Study evaluating dexmedetomidine in the acute treatment of electrical storm (SEDATE): Rationale and design.
Pouya Motazedian, Pietro Di Santo, Graeme Prosperi-Porta...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41592634/Actively Recruiting
Led by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation · Updated on 2026-07-07
192
Participants Needed
2
Research Sites
12 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are investigating the potential benefit of using the sedative medication dexmedetomidine in the acute treatment of patients experiencing electrical storm, a life-threatening condition characterized by recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. This multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial aims to evaluate whether early sedation with dexmedetomidine can improve outcomes for these patients in intensive care units. Electrical storm involves autonomic dysfunction and high sympathetic tone, which may worsen arrhythmias, and current treatments include anti-arrhythmic drugs and sedatives. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine or a placebo normal saline as part of their initial intensive care treatment. Those receiving dexmedetomidine will start at 0.3 mcgkghr and be titrated up to 1.0 mcgkghr or the maximum tolerated dose. Treatment will continue for approximately 48 hours, followed by a weaning phase, both guided by the treating physician. The placebo group will follow a similar dosing and weaning schedule using saline. During the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes including in-hospital death and ventricular arrhythmias requiring treatment after starting the study drug. The primary outcome combines these events during the hospital stay, which typically lasts about two weeks. Secondary outcomes include cardiac arrest, renal failure, intubation, length of ICU and hospital stay, and need for mechanical support. Safety and effectiveness will be assessed through regular evaluations during the hospitalization period.
CONDITIONS
Study Evaluating Dexmedetomidine in the Acute Treatment of Electrical Storm
F
F. Daniel Ramirez, MD MSc
B
Benjamin Hibbert, MD PhD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Dexmedetomidine sedation (48‑72 hr infusion) | Placebo infusion (normal saline) | Standard stepped‑care ES management |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | An investigational infusion of dexmedetomidine given for 48‑72 hours early during ICU management of electrical storm | A matching placebo infusion of normal saline programmed in the pump to mimic dexmedetomidine | Stepped‑care ICU treatment combining antiarrhythmics, beta‑blockade, sedation, and catheter ablation as needed |
| Role in trial | Tested as an early sedative strategy to reduce arrhythmia recurrence and in‑hospital death | Used as a blinded control to compare against the investigational sedative | Represents usual ICU therapeutic steps outside the trial which may guide treatment decisions |
| Primary use | Sedative therapy aiming to suppress ventricular arrhythmias by reducing sympathetic tone | Serves as inactive infusion control for comparison | Acute management including antiarrhythmic drugs, sedation, beta‑blockers, and catheter ablation when rescue therapy is needed |
| How it is given or performed | Intravenous infusion titrated to a maintenance rate for 48‑72 hours, then weaned | Intravenous normal saline programmed identically to mimic dexmedetomidine infusion | Administered per ICU protocols; may include IV antiarrhythmics, beta‑blockers, procedural sedation, and catheter ablation |
| Evidence status | Under investigation via this randomized controlled trial; efficacy not yet established | Control comparator; efficacy not applicable | Supported by expert consensus and reviews but lacks high‑quality randomized evidence in ES context |
| Important risks | Known sedative risks such as bradycardia or hypotension under ICU monitoring | Minimal risk related to infusion procedures; no active drug | Risks from antiarrhythmics, sedation, procedures, and ablation depending on interventions used |
| Important limitations | Trial results pending; uncertainty whether early sedation improves outcomes | Only serves internal comparator; does not reflect current standard therapy effectiveness | Based on expert opinion and observational data; lacks RCT-level validation and clarity on optimal sequence |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - Approximately 3 days
Participants receive either dexmedetomidine or placebo infusions titrated to the maximum tolerated dose and continued for about 48 hours, followed by a weaning phase guided by the treating physician.
Continuous monitoring in intensive care unit
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
TRIPLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Pouya Motazedian, Pietro Di Santo, Graeme Prosperi-Porta...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41592634/Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Lead Sponsor