Comparing Video and Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubating Newborn Babies A Randomized Study to Improve First-Attempt Success and Safety

What this Trial Is About

Many newborn babies experience breathing difficulties that require intubation, a procedure where a tube is inserted into the windpipe to help with breathing support. This trial compares two methods used by doctors to perform intubation the traditional direct laryngoscopy DL, where doctors look directly into the babys mouth with a standard laryngoscope, and video laryngoscopy VL, which uses a camera and screen to view the windpipe. The study aims to determine if VL leads to more successful first attempts without causing drops in oxygen levels or heart rate compared to DL. The trial uses a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design across multiple hospitals. Initially, each hospital uses the standard DL method for intubation. At randomly assigned intervals, hospitals switch to using the VL device, the C-MAC video laryngoscope, which includes a monitor and special blades. Doctors receive training and practice with this device before switching. Other intubation practices, such as drug use and supplemental oxygen, remain the same throughout the study. Participants in the trial are newborn infants undergoing intubation. Researchers will collect information about intubation attempts, including success rates, oxygen levels, heart rates, and any complications like oral trauma or need for chest compressions. The main outcome is whether babies are successfully intubated on the first try without physiological instability within five minutes. Additional measures include procedure time, number of attempts, and adverse events. Data will be compared between the periods using DL and VL to assess effectiveness and safety over the course of the study, which lasts until August 2026.

A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial Of Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy For Intubation Of Newborn Infants