Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years - 80Years
FEMALE
ID07290114

Mesh-Free Versus Mesh-Based Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Comparison of Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication and Transobturator Tape With Short-Term Patient-Centered Outcomes

Led by Mehmet Incebıyik · Updated on 2025-12-18

147

Participants Needed

1

Research Sites

13 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are comparing two surgical methods for treating female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) to understand their short-term effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction. The study looks at Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP), a mesh-free native tissue repair, and Transobturator Tape (TOT), a mesh-based sling technique. The goal is to see if the mesh-free PLP offers similar outcomes to the more common mesh-based TOT, especially for patients preferring to avoid synthetic materials. Participants diagnosed with SUI who choose surgery will undergo either the PLP or TOT procedure based on shared decision-making with their surgeon. PLP strengthens urethral support by folding native tissues without mesh, while TOT places a synthetic tape under the midurethra using the transobturator route. The study collects data on surgery details, complications, pain, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction during follow-up visits. During the study, continence improvement will be measured using questionnaires like the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and clinical exams 6 to 24 weeks after surgery. Researchers will also monitor pain, urinary retention, new urgency symptoms, wound healing, and overall satisfaction. Participants will attend postoperative follow-ups to help evaluate the outcomes and safety of each surgical technique.

CONDITIONS

Brief Title

Mesh-Free Versus Mesh-Based Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Comparison of Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication and Transobturator Tape

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years - 80Years
FEMALE

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Female patients aged 18 to 80 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence
  • Failure of conservative management such as pelvic floor exercises or medical therapy
  • Desire to undergo surgical treatment with either PLP or TOT
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Willingness to attend postoperative follow-up visits
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge symptoms
  • Active urinary tract infection
  • Pelvic organ prolapse stage II or greater
  • Previous anti-incontinence surgery
  • Neurological diseases affecting bladder function
  • Pregnancy or planning pregnancy during follow-up
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, bleeding disorders, or contraindications to surgery
  • Use of medications affecting bladder function such as anticholinergics
  • Inability to provide informed consent

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Your Study Journey

Screening

Duration - 2 to 4 weeks

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.

1 visit (in-person)

Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care

Duration - Up to hospital discharge

Participants undergo one of two surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence: mesh-free Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP) or mesh-based Transobturator Tape (TOT). Immediate recovery and hospital discharge occur after surgery.

1 surgery visit and hospital stay

Post-operative Follow-up

Duration - 6 to 24 weeks postoperatively

Participants attend follow-up visits to assess continence improvement, pain levels, urinary symptoms, wound healing, and patient satisfaction using questionnaires and clinical evaluations.

Multiple follow-up visits during this period

Trial Site Locations

Total: 1 location

1

Harran University Research and Application Hospital

Şanliurfa, HALİLİYE, Turkey (Türkiye), 63300

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

M

Mehmet İNCEBIYIK, MD

Ö

Ömer TAMMO, MD

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

NONE

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Number of Arms

2

Similar Trials

Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the UrOActiv...

Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Actively Recruiting

21 locations

Exploratory Safety and Feasibility Study of Personalized Ada...

Mixed Urinary Incontinence

Actively Recruiting

7 locations

A Single Arm Pilot Study of the Chinese Herbal Medicine Form...

Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Actively Recruiting

1 location

Frequently Asked Questions

Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here