Actively Recruiting
Restrictive Versus Liberal Thresholds for RBC Transfusion in ECMO
Led by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Updated on 2025-04-08
526
Participants Needed
12
Research Sites
252 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
Sponsors
A
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead Sponsor
Z
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Collaborating Sponsor
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Rationale: In patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is very common. This is possibly due to the application of liberal thresholds and the lack of evidence-based guidelines. Although RBC transfusion can be lifesaving, it is also a risk-bearing intervention with substantial risk for morbidity and mortality in this critically ill population. Also, with increasing scarcity, RBC transfusions are becoming more expensive. Furthermore, in the past decades it has been shown in several critically ill patient populations - not on ECMO - that maintaining a restrictive hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for RBC transfusion is non-inferior, including in cardiothoracic surgery, acute myocardial infarction and septic shock. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a restrictive transfusion threshold for RBC is safe to apply in patients on ECMO in comparison with a liberal transfusion threshold. Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to study in a prospective randomized comparison whether a restrictive RBC transfusions strategy is non-inferior compared to a liberal strategy in patients on ECMO with respect to 90-day mortality. Study design: Prospective multi-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Study population: Patients, 18 years or older, receiving ECMO. Intervention: Restrictive RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 7.0 g/dL (4.3 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. The aimed Hb target range of the restrictive/intervention group will be 7.1 - 9.0 g/dL (4.3 - 5.6 mmol/L). Liberal RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 9.0 g/dL (5.6 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. Target range of the liberal group is defined as Hb 9.1 - 11.0 g/dL Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter is 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: 1) proportion of patients on ECMO exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion; 2) RBC volume infused per patient during ECMO; 3) reasons for RBC transfusion other than Hb triggers; 4) transfusion reactions; 5) time on ECMO; 6) length of hospital- and ICU-stay; 7) in-ICU morbidity; 8) quality of life (QoL), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 9) costs related to a) transfusion, b) hospital admission and c) transfusion-related sequelae.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Restrictive Versus Liberal Thresholds for RBC Transfusion in ECMO
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Patient is aged 18 years or older
- Is receiving ECMO
- (Deferred) informed consent
You will not qualify if you...
- Not expected to survive for 24 hours when assessed
- Inability to receive blood products
- (Known) decline to blood transfusions (e.g., Jehovah's Witnesses)
- Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) using low blood flow or pumpless devices (e.g., MINILUNG �ae, PrismaLung+)
- Received ECMO over 48 hours before screening for eligibility
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 12 locations
1
Hôpital Erasme Brussels
Brussels, Brussels Capital, Belgium, 1070
Actively Recruiting
2
KU Leuven, medical IC
Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium, 3000
Actively Recruiting
3
KU Leuven, surgical IC
Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium, 3000
Actively Recruiting
4
CHU Charleroi
Charleroi, Hainaut, Belgium, 6000
Actively Recruiting
5
Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST)
Enschede, Drenthe, Netherlands, 7512 KZ
Actively Recruiting
6
Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+ (MUMC+)
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229 HX
Actively Recruiting
7
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
Actively Recruiting
8
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen (UMCG)
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
Actively Recruiting
9
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
Not Yet Recruiting
10
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands, 3015 GD
Not Yet Recruiting
11
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3435 CM
Actively Recruiting
12
Karolinska Universtiy Hospital
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden, 171 76
Not Yet Recruiting
Research Team
A
Alexander P.J. Vlaar, PhD
CONTACT
S
Stefan F. van Wonderen, MD
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
PREVENTION
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here