoes surgery followed by chemotherapy and immunotherapy for up to one year if the disease does not progress or cause severe side effects. The other group receives chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy before surgery, then surgery, followed by immunotherapy alone for up to one year. Chemotherapy drugs may include cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, docetaxel, or vinorelbine. Imaging tests like CT, MRI, or PETCT scans are done throughout the study. Participants will have surgery within a month of joining and receive treatments according to their assigned group. They will be monitored with scans and followed up every six months for up to 10 years to assess survival, disease progression, surgical outcomes, side effects, and immune responses. Researchers will measure event-free survival and overall survival as main results, as well as response rates and safety information over the long term.

Researchers are studying premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, focusing on tumors with specific gene recurrence scores. The trial aims to find out if adding chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy improves invasive breast cancer-free survival compared to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy alone. This Phase III trial addresses the need for better treatments in younger women, given their higher risk and past conflicting study results on ovarian suppression and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ovarian function suppression combined with an aromatase inhibitor for five years, and the other receiving adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitor regimen. Choices for the aromatase inhibitor and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist are made by the investigator, with options including drugs such as goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin. Endocrine treatment beyond five years is at the investigators discretion, and bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. During the study, participants are monitored over 11 years from randomization, with measurements including invasive breast cancer-free survival as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence intervals, menopausal symptoms, and pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Safety and treatment effects are assessed through regular evaluations, and participants continue to be followed long term to understand the impact of treatments on their breast cancer outcomes.

Researchers are studying how certain factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect whether patients with malignant solid tumors develop mild or serious side effects from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. This observational study aims to develop and validate a model that predicts severe immune-related side effects during the first year of immunotherapy, while also assessing quality of life and adverse events over 12 months. The study is sponsored by the SWOG Cancer Research Network and includes translational medicine goals such as evaluating cytokine levels as predictors and establishing a tissue and blood sample repository. Participants will provide a tissue sample at the start of their routine cancer treatment and complete questionnaires at multiple time points at treatment start, and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. They may also provide optional blood samples during the study. This design allows researchers to monitor immune-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes over time. During the study, participants will complete various questionnaires to report their quality of life, cognitive function, and side effects. Blood and tissue samples will be analyzed to explore predictive markers of toxicity. Researchers will track the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and assess changes in patient-reported outcomes. The study includes ongoing monitoring and data collection, with participation lasting approximately one year from treatment start.

Researchers are evaluating a master screening protocol called Lung-MAP for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. This phase IIIII trial aims to develop a genomic screening method for large cancer populations and assign participants to appropriate sub-studies based on specific cancer biomarkers. The goal is to compare new targeted therapies designed to block cancer growth or spread with standard care, including sub-studies for patients not eligible for biomarker-driven treatments. The study involves screening patient specimens to determine eligibility for various biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. This is a screening study without direct interventions instead, patients are assigned to different treatment sub-studies, each operating independently. The protocol also includes an optional ancillary study evaluating attitudes about the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of germline mutations. Participants provide tumor tissue for biomarker testing, including molecular profiling and PD-L1 analysis, and may submit fresh biopsies and blood samples for circulating tumor DNA testing. Researchers will monitor screening success rates up to three years and collect patient and physician feedback on genetic findings. Participation involves signing informed consent, providing smoking history, and possibly completing surveys. The study duration and assessments vary depending on sub-study assignment and patient progression.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.