Comparing Piezo Surgery and Conventional Techniques for One Stage Ridge Splitting and Implant Placement in the Upper Jaw
Led by Cairo University · Updated on 2025-07-16
20
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
13 weeks
Total Duration
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are evaluating two techniques for ridge splitting in the upper jaw maxilla to support dental implants. The study compares a conventional method using bone discs with an approach using piezo surgery, aiming to assess bone gain quality and healing outcomes in patients with specific bone conditions and missing teeth. This is an interventional trial sponsored by Cairo University involving adults aged 20 to 48 years.
Both groups undergo similar surgical steps including local anesthesia, flap creation, bone exposure, and implant placement below the bone crest. The study group receives piezo surgery bone inserts to cut the crestal osteotomy, while the control group uses bone discs mounted on handpieces for the same purpose. Additional procedures include bone chiseling, implant drilling, bone smoothing, and placement of xenogenic bone particles into the surgical site. Closure is performed with a double line suture technique to ensure tension-free healing.
Participants will have cone beam computed tomography CBCT scans before and four months after surgery to evaluate bone gain. Other assessments include evaluation of soft tissue healing one week after surgery. The study involves randomized allocation to one of the two surgical techniques with single blinding. Monitoring includes clinical evaluations of bone and soft tissue, with the primary outcome measured four months after ridge augmentation, and a total participation duration covering preoperative assessment through postoperative follow-up.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
One Stage Ridge Splitting Using 2 Different Techniques in Maxilla
Research Team
M
Mohannad A. Ismail, MSc.
A
Ahmed M Youssef, PhD
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match. Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Hourglass defects or defects with bone concavities or undercuts in the graft site
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care
Duration - Single day for surgery
Participants undergo one-stage ridge splitting surgery using either the conventional technique with bone discs or piezo surgery. Local anesthesia is administered, and implants are placed followed by bone grafting and wound closure.
1 surgical visit (in-person)
Post-operative Follow-up
Duration - 4 months
Participants receive follow-up care including CBCT imaging and assessment of bone quality and soft tissue healing after surgery.
1 follow-up visit at 4 months post-surgery
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Similar Trials
Randomized Comparison of Hydrogel-Enhanced Xenograft and Graftless Method for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
Assessing Bone Growth and Tissue Healing for Dental Implant Placement
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Flapless Immediate Implant Placement Using Titanium Mesh Versus Collagen Membrane in Type II Extraction Sockets
Study of Bone Augmentation During Implant Removal to Improve Reimplantation Success
for Adults Aged 18 to 90 with Implant Failure
Comparing Timing of Free Gingival Graft and Guided Bone Regeneration
for Ridge Augmentation Before Dental Implant Placement
Observational Study on Safety and Performance of Neobone4 in Adult Dental Bone Reconstruction
Observational Study Evaluating Safety and Performance of Neocement Inject P in Dental Bone Reconstruction
Comparing Immediate Implant Placement, Alveolar Ridge Preservation, and Delayed Implant Placement After Tooth Extraction in the Front Teeth Area
Comparing Piezo Surgery and Conventional Techniques for One Stage Ridge Splitting and Implant Placement in the Upper Jaw
Comparison of Ridge Splitting Techniques Using Piezo Surgery Versus Conventional Bone Discs
for Dental Implants in the Posterior Lower Jaw
Bone Ridge Reconstruction Using Guided Bone Regeneration With Collagen or Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes
Randomized Clinical Trial for Adults Aged 20 to 48
Comparison of microstructures between block grafts from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation of the maxilla: a case series study.
Alberto Monje, Florencio Monje, Hsun-Liang Chan...
Particulate vs. block bone grafts: three-dimensional changes in graft volume after reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla, a 2-year radiographic follow-up.