Natural history of intracranial vascular malformations: a review.
R H Wilkins
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3885072/Actively Recruiting
Led by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Updated on 2024-08-15
1000
Participants Needed
30
Research Sites
52 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are studying the best ways to manage patients with brain arteriovenous malformations AVMs, whether these AVMs have caused bleeding ruptured or not unruptured. The study aims to compare medical conservative management with interventional treatments like neurosurgery, radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and endovascular procedures to see which approach better reduces the risk of death or disabling stroke over 10 years. There is also a nested trial to evaluate whether embolization before surgery or radiosurgery improves treatment success and safety. The interventional therapies studied include surgical removal of the AVM when it is safely operable, radiation therapy for smaller AVMs less than 3 cm that cannot be safely operated on, radiosurgery, and curative embolization. Patients judged by a multidisciplinary team to possibly benefit from endovascular treatment before surgery or radiation may be randomly assigned to receive embolization or not. The conservative group receives medical management for symptoms, and if bleeding or infarction occurs, they may become candidates for interventional therapy. Participants will be followed for up to 10 years to monitor outcomes such as death from any cause or disabling stroke, measured by the Rankin Scale. The study will track neurological events, treatment complications, and the success of AVM occlusion. Researchers will regularly assess participants neurological status and adverse events. This long-term follow-up aims to provide clearer guidance on the safest and most effective management strategies for brain AVMs.
CONDITIONS
Treatment of Brain AVMs (TOBAS) Study
D
Daniel Roy, MD
T
Tim Darsaut, MD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Interventional Therapy | Conservative Management |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Active treatment for brain AVMs using neurosurgery, stereotactic radiation therapy, or curative embolization. The specific option is determined by a multidisciplinary team, considering the AVM's size, location, and operability. | Non-interventional approach involving medical management such as observation, control of symptoms (e.g., seizures), and blood pressure monitoring. No surgery, radiation, or embolization is performed. |
| Role in trial | Active comparator arm, assigned to receive one of the procedure-based therapies based on suitability. | Control comparator, assigned to conservative follow-up and medical symptom management without procedural intervention. |
| Primary use | Aims to eliminate or reduce the risk of hemorrhage and neurological complications by removing or obliterating the AVM with surgery, focused radiation, or embolization. | Aims to minimize intervention-related risks by managing symptoms medically, observing for changes, and attempting to prevent hemorrhage without active AVM removal. |
| How it is given or performed | Participants are evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Depending on AVM characteristics, they may have surgical resection, radiation therapy if the AVM is small and inoperable, or embolization if curative. | Participants receive routine medical care, seizure and blood pressure management, and regular imaging or neurological follow-up. No procedural therapy is performed. |
| Evidence status | Interventional therapy is supported by randomized trials and meta-analyses, but outcomes vary by AVM features. Procedural risks include perioperative stroke, hemorrhage, or disability. Data is mixed on net benefit, especially for unruptured AVMs. | Conservative (non-interventional) management shows favorable outcomes in some studies, with lower risks of procedure-related complications but inherent risk of spontaneous hemorrhage over time. |
| Important risks | Risks include disabling stroke, death, perioperative hemorrhage, neurological deficits, and complications related to surgery, radiation, or embolization. | Risks include spontaneous AVM rupture leading to hemorrhage, stroke, disability, or death, though no added procedure-related risk is present. |
| Important limitations | Benefit-risk balance is unclear for unruptured AVMs; procedures carry a significant risk of new disability, and benefit varies by AVM type and patient selection. Long-term benefit over conservative management remains debated. | Observation does not eliminate lifelong risk of spontaneous hemorrhage or stroke from AVMs. Not all patients are suitable for non-interventional management, especially after rupture or in high-risk AVMs. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Varies based on treatment type and patient condition
Participants receive interventional therapies such as neurosurgery, radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and/or embolization, or conservative medical management as determined by the treating physician and multidisciplinary team.
Visit schedule varies depending on treatment modality and patient needs
Duration - Up to 10 years
Participants are followed for up to 10 years post-treatment or post-randomization to monitor for neurological events, treatment outcomes, and overall health status.
Regular follow-up visits scheduled over 10 years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
R H Wilkins
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3885072/Jean Raymond, TEAM collaborative group
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21320821/R F Spetzler, N A Martin
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3760956/Kevin M Cockroft
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17962584/Ian G Fleetwood, Gary K Steinberg
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11897302/E Magro, J-C Gentric, T E Darsaut...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27236732/L Pierot, J Fiehler, C Cognard...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24436345/Janneke van Beijnum, H Bart van der Worp, Dennis R Buis...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22068993/Tim E Darsaut, Elsa Magro, Michel W Bojanowski...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36087316/Elsa Magro, Jean-Christophe Gentric, André Lima Batista...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28862547/Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest
Collaborating Sponsor