Spinal cord stimulation in non-reconstructable critical limb ischemia: a retrospective study of 71 cases.
G S Piedade, J Vesper, D Reichstein...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36598544/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of Nebraska · Updated on 2025-10-22
15
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
25 weeks
Total Duration
Peripheral arterial disease PAD affects over 230 million adults worldwide and causes serious disability and high medical costs. The main symptom driving disability is ischemic leg pain, which results from poor oxygen supply, nerve problems, and muscle damage. This pain limits exercise, a key treatment for PAD. Spinal cord stimulation SCS is a known therapy for difficult-to-treat pain like painful diabetic neuropathy PDN and ischemic pain, but it is not yet standard care for PAD. Newer high-frequency SCS has shown promise for pain relief but has not been tested for PAD-related leg pain before. This study will include up to 15 adults aged 19 to 89 with PAD and PDN who have a permanent spinal cord stimulator implanted. After 12 weeks of implantation and optimizing the device, participants will undergo two weeks of active high-frequency SCS and two weeks of sham stimulation without pain relief, in random order. Blood flow, blood pressure, skin oxygen, and pain levels in the legs will be measured before implantation, after 12 weeks, and during each treatment period. Quality of life surveys will also be completed during these times. Participants will start with an evaluation visit, followed by the 12-week post-implantation check. Then, they will be randomly assigned to receive either active or sham stimulation for two weeks, switching treatments after that period. After the 4-week intervention, participants will return to usual SCS care. Researchers will compare pain, blood flow, autonomic control, and quality of life data from before and after treatment to understand the effects of high-frequency SCS on PAD and PDN symptoms.
CONDITIONS
SCS for Patient With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy and Peripheral Arterial Disease
J
Julia T Hoffman, MSN
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of Nebraska
Lead Sponsor
Nevro Corp
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Active SCS Device | Sham Device Condition |
|---|---|---|
| What is it? | Active spinal cord stimulation uses an implanted device to deliver electrical signals to the spinal cord in order to reduce chronic pain and improve symptoms for people with neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease. | Sham stimulation involves placement of a comparable device but without active electrical signals, serving as a placebocontrol to distinguish the true effect of SCS from device expectation. |
| Role in Trial | This intervention is being tested for its potential to relieve pain, improve blood flow, and enhance quality of life in eligible patients. | Acts as the comparator within the crossover trial to measure the effectiveness of active SCS against placebo. |
| Primary Use | SCS is intended to decrease pain and address symptoms caused by diabetic neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease. | The sham device condition is used to allow for controlled evaluation of pain, blood flow, and symptom changes without active stimulation. |
| How is it given or performed? | A permanent spinal cord stimulator is surgically implanted after a successful temporary trial, and programmed to deliver electrical signals targeting pain and vascular symptoms. | A device is also placed, but it does not deliver active stimulation. Participants and investigators are masked to the condition during the crossover periods. |
| Evidence Status | Active SCS has published evidence for pain relief and improvement in quality of life for diabetic neuropathy and chronic limb ischemia, though patient selection and technique influence outcomes. | Sham stimulation has not demonstrated a significant long-term effect on pain or vascular symptoms; it serves as a control for short-term placebo response. |
| Important Limitations | The effectiveness of SCS can vary depending on individual patient characteristics, disease severity, and technical placement. Risks and benefits may differ compared to routine care, and long-term outcomes are still under study. | Sham stimulation does not offer clinical symptom relief and cannot be used as a therapeutic option outside a research setting. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 12 weeks
Participants undergo permanent spinal cord stimulator implantation and optimization as part of the study intervention.
1 baseline visit and 1 follow-up visit
Duration - 4 weeks
Participants receive active or sham spinal cord stimulation in a randomized, blinded, crossover design to assess pain relief and other outcomes.
2 treatment periods of 2 weeks each
Duration - Ongoing after treatment
After the treatment periods, participants return to standard spinal cord stimulator care and are observed for ongoing outcomes.
Visits as part of routine care
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
DOUBLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
CROSSOVER
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
G S Piedade, J Vesper, D Reichstein...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36598544/J Broseta, J Barberá, J A de Vera...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3484519/Erika A Petersen, Thomas G Stauss, James A Scowcroft...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33818600/Adnan Al-Kaisy, Stefano Palmisani, David Pang...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29608229/Martin Kilchukov, Roman Kiselev, Anton Gorbatykh...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36617410/Alessandra Tedesco, Massimo D'Addato
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22151190/J B Myklebust, J F Cusick, L E Boerboom...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8751312/B Cucuruz, R Kopp, H Hampe-Hecht...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35466931/Milind Deogaonkar, Zion Zibly, Konstantin V Slavin
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24262897/S Vincenzo, T Kyventidis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17691384/University of Nebraska
Lead Sponsor
Nevro Corp
Collaborating Sponsor