The state of complex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in the Vascular Quality Initiative.
Thomas F X O'Donnell, Virendra I Patel, Sarah E Deery...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30718110/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of California, Davis · Updated on 2026-05-06
40
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
52 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating a physician modified endograft for treating complex aortic aneurysms, including pararenal, juxtarenal, and thoracoabdominal types, in high-risk patients who lack options for FDA-approved endovascular repair. This study focuses on patients with aneurysms involving visceral vessels such as the renal arteries, superior mesenteric artery, or celiac trunk. The purpose is to assess the safety and effectiveness of this device in a minimally invasive manner for those who cannot undergo traditional open repair. The treatment involves modifying Cook Medical devices, including Zenith TX2 Dissection Endovascular Grafts, Zenith Alpha Thoracic Endovascular Grafts, and Zenith Fenestrated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Grafts. These devices are customized by creating fenestrations or branches to preserve blood flow to vital arteries. A staged approach may be used before device implantation to reduce risk. The modified graft is implanted using imaging guidance, and flow through the branches is ensured with selective angiograms. Participants will be followed for five years after enrollment, with visits at one month, six months, one year, and annually thereafter. Follow-up includes clinical exams, which may be conducted by phone or video, along with CT scans and ultrasounds as needed. Researchers will monitor safety by tracking major adverse events within 30 days or hospitalization and measure treatment success at one year and annually up to five years. Lifelong clinical follow-up will also be conducted to evaluate long-term outcomes.
CONDITIONS
Physician Modified Endograft For Complex Aortic Aneurysm Repair
S
Sina Zarrintan, MD
K
Kathleen Groh
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of California, Davis
Lead Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Physician-Modified Endograft | Company Custom or Off-the-Shelf Endograft |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A standard endograft that is manually altered by the treating physician in the operating room to create tailored fenestrations or branches, enabling endovascular repair of complex abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms not suitable for unmodified devices. | A company-manufactured, custom-designed or off-the-shelf fenestrated or branched endograft engineered specifically to accommodate individual patient anatomy, used to treat complex aortic aneurysms with similar anatomical challenges. |
| Role in trial | Studied as the primary investigational treatment for patients with complex aortic aneurysm who are not candidates for commercially available non-modified endografts. | Serves as the main alternative in routine practice for anatomically challenging aneurysms that cannot be treated with standard devices. |
| Primary use | Allows minimally invasive endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms in patients at high risk for open surgery and not eligible for standard devices. | Indicated for endovascular repair of complex abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, including cases with involvement near visceral arteries. |
| How it is given or performed | The treating physician modifies a standard endograft by creating custom fenestrations or branches to match the patient’s anatomy before endovascular implantation. | The device is provided by the manufacturer either as a custom-made or pre-fabricated graft, based on preoperative imaging, and is implanted via standard endovascular techniques. |
| Evidence status | Supports feasibility in high-risk patients, but larger studies are ongoing to define safety and effectiveness. Early outcomes focus on technical success, perioperative events, and need for reintervention. | Supported by larger observational studies and registries as a technically established approach; outcomes depend on aneurysm complexity and patient risk profile. |
| Important limitations | Limited long-term data and greater technical variability; procedure depends heavily on physician expertise and may present unique challenges, including regulatory hurdles and patient selection. | Timing constraints for custom manufacturing, device cost, regional availability, and anatomical suitability can restrict use. Some patients with urgent need or highly complex anatomy remain ineligible. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Single procedure with possible staged approach 2 to 4 weeks prior to main implantation
Participants undergo a physician-modified endograft procedure to repair complex abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. This involves modification of the endograft device on a sterile table and implantation through a minimally invasive endovascular approach.
1 to 2 procedures (in-person)
Duration - Up to 5 years
Participants are monitored after treatment to assess safety and effectiveness, including evaluations at one month, six months, one year, and yearly thereafter for up to five years.
Visits at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NA
Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
1
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Thomas F X O'Donnell, Virendra I Patel, Sarah E Deery...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30718110/Benjamin W Starnes
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22554425/Salvatore T Scali, Dan Neal, Vida Sollanek...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26254453/Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Franziska Heidemann, Fiona Rohlffs...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28874089/Aminder Singh, Sebastian Mafeld, Robin Williams...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30033825/Sonia Ronchey, Eugenia Serrao, Holta Kasemi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25887934/Matthew P Sweet, Benjamin W Starnes, Billi Tatum
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26194816/Jean Nicolas Sénémaud, Iannis Ben Abdallah, Paul de Boissieu...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31708298/Sukgu M Han, Emanuel R Tenorio, Aleem K Mirza...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205248/Benjamin W Starnes, Rachel E Heneghan, Billi Tatum
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27687323/University of California, Davis
Lead Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
Collaborating Sponsor