Advanced CT Imaging for the Assessment of Calcific Coronary Artery Disease and PCI Planning.
Atomu Tajima, Frederic Bouisset, Hirofumi Ohashi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39131223/Actively Recruiting
Led by Fundación EPIC · Updated on 2026-08-10
700
Participants Needed
14
Research Sites
2 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are investigating whether a coronary CT angiography CCTA-guided calcium modification approach can improve the treatment of patients with significant calcified coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention PCI. This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial compares the CCTA-guided strategy to the current standard of care using intravascular ultrasound IVUS-guided PCI. The study aims to see if the CT-based approach can improve procedural efficiency and stent results while maintaining similar clinical outcomes to IVUS guidance. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one using CCTA to inform calcium modification and plaque preparation before PCI, and the other using IVUS imaging to guide the procedure. Both groups undergo imaging to evaluate lesion characteristics before the procedure, with IVUS also used after stent placement to confirm correct implantation. The trial includes two main goals showing superiority in minimal stent area by IVUS and demonstrating non-inferiority in 12-month target vessel failure rates. During the study, participants receive imaging and PCI treatments according to their assigned group. Researchers will collect data on procedure time, radiation exposure, contrast volume, and detailed stent measurements. Clinical safety outcomes such as myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis will be monitored up to 12 months, along with patient-reported angina symptoms. Total participant involvement spans the procedure and follow-up assessments to evaluate both imaging and clinical outcomes.
CONDITIONS
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)
C
CAROLINA FOCELLA
C
CARLOS COLLET, MD,PhD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Fundación EPIC
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | CT‑guided calcium modification | IVUS‑guided calcium modification |
|---|---|---|
| What the strategy involves | CT coronary angiography is used to assess lesion characteristics for calcium modification planning prior to stenting. | Intravascular ultrasound is used to assess lesion features and guide calcium modification before stent placement. |
| Role in trial | Investigational arm evaluated for CT‑based lesion assessment and planning. | Active comparator arm using established IVUS imaging guidance. |
| Primary purpose | Calcium modification planning and stent optimization using CT imaging. | Calcium modification planning and stent optimization using intravascular ultrasound. |
| How imaging is performed | Coronary CT angiogram is performed before PCI to evaluate lesion calcium characteristics. | IVUS imaging is used during the procedure to assess lesion and confirm stent implantation. |
| Current evidence and guideline support | Evidence is limited to investigational use in this trial; broader effectiveness is not yet established. | In randomized trials of calcified lesions, intravascular imaging guidance has improved 1‑year outcomes over angiography‑only guidance. |
| Important risks | Not yet characterized; safety profile is under evaluation in the trial. | Imaging guidance may increase procedural complexity and imaging‑related risks, but IVUS is generally well established. |
| Important limitations | Applicability depends on CT image quality and availability; its benefit over IVUS is unproven. | Requires intravascular catheterization and adds procedure time and cost compared with angiography alone. |
| Patient‑relevant impact | Not yet established; outcomes will depend on trial results. | Guidance by intravascular imaging is associated with better clinical outcomes at one year in randomized PCI trials of calcified lesions. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - Up to 12 months for follow-up
Participants undergo percutaneous coronary intervention guided either by coronary CT angiography or intravascular ultrasound to modify calcium and place stents.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Atomu Tajima, Frederic Bouisset, Hirofumi Ohashi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39131223/Carlos Collet, Damien Collison, Takuya Mizukami...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36543445/Carlos Collet, Jeroen Sonck, Bert Vandeloo...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31582137/Jeroen Sonck, Sakura Nagumo, Bjarne L Norgaard...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35798401/G Monizzi, J Sonck, S Nagumo...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33205340/Fundación EPIC
Lead Sponsor