Valve-in-Surgical-Valve With SAPIEN 3 for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality.
Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Raj R Makkar, Amar Krishnaswami...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34003666/Actively Recruiting
Led by Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval · Updated on 2026-03-24
310
Participants Needed
7
Research Sites
104 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are investigating valve performance after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement ViV-TAVR in patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve failure. The study focuses on comparing hemodynamic optimization using Doppler-echocardiography versus cardiac catheterization measurements. This trial aims to clarify differences in valve gradient assessments and better understand procedural-device failure rates reported in previous ViV-TAVR studies. The study involves patients with stented surgical bioprosthetic valves sized 25 mm or smaller who are scheduled for a ViV-TAVR procedure using the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve or its newer versions. After valve implantation, participants are randomly assigned to have further interventions guided either by Doppler-echocardiographic measurements or by invasive hemodynamic measurements, including simultaneous aortic and ventricular pressure recordings. If a residual mean gradient of 20 mmHg or more is found by the assigned measurement method, balloon post-dilation with a non-compliant balloon will be performed. Participants will be followed for up to five years with evaluations at 1 month, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Assessments include quality of life, periprocedural complications, residual transvalvular gradient, valve performance measures such as prosthesis-patient mismatch and aortic regurgitation, heart failure status, exercise capacity, structural valve degeneration indicators, and need for valve re-intervention. Safety and clinical outcomes will be monitored regularly, including rehospitalizations and changes in left ventricle mass.
CONDITIONS
Valve Hemodynamic Optimization Based on Doppler-Echocardiography vs Catheterization Measurements Following ViV TAVR
J
Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD
E
Emilie Pelletier Beaumont, MSc
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | ViV-TAVR with Doppler-echocardiography guidance | ViV-TAVR with invasive hemodynamic guidance |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Valve-in-valve TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve, with further post-implantation intervention (such as balloon post-dilation) guided by Doppler-echocardiographic measurements of the residual gradient. | Valve-in-valve TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve, with further post-implantation intervention guided by invasive hemodynamic measurements (catheter-based simultaneous aortic and ventricular pressure recordings) of the residual gradient. |
| Role in the trial | Tested as a strategy for post-implant procedural optimization after valve-in-valve TAVR for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. | Used as the comparator strategy for procedural optimization after valve-in-valve TAVR in the same patient population. |
| Primary use in treatment | Used to guide decisions about post-implant intervention following ViV-TAVR, aiming to optimize valve function and reduce residual gradients based on non-invasive Doppler ultrasound. | Used to guide decisions about additional intervention after ViV-TAVR based on direct invasive pressure measurements, aiming to optimize valve outcomes and reduce gradients. |
| How it is performed | Doppler-echocardiography is performed after valve implantation to assess the mean gradient across the valve. If the gradient is 20 mmHg or above, further balloon post-dilation is performed using a non-compliant balloon. | Simultaneous aortic and ventricular pressure measurements are obtained using catheters after valve implantation. If the mean residual gradient is 20 mmHg or higher, further balloon post-dilation is performed. |
| Evidence status | Hemodynamic and patient outcome results with Doppler-echocardiography guidance after ViV-TAVR are still under active study in randomized trials. Prior observational data confirm ViV-TAVR is effective for failed bioprosthetic aortic valves with good mid-term outcomes. | Long-term published data support the use of invasive hemodynamic measurements for procedural optimization post-TAVR, but randomized comparisons to non-invasive strategies are limited. |
| Important limitations | It is not yet established whether non-invasive Doppler-echocardiography is as precise as invasive pressure measurements for guiding further intervention following ViV-TAVR. Study results are pending. | The need for invasive catheter measurements may add procedural complexity and risk compared to non-invasive alternatives. It is unclear whether the extra invasiveness provides superior long-term results in this setting. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Periprocedural
Participants undergo a valve-in-valve TAVR procedure using the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve. After valve implantation, further intervention is guided either by Doppler-echocardiographic measurements or invasive hemodynamic measurements. Balloon post-dilation may be performed if residual mean gradient is ≥20 mmHg based on the assigned measurement method.
1 procedure visit (in-person)
Duration - Up to 5 years
Participants are monitored for valve performance, heart function, and safety outcomes through assessments including quality of life, exercise capacity, valve function, and structural valve degeneration up to 5 years after treatment.
Visits at 1 month, 12 months, and yearly up to 5 years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Raj R Makkar, Amar Krishnaswami...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34003666/John T Saxon, Keith B Allen, David J Cohen...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29593832/Danny Dvir, John G Webb, Sabine Bleiziffer...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25005653/Leonardo de Freitas Campos Guimarães, Marina Urena, Harindra C Wijeysundera...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30354588/Sabine Bleiziffer, Matheus Simonato, John G Webb...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32592401/Jean-Michel Paradis, Maria Del Trigo, Rishi Puri...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26516006/John G Webb, Dale J Murdoch, Maria C Alu...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31146808/VARC-3 WRITING COMMITTEE:, Philippe Généreux, Nicolo Piazza...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33888385/John Phineas O'Donnell, Cróchán J O'Sullivan
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31867060/Bernhard Wernly, Ann-Katrin Zappe, Axel Unbehaun...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30003366/Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
Lead Sponsor