Albany

This research aims to compare two approaches for treating previously untreated amblyopia in children aged 3 to under 13 years. It evaluates whether using glasses and patching at the same time leads to similar improvements in vision as first using glasses alone, followed by patching only if needed. The trial focuses on children with amblyopia caused by differences in eye alignment or prescription errors. Children will be assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups one group will wear glasses full-time and add patching for 2 hours daily only if there is no improvement after glasses alone the other group will wear glasses and patch the weaker eye for 2 hours daily at the same time from the start. Vision tests will be done at baseline and follow-up visits every 8 weeks for up to 56 weeks. Participants will have their distance visual acuity measured with trial frames before and after getting their glasses to confirm eligibility. During the study, vision will be monitored to classify improvement or stability, guiding whether patching is needed in the sequential group. Outcomes include changes in vision clarity after 56 weeks and quality-of-life assessments. Regular visits help track progress and safety until study completion.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of disitamab vedotin for treating adults with advanced breast cancer that is difficult to treat and has spread in the body. The study focuses on patients whose tumors express HER2 and who have previously received treatment for their advanced breast cancer. This open-label, non-randomized study is sponsored by Pfizer and includes multiple groups based on HER2 and hormone receptor status. All participants will receive disitamab vedotin as an intravenous infusion every two weeks at the study clinic. The treatment continues until either the participant or doctor decides to stop, which may be due to cancer progression, side effects, or personal choice. After stopping treatment, participants will have follow-up visits about every six weeks, followed by phone calls every twelve weeks to monitor their health. During the study, participants will attend visits every two weeks for treatment and assessments. Researchers will evaluate tumor response, duration of response, disease control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and drug levels in the blood. Safety will be monitored for up to two years, and participants can expect regular checkups and tests throughout the study period, which may last up to three years.

Researchers are evaluating dichoptic treatments for children aged 8 to 12 years with amblyopia, a condition affecting vision. This phase 3 randomized trial compares two types of virtual reality-based dichoptic therapy, Luminopia and Vivid Vision, against continued use of optical correction alone. The study aims to understand how these treatments impact vision improvement, specifically measuring changes in the amblyopic eyes visual acuity. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups Luminopia, involving watching dichoptic movies or shows using a headset for 1 hour daily six days a week Vivid Vision, playing dichoptic video games with a headset for about 25 minutes daily six days a week or continuing optical correction with glasses or contact lenses alone. Those initially assigned to optical correction alone who show limited improvement after 18 weeks may be re-randomized to receive one of the dichoptic therapies, with follow-up visits extending to 36 weeks. During the study, participants attend clinical assessments at 9 and 18 weeks after starting treatment, with additional visits at 27 and 36 weeks for some. Researchers measure visual acuity changes in the amblyopic eye using the logMAR scale and assess quality of life related to vision through a pediatric eye questionnaire. The study includes monitoring adherence to treatment, willingness to wear the headset and optical correction, and safety considerations throughout the 18 to 36-week participation period.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Researchers are evaluating a new medicine called PF-08634404 combined with chemotherapy for adults with colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. The study aims to understand how well this new combination works compared to an existing treatment using Bevacizumab with chemotherapy. The study is a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial focusing on treatment effectiveness and safety in participants who have not received prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives PF-08634404 with chemotherapy, and the other group receives Bevacizumab with chemotherapy. Both treatments are given through intravenous IV infusions in cycles. Treatment continues as long as it helps and side effects are manageable. Treatments are administered at clinical sites by trained staff. Participants will have regular visits for treatment, health evaluations, and various tests. After stopping treatment, there is a follow-up visit about 30 to 37 days later to review health and side effects. Further follow-up occurs every 12 weeks by phone, in person, or via health record review to monitor health status and any new treatments. The study duration for each participant is approximately 33 months. Researchers will measure progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, quality of life, and monitor safety throughout the study.