What this Trial Is About

Hospitalisation in intensive care is always traumatic and can lead to a long rehabilitation process, slowed down by symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These psychiatric disorders, or post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), can persist for several years after hospitalisation in intensive care and cause functional disability. They are associated with the use of psychotropic drugs and mental health services, and impair health-related quality of life. This research is based on the hypothesis that the traumatic nature of intensive care hospitalisation can be reduced by implementing programmes to improve intensive care hospitalisation conditions, promoting changes in the practices of all healthcare professionals involved in intensive care. IPREA3 study (Kalfon et al, 2017) demonstrated that implementation of a tailor-made, multi-component programme, led by a doctor/non-medical caregiver significantly reduced the overall discomfort score (derived from the IPREA questionnaire) perceived by patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit with sufficient experience in applying this programme, having used it for at least 5 months (Kalfon et al, 2017) . The originality and interest of this research, in comparison with the IPREA3 study, lie in the following aspects: * the use of the most recent version of the IPREA questionnaire, * the questionnaire was completed by the patient themselves without the intervention of a caregiver (self-administration) * the fact that new care practices, aimed at humanising a stay in intensive care and making the experience of a stay in intensive care less traumatic, were described after the publication of the IPREA3 study a * a longer programme learning period of 9 months (compared to 5 months during the IPREA3 study) * the launch of the PREMREA programme with a conference led by a patient expert

Reported Experience Measurement on Reducing Patient Discomfort in Intensive Care