Accuracy and Safety Assessment of Pressure Sensing Sheath Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared to Traditional Invasive and Non-invasive Methods in Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Prospective, Single-Center, Self-Controlled Randomized Study
Led by Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital Tongji University · Updated on 2025-12-02
50
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
21 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
Brief Title
Who Can Participate
AI-Screening
Your Study Journey
Trial Site Locations
Research Team
How is the study designed?
Similar Trials
Frequently Asked Questions
Research Publications
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are evaluating the accuracy and safety of a pressure sensing sheath for blood pressure monitoring during neuroendovascular procedures compared to traditional methods such as radial arterial line catheterization and non-invasive cuff monitoring. This study focuses on adult patients undergoing elective transradial interventional procedures requiring continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring. It is a prospective, single-center, self-controlled randomized trial designed to provide high-quality evidence, particularly in a Chinese patient population, to better understand the performance and clinical suitability of this new monitoring technology.
Patients enrolled will have simultaneous blood pressure measurements taken using three methods: the pressure sensing sheath inserted via the radial artery, a traditional radial arterial line placed in the opposite arm, and a standard non-invasive blood pressure cuff. The study randomizes which arm receives each invasive monitoring method and measures blood pressure at specific time points during the procedure lasting approximately 1 to 4 hours. The trial also evaluates procedural efficiency, patient comfort, and the incidence of access site complications, with follow-up visits extending to seven days post-procedure.
Participants will attend four study visits: enrollment, intraoperative monitoring, and follow-ups at 24 hours and seven days after the procedure. During these visits, researchers will collect data on blood pressure readings, procedural timing, complications, patient-reported pain scores, and safety assessments using clinical examinations and ultrasound. Continuous data quality control and equipment calibration ensure accurate measurement. The primary outcome is the agreement of mean arterial pressure measurements between the pressure sensing sheath and radial arterial line during the procedure, with secondary outcomes including safety and patient comfort measures.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
Pressure Sensing Sheath Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared to Traditional Methods in Interventional Procedures
Known severe aortic or subclavian artery stenosis or occlusion
Severe coagulation dysfunction (INR 6ge;2.0, platelet count <75�D710�B9/L)
Body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m�B2
Severe heart failure (NYHA Class IV) or emergency rescue with hemodynamic instability
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
1
2
3
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (enrollment visit)
Treatment
Duration - Approximately 1 to 4 hours (duration of procedure)
Participants undergo elective transradial interventional procedures during which blood pressure is continuously monitored using both the pressure sensing sheath and traditional radial arterial line methods simultaneously.
1 intraoperative visit (in-person)
Post-operative Follow-up
Duration - 7 days post-procedure
Participants are monitored for access site complications and patient-reported puncture site pain after the procedure.
2 visits (24 hours and 7 days post-procedure)
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital Tongji University
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
William J Powers, Alejandro A Rabinstein, Teri Ackerson...