Early-Onset Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Presents With Advanced-Stage Disease But Has Improved Survival Compared With Older Individuals.
Jennifer M Kolb, Samuel Han, Frank I Scott...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32777286/Actively Recruiting
Led by Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc · Updated on 2026-06-25
100
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
26 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are studying the use of the EvoEndo Endoscopy system, an ultra-slim, single-use endoscope designed for transnasal endoscopy, to evaluate and provide care for upper gastrointestinal tract diseases in adults undergoing bariatric treatment. This study aims to improve safety, reduce costs, and increase access to endoscopic care compared to traditional methods, particularly for those with obesity and related gastrointestinal conditions. The study focuses on the potential benefits of sedation-free transnasal endoscopy in the bariatric population, addressing challenges of current sedated oral endoscopy methods that can delay diagnosis and increase morbidity and costs. The trial compares two methods sedation-free transnasal endoscopy through the nose using the EvoEndo system and standard sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy EGD through the mouth. Participants receive either an unsedated endoscopic evaluation via the transnasal endoscope or a sedated endoscopic evaluation with a standard upper endoscope. These procedures are conducted in an ambulatory bariatric clinic setting to assess the impact on diagnosis speed, intervention timing, patient and clinic costs, and provider experience. Participants undergo endoscopic assessments and are monitored for outcomes such as patient interest, satisfaction, procedure duration, time to diagnosis, biopsy sample adequacy, cost comparison, and adverse events. Surveys are completed up to seven days after the procedure, with follow-up evaluations extending up to 30 days. The study collects detailed data to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the transnasal endoscopy system while tracking patient and clinic experiences during the trial period, which lasts until mid-2028.
CONDITIONS
Trans-nasal Endoscopy for Bariatric Patients
M
Michele B Ryan, MS
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
Lead Sponsor
EvoEndo, Inc.
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Transnasal Endoscopy (TNE) | Sedated EGD (Standard) |
|---|---|---|
| What is it? | A diagnostic endoscopy procedure where a thin endoscope is passed through the nose without sedation to examine the esophagus, stomach, and upper small intestine. | A standard endoscopic procedure where a flexible upper GI endoscope is passed through the mouth under sedation to examine the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. |
| Role in the trial | Test approach being studied as a less invasive, non-sedated alternative to standard EGD for evaluation in bariatric/obese patients. | Serves as the direct comparator arm, representing established sedated upper GI endoscopy for these patients. |
| Primary use | Evaluation and diagnosis of upper GI tract pathology (such as esophageal or gastric abnormalities) in patients with obesity or GI disorders, without sedation. | Diagnosis and assessment of upper gastrointestinal tract conditions using a sedated endoscopic approach. |
| How is it performed? | A thin, flexible endoscope is inserted through the nostril, usually with topical anesthesia, in a sitting position. No sedation is given and patients remain alert throughout. | A standard upper endoscope is inserted through the mouth while the patient is sedated, generally in a lying position. Sedation is typically administered by an anesthesiologist or trained provider. |
| Evidence status | Multiple prospective studies and reviews support TNE as accurate, feasible, and well-tolerated compared with sedated EGD in adults and children for upper GI evaluation, although experience may vary by local expertise. | Long-established as the gold standard for upper GI evaluation, with extensive evidence supporting diagnostic accuracy and safety in diverse populations, including bariatric patients. |
| Important risks | Risks may include nasal discomfort, mild nosebleeds, or rare adverse events, but serious complications are uncommon. No sedation risks. | Risks include sore throat, bleeding, perforation, aspiration (rare), and sedation-related complications, which are especially relevant in bariatric/obese patients. |
| Important limitations | Not all centers have expertise or equipment for TNE; smaller endoscope size may limit interventional capabilities or biopsy channel size; minor nasal discomfort may affect some patients. | Requires sedation; longer recovery and possible sedation risks; not suitable for all patients due to anesthesia-related concerns; access may be limited by scheduling or anesthesia availability. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - Up to 30 days
Participants receive either sedation-free transnasal endoscopy through the nose or sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy through the mouth to evaluate upper gastrointestinal tract diseases.
1 procedure visit and follow-up assessments
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Jennifer M Kolb, Samuel Han, Frank I Scott...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32777286/J Dumortier, T Ponchon, J Y Scoazec...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10049409/Chi-Tan Hu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19748613/Joel H Rubenstein, Nicholas J Shaheen
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25957861/Sjaak Pouwels, Marc P Buise, Pawel Twardowski...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31127496/Julianna G Gardner, Lauren D Feld
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37180362/Andres Acosta, Sarah Streett, Mathew D Kroh...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28242319/Aaron P Thrift
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29671158/Evan S Dellon, Nirmala Gonsalves, Ikuo Hirano...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23567357/Nathalie Nguyen, Jacob Mark, Glenn T Furuta
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34921762/Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
Lead Sponsor
EvoEndo, Inc.
Collaborating Sponsor