Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.
Megan L Kavanaugh, Lori Frohwirth, Jenna Jerman...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23287602/Actively Recruiting
Led by Tufts Medical Center · Updated on 2025-06-04
40
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating the use of a Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation TENS unit to help manage pain during intrauterine device IUD insertion. This prospective cohort study compares patients who choose to use the TENS device during the procedure with those who decline it, aiming to understand its effect on pain relief and patient preference for analgesia methods. The study is led by Tufts Medical Center and includes female participants aged 12 to 50 years who desire IUD insertion and are able to give consent or assent. Participants can decide whether to use the TENS unit during their IUD insertion appointment. The procedure follows standard clinical care, including optional pain management such as NSAIDs, paracervical blocks, or heating pads. The study collects pain scores at several points during the insertion process, including anticipated pain, baseline pain, speculum insertion, tenaculum placement, paracervical block administration if used, cervical dilation if performed, uterine sounding, IUD insertion, and five minutes after insertion. The procedure duration is timed, and additional data are gathered during the visit. During the study visit, participants complete a background questionnaire before the IUD insertion and a post-insertion survey afterward. A urine pregnancy test is done as part of standard care to confirm a negative result before insertion. Researchers monitor pain intensity as the primary outcome and also record vasovagal responses and participants likelihood to recommend their pain management method. Participation lasts through the single study visit, with no extended follow-up periods.
CONDITIONS
TENS Unit for Analgesia During IUD Insertion
C
Caitie McCarthy, MD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Tufts Medical Center
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | TENS device | Standard care | Current practice analgesia |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Use of a small battery‑powered TENS device delivering mild electrical stimulation via skin pads during IUD insertion | Provision of paracervical block or the option to decline analgesia during IUD insertion | Local anesthetic methods like paracervical or topical lidocaine blocks are routinely offered for IUD insertion |
| Role in trial | Investigational device being evaluated for pain relief during insertion | Comparator representing usual analgesia practice in the trial | Reflects common clinical practice for pain control in IUD insertions |
| Primary use | Pain control device used during IUD insertion | Standard analgesia approach during IUD insertion (block or none) | Established method to manage procedural pain during IUD insertion |
| How it is given or performed | Pads applied to skin and connected to a small device delivering electrical pulses during the procedure | Paracervical block injection or no analgesia offered per participant choice | Injection or topical application of lidocaine‑based anesthetic near cervix before IUD insertion |
| Evidence status | Efficacy being evaluated; results not yet available | Common practice but evidence on how well it relieves pain varies | Suggests effectiveness for procedural pain control based on guideline consensus |
| Important risks | Device use is low‑risk; safety not yet established in this procedure | Paracervical block may carry injection‑related risks such as bleeding or discomfort | Established method with known low procedural risk profile |
| Important limitations | Efficacy and patient benefit are not established; device requires application time and may not suit everyone | Some individuals may decline analgesia or find block uncomfortable or unacceptable | Effectiveness may vary; some patients report discomfort or limited pain relief |
| Patient impact | Not yet known whether pain scores or satisfaction improve | May reduce pain for some but inconsistent benefit across patients | Likely improves comfort compared to no analgesia, based on guideline consensus |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Day 1
Participants receive either a TENS unit or standard care during their IUD insertion procedure to manage pain.
1 procedure visit (in-person)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
OTHER
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Megan L Kavanaugh, Lori Frohwirth, Jenna Jerman...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23287602/J M Rignon-Bret, M Pompignoli
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3327829/American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic Practice, Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Expert Work Group
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27548557/Sheila K Mody, Jessica Kiley, Alfred Rademaker...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22770792/Juan F Lisón, Juan J Amer-Cuenca, Silvia Piquer-Martí...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28079781/Julia Potter, Susan E Rubin, Peter Sherman
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24560479/Dana G Callahan, Laura F Garabedian, Kathleen F Harney...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31401254/Kendra L Fleming, Abby Sokoloff, Tina R Raine
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20654760/Claire Asker, Helen Stokes-Lampard, Jackie Beavan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16824298/Tufts Medical Center
Lead Sponsor