South Ogden

Researchers are studying the effectiveness and safety of a combination inhaler containing fluticasone propionate and albuterol sulfate delivered through a multidose dry powder inhaler with an electronic module (Fp/ABS eMDPI). This Phase 3 trial focuses on people aged 12 years and older who have asthma. The study also looks at the safety and tolerability of this inhaler when used four times daily over four weeks, as well as the pharmacokinetics of the combination and its individual components after a single dose. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the Fp/ABS combination inhaler, fluticasone propionate alone, albuterol sulfate alone, or a placebo inhaler. All treatments are given as inhalation powders. The main treatment period lasts four weeks, during which the inhalers are taken four times a day. The total study duration for each participant is about 10 weeks, not counting an optional prescreening visit. Throughout the study, researchers will measure lung function changes, specifically forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), from baseline to week 4. Participants will undergo assessments including lung function tests and safety evaluations. The study monitors how the inhaler affects breathing over time and checks for any side effects or tolerability issues during the treatment period.

Researchers are investigating the safety and effectiveness of efruxifermin in people with non-cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) who have moderate to advanced liver fibrosis (stage 2 or 3). This Phase 3 study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, enrolling a total of 1650 participants in two groups to evaluate treatment outcomes. Participants will receive either efruxifermin or a placebo by subcutaneous injection. The study involves two cohorts, with Cohort 1 including patients who have biopsy-confirmed NASH or MASH and specific liver fibrosis and activity scores. The treatment period and detailed dosing schedules are not provided but the study compares the effects of the active drug against placebo. During the study, participants will be monitored for improvement in liver disease status, including resolution of NASH/MASH and at least a one-stage improvement in liver fibrosis after 52 weeks for Cohort 1. Long-term outcomes such as event-free survival will be observed over 240 weeks. Safety and efficacy assessments will be conducted throughout the study period, including evaluations of liver histology and metabolic health.

Researchers are evaluating a clinical decision support (CDS) tool called ePNa, originally designed for emergency departments, to improve pneumonia diagnosis and treatment in urgent care clinics in Utah. This study focuses on adapting ePNa for use in urgent care centers (UCCs), where pneumonia patients are frequently seen, and combining it with Stanford's CheXED artificial intelligence model to enhance chest image analysis. The goal is to implement and test this adapted tool to support clinicians in making accurate and timely pneumonia care decisions, especially as diagnostic and treatment methods evolve during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study involves adapting ePNa to fit the data limitations and workflow of urgent care clinics, incorporating AI-based chest image classification that provides results in less than one second. The adapted tool will be piloted with selected "super user" clinicians and then deployed to one of two randomly chosen UCC clusters, while the other cluster continues usual care. The implementation process will follow the CFIR framework for best practices in integrating new clinical tools, including identifying barriers and facilitators through focus groups, interviews, and workflow observation. Participants include pneumonia patients aged 12 years and older with specific diagnostic codes, and clinicians working in the selected urgent care clinics. The study will collect data on pneumonia diagnosis accuracy, patient transfers to emergency departments, and safety outcomes like unplanned hospital visits and mortality within 30 days. Physician surveys will assess user experience with ePNa. The study is planned to last up to three years, with ongoing monitoring of how ePNa impacts urgent care clinical environments.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.