Evaluating Remote Early Interventions and Care Models for Adults with Severe Chronic Gastrointestinal Symptoms

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of early remote interventions for patients with severe, chronic, or relapsing gastrointestinal symptoms that lack clear explanation and who are waiting for care in an integrated clinic. The study uses a two-stage randomization to compare different approaches, aiming to improve symptom management, identify which patients respond best to certain treatments, and assess acceptance of new care models. About 200 patients will initially have their symptoms and wheat intolerance assessed remotely. Participants who continue to experience symptoms after initial assessment will be randomly assigned to one of four pre-consultation interventions a standardized dietician-supervised program, an exercise program, internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy, or no intervention. Following this, they will be randomized again to receive either a consultant-led outpatient clinic consultation or care in an integrated clinic, depending on their response to the pre-consultation intervention. Throughout the study, participants will be regularly assessed using a structured gastrointestinal symptoms score and quality of life measures, collected at multiple time points up to 44 weeks. Additional evaluations include anxiety and depression scales, microbiome analysis, and acceptance of care models by patients and staff. Cost-effectiveness will also be tracked. The total participation involves remote interventions, clinical consultations, and multiple assessments over time to monitor symptoms, quality of life, and treatment impact.

A Practice Change for Patients With Severe Chronic, Clinically Unexplained Gastrointestinal Symptoms