Pottstown

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of IMVT-1402 in adults with Graves' disease who continue to have hyperthyroidism despite treatment with antithyroid drugs (ATD). This Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to compare IMVT-1402 with placebo by measuring thyroid hormone levels and ATD dose after 26 weeks. Participants will receive IMVT-1402 as a 600 mg injection under the skin once a week for either 52 weeks, or for 26 weeks followed by placebo injections for another 26 weeks. The placebo group will receive weekly placebo injections for 52 weeks. This design allows assessment of the drug's effects over time compared to placebo. During the study, participants will be monitored through laboratory tests measuring thyroid hormones (T3, FT4, TSH) to determine if they achieve normal thyroid function without ATD by Week 26. Safety and tolerability will also be evaluated throughout the treatment period. Participants must be adults between 18 and 75 years old and able to comply with study procedures.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of TP-05 in healthy adults who are at high risk of tick exposure and Lyme disease. This Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to understand how TP-05 performs compared to a placebo in preventing Lyme borreliosis. The study enrolls adults aged 18 to 70 years who are overtly healthy and able to comply with study procedures. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a low dose or high dose of TP-05 or a matching placebo, all administered orally according to a predefined dosing schedule. The study includes a screening period, a treatment period lasting up to 24 weeks, and a safety follow-up period. During treatment, participants will be monitored closely for any adverse effects and signs of Lyme borreliosis. Throughout the study, participants will undergo safety assessments including monitoring of adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical exams, and electrocardiograms. Researchers will follow participants for approximately 15 months to track safety outcomes and any tick bites or symptoms of Lyme disease. Key measures include changes from baseline in laboratory results, vital signs, and ECG parameters, ensuring thorough safety evaluation over the study course.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to study and evaluate tests that could help detect cancer early. The goal is to create a blinded reference set of samples to validate blood-based tests for early detection of multiple types of cancer, including leukemia, lymphoma, breast, lung, and others. The study also aims to assess how well these tests perform at the time of initial cancer diagnosis, considering different tumor types and cancer stages. Participants complete a baseline questionnaire and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also provide tissue samples at these times. The study includes patients aged 40 to 75 years, with cancer diagnoses at various stages or individuals without cancer. Special procedures are in place for patients with high suspicion of certain cancers before confirmation. During the study, researchers collect detailed information through questionnaires, blood draws, and tissue sampling to analyze test accuracy. Participants are monitored for up to one year after registration to follow outcomes. The primary measure is providing this blinded set of blood samples to help validate future cancer detection tests, supporting research that could improve early diagnosis and treatment.

This research collects data and biological samples from patients who have experienced side effects from immunotherapy treatments for cancer. The goal is to create a national collection of these samples and clinical information to help future studies understand, predict, prevent, and treat serious immune-related side effects, rare infections, or rapid tumor growth after immunotherapy. Participants provide tissue and blood samples when they join the study and again one month later. Some patients may also provide stool samples if they have certain side effects like colitis. Researchers also review participants' medical records for up to one year to gather detailed health information related to their treatment and side effects. During the study, patients undergo sample collections and have their health records examined. The main outcome measured is the establishment of a national biorepository containing these samples and data, which will be used in future research over the course of one year. This study aims to support better understanding and management of immunotherapy side effects in cancer treatment.

Researchers are evaluating how factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect the development of side effects in patients with malignant solid tumors receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The study aims to develop and validate a risk prediction model for serious immune-related side effects during the first year of ICI treatment. Additional goals include tracking the occurrence of various side effects, quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, and treatment patterns over 12 months, along with studying biological markers that may predict side effect risk. Participants will have tissue samples collected at the start of their cancer treatment and will complete questionnaires at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Blood samples may also be collected at multiple times during the study. The study focuses on patients receiving standard-of-care ICI therapy for solid tumors, without combination chemotherapy or other non-ICI treatments. During the study, participants will complete patient-reported outcome forms and health questionnaires to assess side effects and quality of life. Researchers will monitor the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and evaluate biological markers from blood and tissue samples. The study also assesses the use of electronic methods for collecting patient data. Total participation includes assessments over approximately one year following treatment start.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma in this phase III trial. The study compares the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone given with or without daratumumab. These drugs work in different ways to stop tumor growth, and the combination with daratumumab, an immunotherapy, may better interfere with tumor cell growth and spread. The trial aims to assess overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment safety, and quality of life among participants. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives daratumumab intravenously on specific days across up to 24 cycles, combined with daily oral lenalidomide for 21 days and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for 12 cycles. The other group receives only lenalidomide and dexamethasone on the same schedule for up to 24 cycles. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and patient questionnaires to monitor treatment effects and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 15 years, evaluate minimal residual disease, and monitor medication adherence and adverse events. Follow-up visits occur every 3, 6, or 12 months after treatment ends to continue monitoring health outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating a screening and multi-sub-study randomized phase II/III trial called Lung-MAP, designed for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. The trial aims to establish a genomic screening method to assign patients to biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies. Depending on the cancer biomarker type, participants may receive new targeted cancer therapies or combinations compared to standard care, with the goal of approving new treatments. An optional ancillary study explores patient and physician attitudes about returning genetic findings related to germline mutations. The study involves testing patient specimens to determine eligibility for various sub-studies under the Lung-MAP protocol. Patients undergo screening to analyze tumor tissue and blood samples for biomarkers including PD-L1 and c-MET. Those requiring a fresh biopsy also submit blood for circulating tumor DNA testing. Sub-study assignment depends on the molecular profile results. This screening process includes both patients progressing after prior therapy and those pre-screened before progression on current treatment. Participants provide informed consent and tumor tissue that meets quality standards for testing. Researchers collect clinical data including smoking history and performance status. Outcomes focus on screening success, such as adequate tissue submission and matching to biomarker-driven sub-studies, tracked for up to three years. The study also monitors patient and physician knowledge and preferences regarding genomic findings. Participation duration varies based on screening and sub-study assignment.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

Researchers are investigating the effect of olpasiran compared to a placebo in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease death, heart attack, or urgent coronary revascularization in people at risk for their first major cardiovascular event who have elevated lipoprotein(a) levels. This Phase 3 study focuses on participants aged 50 years and older with multiple cardiovascular risk factors or evidence of atherosclerosis. The goal is to understand whether olpasiran can help prevent these serious heart-related events in this population. Participants will receive either olpasiran or a placebo through subcutaneous injections. The study is double-blind and randomized, meaning neither participants nor researchers will know who receives the active drug or placebo. The intervention period and follow-up will continue for up to approximately 6.2 years to monitor the occurrence of major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for outcomes including time to coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, or urgent coronary revascularization. Regular assessments will be performed to track cardiovascular health and safety. The long observation period aims to ensure thorough evaluation of olpasiran's impact on preventing first major cardiovascular events in people with elevated lipoprotein(a).

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of radiation therapy with or without the chemotherapy drug cisplatin in patients with stage III-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who have had surgery to remove their tumors. This phase II trial aims to understand if adding cisplatin to radiation therapy improves disease-free survival, especially considering the role of p53 mutations in the cancer cells. The study also investigates toxicities and potential genomic factors that might influence treatment outcomes. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone once daily, five days a week for six weeks. The other group receives the same radiation treatment combined with weekly intravenous cisplatin over one to two hours, also for six weeks. Treatment continues as long as there is no disease progression or unacceptable side effects. During the study, participants undergo regular follow-ups every six months for three years and then yearly for seven more years to monitor for cancer recurrence or new tumors. Researchers assess disease-free survival, tracking the time from randomization until cancer returns, a second tumor develops, or death. Additional laboratory tests and biomarker analyses are performed to understand genetic changes and treatment effects. Safety and toxicities are closely monitored throughout the study period.