Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years.
Birgit Thilander
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19304760/Actively Recruiting
Led by Myo Munchee (Operations) Pty Ltd · Updated on 2025-07-28
48
Participants Needed
2
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating the effects of Myo Munchee therapy and Oral Motor Therapy OMT in children aged 3 to 5 years who have maxillary deficiency and orofacial myofunctional dysfunction OMD. This trial aims to study these treatments, which focus on improving the development of the upper jaw and oral muscles, potentially enhancing health and wellbeing in this young population. The study is conducted across multiple centers and is randomized and controlled over six months. Participants are divided into four groups a control group with no intervention a group using the Myo Munchee device with a specific protocol a group following an Oral Motor Therapy program and a group receiving both Myo Munchee and Oral Motor Therapy. All groups undergo clinical assessments and complete questionnaires at the start, week 10, and week 26 of the study. The Myo Munchee is a small handheld device designed to help with issues like drooling, mouth breathing, and teeth grinding, while Oral Motor Therapy is delivered by speech-language pathologists to support feeding and swallowing difficulties. During the 26-week study, participants will be regularly evaluated through clinical and questionnaire measurements to track improvements in maxillary expansion, resting mouth posture, oral motor function, and sleep and behavior. The study monitors these outcomes to understand the therapies effects and safety. Total participation lasts approximately six months, with visits scheduled at baseline, mid-study, and study completion to assess progress and treatment impact.
CONDITIONS
Trial to Compare the Effects of Myo Munchee Therapy and Oral Motor Therapy (OMT) in Pediatric Patients to Treat Maxillary Deficiency and Orofacial Myofunctional Dysfunction (OMD).
I
Ignatius Bourke, Bachelor of Science (Hons)
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Myo Munchee (Operations) Pty Ltd
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Myo Munchee device only | Oral Motor Therapy only | Combined Myo Munchee + OMT | Control (no intervention) | Standard myofunctional therapy-guided OMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Use of the Myo Munchee chewing device as a device-only intervention | Oral Motor Therapy (exercise-based intervention) delivered by speech‑language pathologists | Combination of Myo Munchee plus Oral Motor Therapy | No treatment or intervention received (control) | Therapy‑guided orofacial myofunctional exercises delivered by professionals, as common clinical practice |
| Primary use | To promote orofacial muscle function through chewing device use | To strengthen and coordinate mouth muscle movements via therapy exercises | To combine chewing device and oral motor exercises for dual stimulation | Serves as baseline to compare active interventions | Represents current therapy approach using guided oral motor and myofunctional exercises |
| Evidence status | Effect not yet established; under investigation in this randomized trial | Common clinical practice; evidence for use in pediatric feeding/swallowing issues exists but limited quality | Effectiveness to be determined by combining device with therapy | No therapeutic effect expected; serves as comparative baseline | Therapy techniques are used in clinical practice and show positive trends, though high‑quality evidence is limited |
| Important limitations | Effectiveness and long‑term outcomes are not yet known | Limited high‑quality evidence and variable study designs in existing literature | Unknown whether combining leads to greater benefit than single interventions | Does not reflect any intervention; not used clinically | Evidence base shows positive trends but lacks consistency across studies |
| Patient relevant outcomes | Unknown; trial will measure maxillary expansion, posture, and sleep/behavior outcomes | Likely improvements in feeding, swallowing, posture, but evidence quality variable | Potential for combined benefit; yet to be assessed | No improvement expected; baseline comparison | Some evidence indicates better feeding and swallowing outcomes in children |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 26 weeks
Participants receive either Myo Munchee therapy, Oral Motor Therapy, both therapies combined, or no intervention, according to their assigned group. These therapies aim to improve maxillary deficiency and orofacial myofunctional dysfunction over the study period.
3 visits (at baseline, week 10, and week 26)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
4
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Birgit Thilander
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19304760/Myo Munchee (Operations) Pty Ltd
Lead Sponsor