Treatment for Word Retrieval in Semantic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia: Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes.
Maya L Henry, H Isabel Hubbard, Stephanie M Grasso...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31390290/Actively Recruiting
Led by Maya Henry · Updated on 2026-06-29
80
Participants Needed
2
Research Sites
13 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are investigating whether combining home-based brain stimulation with virtual speech-language therapy can improve communication in adults with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia lvPPA, a language disorder often caused by Alzheimers disease. The study aims to understand if this combined approach is feasible and acceptable, if it improves communication compared to speech therapy with placebo stimulation, and whether individual brain characteristics predict treatment benefits. Participants will receive either active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS remotely supervised at home alongside virtual language therapy sessions. The active tDCS delivers 2.0 milliamp current for 20 minutes, 5 times per week, while participants engage in computer-delivered speech training. Language therapy consists of two one-hour teletherapy sessions per week plus independent practice exercises three times weekly. The study compares active stimulation with sham placebo stimulation to evaluate the added effect of brain stimulation. During the study, participants complete language and cognitive tests before and after treatment. They also undergo brain imaging and other assessments to help understand treatment response. Researchers measure changes in spoken naming ability at one and three months after treatment starts, along with communication confidence and aphasia impact. Treatment acceptability and perception of change are also evaluated. Participation lasts through the treatment and follow-up periods, with ongoing monitoring of outcomes.
CONDITIONS
Remotely-supervised Neuromodulation in PPA
A
Aphasia Lab Research Coordinator
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Maya Henry
Lead Sponsor
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Language therapy plus active tDCS | Language therapy plus sham tDCS | Standard speech‑language therapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Language therapy paired with remotely supervised active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home | Language therapy paired with remotely supervised sham (inactive) tDCS at home | Speech‑language therapy focused on communication strategies is the common care approach for people with PPA |
| Role in trial | Assigned investigational arm delivering language therapy with active stimulation | Assigned control arm delivering language therapy with sham (placebo) stimulation | Represents the usual speech‑language therapy patients receive outside the study |
| Primary use | To improve word retrieval and communication when paired with language therapy | To serve as a placebo control for comparison with active stimulation | Maintain communication through structured speech‑language therapy |
| How it is given or performed | Teletherapy sessions twice weekly plus independent practice, with home‑based supervised active tDCS (20 minutes, 5 times weekly) during therapy | Same language therapy schedule with home‑based sham tDCS (brief current then off) supervised remotely, 20 minutes, 5 times weekly | Typically delivered in-person or via telepractice by speech‑language therapists, using strategies to support communication |
| Evidence status | Efficacy under investigation; tDCS plus language therapy shows promise in improving word retrieval in PPA in small studies and meta‑analysis | Used to control for placebo effects; efficacy data derived from comparison to active tDCS within trial | Speech‑language therapy supports maintenance of communication function in PPA although it does not alter disease progression |
| Important risks | Potential home‑based tDCS risks such as mild skin irritation or discomfort, with remote supervision intended to enhance safety | Sham stimulation expected to carry minimal physical risk | Generally low risk; benefits related to communication support without known intervention‑related risks |
| Important limitations | tDCS effects may vary by stimulation protocol, patient characteristics, and study heterogeneity; long‑term benefits are uncertain | Sham condition does not provide therapeutic stimulation; comparison may not reflect real‑world absence of tDCS | Therapy does not stop disease progression and access may vary; not uniformly effective for all individuals |
| Patient impact | Potential improvement in word retrieval immediately and up to three months after treatment | Designed to assess baseline effect of language therapy without active stimulation | Helps maintain communication skills and daily interaction despite progressive language decline |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - 5 weeks
Participants receive virtual language therapy with either active or sham remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation at home. Therapy includes teletherapy sessions and independent practice exercises.
Five sessions per week
Duration - 3 months
Participants complete language and cognitive testing and questionnaires to evaluate treatment effects at one and three months after treatment.
Two follow-up visits
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
TRIPLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Maya L Henry, H Isabel Hubbard, Stephanie M Grasso...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31390290/Heather R Dial, Holly A Hinshelwood, Stephanie M Grasso...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30880927/Maya Henry
Lead Sponsor
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Collaborating Sponsor