Actively Recruiting
Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety
Led by Sohag University · Updated on 2026-02-23
32
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
56 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by: * Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Adults: Both male and female participants
- Diagnosed with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with significant occlusions in the femoropopliteal artery
- Rutherford Class 5: Non-healing wounds or ulcers
- Failed or unable to achieve antegrade access and requiring retrograde puncture
- Planned intervention with retrograde access for endovascular treatments including angioplasty and stent deployment
You will not qualify if you...
- Active infection at the puncture site, especially over the ankle region
- Severe arterial calcification or anatomical abnormalities preventing safe retrograde puncture
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Sohag University Hospital
Sohag, Egypt, 82511
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
Y
Yohana F Fayez, MBBCh
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here