Self-Perceived Knowledge and Comfort Discussing Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues among Professionals Managing Neuroinflammatory Diseases.
Aliza B Ben-Zacharia, Francois A Bethoux, Angelo Volandes
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33064605Actively Recruiting
Led by Hunter College of City University of New York · Updated on 2026-04-22
50
Participants Needed
2
Research Sites
4 weeks
Total Duration
H
Hunter College of City University of New York
Lead Sponsor
N
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Collaborating Sponsor
Researchers are evaluating the impact of two different palliative care approaches on knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making among adults aged 18 to 65 with neuroinflammatory diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD), or anti-MOG. The study compares a video decision aid model to standard palliative care written information. The aim is to explore patients' preferences for care goals, decisional conflict, knowledge, and preparation for making healthcare decisions, with assessments at baseline and after three months. Participants are randomly assigned to either view a 10-minute palliative care video or receive written informational sheets about palliative care conversations and advance care planning. The video includes empathic messaging, explanations of care goals using the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) framework, and visual aids describing life-prolonging, limited/blended, and comfort care options. Both groups complete demographic forms and pre- and post-tests at baseline and after three months. The video group can review the video as needed using iPads, and an advance care planning facilitator guide supports consistent delivery of the intervention. During the study, participants will report their goals-of-care preferences, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and ventilatory support choices at several timepoints: baseline, immediately after the intervention or control material, and after three months via phone follow-up. Researchers will assess treatment preferences, knowledge about palliative care, decisional conflict, and preparation for decision making. They will also explore changes in preferences and documentation of palliative care conversations over time. The total participant involvement includes initial visits and a three-month follow-up assessment.
CONDITIONS
A Palliative Care Model Impact on Knowledge and Attitudes
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 1 day
Participants provide baseline goals-of-care preferences and other relevant information before receiving the intervention or control materials.
1 baseline visit (in-person)
Duration - Same day as baseline
Participants either watch a palliative care video or review written palliative care materials to support advance care planning discussions.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 3 months after baseline
Participants are contacted by telephone to reassess goals-of-care preferences and discuss any changes after three months.
1 follow-up phone call
Total: 2 locations
1
Judith Jaffe Multiple Sclerosis Center
New York, New York, United States, 10021
Actively Recruiting
2
Hunter College
New York, New York, United States, 10128
Actively Recruiting
A
Aliza Ben-Zacharia, PhD
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Aliza B Ben-Zacharia, Francois A Bethoux, Angelo Volandes
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33064605Aliza Bitton Ben-Zacharia, Helen T Brugger, Stephanie Carbone...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37610856