Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years +
All Genders
NCT06560164

Restrictive Versus Liberal Thresholds for RBC Transfusion in ECMO

Led by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Updated on 2025-04-08

526

Participants Needed

12

Research Sites

252 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

Sponsors

A

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Lead Sponsor

Z

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

Collaborating Sponsor

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Rationale: In patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is very common. This is possibly due to the application of liberal thresholds and the lack of evidence-based guidelines. Although RBC transfusion can be lifesaving, it is also a risk-bearing intervention with substantial risk for morbidity and mortality in this critically ill population. Also, with increasing scarcity, RBC transfusions are becoming more expensive. Furthermore, in the past decades it has been shown in several critically ill patient populations - not on ECMO - that maintaining a restrictive hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for RBC transfusion is non-inferior, including in cardiothoracic surgery, acute myocardial infarction and septic shock. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a restrictive transfusion threshold for RBC is safe to apply in patients on ECMO in comparison with a liberal transfusion threshold. Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to study in a prospective randomized comparison whether a restrictive RBC transfusions strategy is non-inferior compared to a liberal strategy in patients on ECMO with respect to 90-day mortality. Study design: Prospective multi-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Study population: Patients, 18 years or older, receiving ECMO. Intervention: Restrictive RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 7.0 g/dL (4.3 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. The aimed Hb target range of the restrictive/intervention group will be 7.1 - 9.0 g/dL (4.3 - 5.6 mmol/L). Liberal RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 9.0 g/dL (5.6 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. Target range of the liberal group is defined as Hb 9.1 - 11.0 g/dL Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter is 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: 1) proportion of patients on ECMO exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion; 2) RBC volume infused per patient during ECMO; 3) reasons for RBC transfusion other than Hb triggers; 4) transfusion reactions; 5) time on ECMO; 6) length of hospital- and ICU-stay; 7) in-ICU morbidity; 8) quality of life (QoL), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 9) costs related to a) transfusion, b) hospital admission and c) transfusion-related sequelae.

CONDITIONS

Official Title

Restrictive Versus Liberal Thresholds for RBC Transfusion in ECMO

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years +
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Patient is aged 18 years or older
  • Is receiving ECMO
  • (Deferred) informed consent
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Not expected to survive for 24 hours when assessed
  • Inability to receive blood products
  • (Known) decline to blood transfusions (e.g., Jehovah's Witnesses)
  • Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) using low blood flow or pumpless devices (e.g., MINILUNG �ae, PrismaLung+)
  • Received ECMO over 48 hours before screening for eligibility

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Trial Site Locations

Total: 12 locations

1

Hôpital Erasme Brussels

Brussels, Brussels Capital, Belgium, 1070

Actively Recruiting

2

KU Leuven, medical IC

Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium, 3000

Actively Recruiting

3

KU Leuven, surgical IC

Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium, 3000

Actively Recruiting

4

CHU Charleroi

Charleroi, Hainaut, Belgium, 6000

Actively Recruiting

5

Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST)

Enschede, Drenthe, Netherlands, 7512 KZ

Actively Recruiting

6

Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+ (MUMC+)

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229 HX

Actively Recruiting

7

Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands, 1105 AZ

Actively Recruiting

8

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen (UMCG)

Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ

Actively Recruiting

9

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)

Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA

Not Yet Recruiting

10

Erasmus MC

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands, 3015 GD

Not Yet Recruiting

11

St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3435 CM

Actively Recruiting

12

Karolinska Universtiy Hospital

Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden, 171 76

Not Yet Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

A

Alexander P.J. Vlaar, PhD

CONTACT

S

Stefan F. van Wonderen, MD

CONTACT

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

NONE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

PREVENTION

Number of Arms

2

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here