Actively Recruiting
Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube
Led by University of Minnesota · Updated on 2025-06-05
200
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
95 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Any patient that is scheduled for EBUS-TBNA procedure
You will not qualify if you...
- Those who are not safe to receive moderate sedation or flexible bronchoscopy
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
J
Jamie Heisdorffer
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NA
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here