Comparison of Nylon and Polyurethane Epidural Catheters for Major Orthopedic Surgery under Continuous Epidural Anesthesia

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are comparing the safety and effectiveness of nylon polyamide versus polyurethane epidural catheters in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery using continuous epidural anesthesia. This study addresses common complications associated with epidural catheters such as improper placement, nerve irritation, catheter kinking, hematoma, or breakage during removal. The trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study involving 60 patients. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one group receives continuous epidural anesthesia with a nylon catheter, while the other group receives a polyurethane catheter. Each group includes 30 patients. The study evaluates the time required for catheter insertion, anchoring, and removal, as well as the rate of catheter-related complications. The interventions take place during the course of major orthopedic surgery. Throughout the study, researchers measure the time taken for key procedures involving the epidural catheter, including insertion and removal, and monitor for any catheter-related complications. These measurements occur shortly after identifying the epidural space, after needle removal, and at the end of the operation. The trial follows patients aged 21 to 60 years with specific health criteria, ensuring close monitoring of anesthesia performance and safety outcomes.

Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery