Digital Contact Tracing Based on a Graph Database Algorithm for Emergency Management During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Case Study.
Zijun Mao, Hong Yao, Qi Zou...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33460389/Actively Recruiting
Led by Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center · Updated on 2025-09-16
95
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
4 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating two fertilization methodsintracytoplasmic sperm injection ICSI and conventional in vitro fertilization IVFto determine which leads to better embryo development using frozen donor sperm in people without male fertility issues. This randomized, sibling-oocyte controlled trial aims to find out whether one method creates more usable embryos, affects fertilization success, or improves embryo quality and early pregnancy rates. The study focuses on non-male factor infertility cycles and addresses the clinical debate about routine ICSI use in these cases. Participants will have their mature eggs divided into two groups one fertilized by ICSI, where a single sperm is directly injected into each egg, and the other by conventional IVF, where eggs are mixed with frozen-thawed donor sperm in culture for 16-18 hours. The assignment of eggs to each method is randomized within each participant. Embryos from both methods will be cultured under identical lab conditions and assessed for fertilization, blastulation, embryo quality, and early pregnancy outcomes. During the study, participants will continue their regular fertility treatment. Researchers will monitor outcomes such as the blastulation rate, fertilization rate, incidence of total fertilization failure, proportion of high-quality blastocysts, and early clinical pregnancy rate confirmed by ultrasound. The study will use statistical methods to compare results within each participant. Data confidentiality and regulatory standards will be maintained throughout the study, which is expected to enroll about 178 participants over 12 months.
CONDITIONS
SISTER: Sibling Oocyte Insemination With Frozen Sperm From Third Party Donors: Evaluation of Reproductive Techniques
A
Allison Eubanks, MD
T
Tasha Newsome
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | ICSI (within trial) | Conventional insemination (within trial) | Standard conventional insemination outside trial |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of mature oocytes with a single thawed donor sperm cell per oocyte under microscope within each participant’s cycle | Conventional insemination by co‑incubating oocytes with thawed donor sperm in dish for 16–18 hours within same participant’s cycle | Conventional insemination using frozen donor sperm in routine IVF cycles in broader practice |
| Role in trial | One condition randomly assigned to sibling oocytes for crossover comparison | Paired condition randomly assigned to sibling oocytes to compare with ICSI | Routine insemination method used in donor sperm IVF outside this trial |
| Primary use | Fertilization of oocytes using donor sperm cell injection | Fertilization of oocytes by co‑incubation with donor sperm | Fertilization of oocytes by standard co‑incubation with donor sperm in clinical practice |
| How it is performed | Each oocyte is injected with one thawed donor sperm under micromanipulator on microscope | Oocytes are placed in a culture dish with prepared donor sperm and incubated for about 16 to 18 hours | Fertilization is achieved by incubating donor sperm with oocytes in a dish under lab protocols |
| Evidence status | Effectiveness for blastulation and live birth not yet established within trial | Effectiveness for blastulation and live birth not yet established within trial | In donor‑sperm IVF cycles, conventional insemination showed higher fertilization, blastulation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared to ICSI |
| Important limitations | Trial results not yet available | Outcomes not yet known within this trial context | Observational cohort data may reflect clinic variation and not randomised comparison |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Approximately 1 week from oocyte retrieval through embryo culture
Participants undergo transvaginal oocyte retrieval and their mature oocytes are randomly assigned to two fertilization methods: intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) using frozen donor sperm. Embryos are cultured and assessed for fertilization, development, and quality.
1 baseline visit for oocyte retrieval and fertilization procedures, followed by laboratory assessments
Duration - Approximately 5 to 7 weeks
Participants are monitored for early clinical pregnancy outcomes approximately 5 to 7 weeks after embryo transfer with ultrasound confirmation.
1 to 2 visits for pregnancy outcome assessment
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
CROSSOVER
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Zijun Mao, Hong Yao, Qi Zou...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33460389/Daniel Y Mo, Yuk Ming Tang, Edmund Y Wu...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35676938/Mihaela Teodorescu, Jodi H Barnet, Erika W Hagen...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25585327/R P Romero-Galisteo, E Pinero-Pinto, R Palomo-Carrión...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37788534/Guiliang Hao, Xiaoxia Zhou, Hao Yan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36932033/G Palermo, H Joris, P Devroey...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1351601/Rongjun Zhang, Shuxiang Xu, Miaomiao Yuan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37462439/Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center
Lead Sponsor