Actively Recruiting
Warm Versus Conventional 2% Lignocaine for IANB Efficacy
Led by Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan · Updated on 2025-02-03
200
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
12 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
The study compares the anesthetic efficacy of warm versus conventional 2% lignocaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular molars, evaluating success rates and onset time.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Warm Versus Conventional 2% Lignocaine for IANB Efficacy
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Permanent teeth with acutely inflamed pulp without swelling or draining sinus
- Carious mandibular molars
- Patients aged 18 to 50 years
- Systemically healthy patients
- Patients willing to attend follow-up visits and provide written consent
You will not qualify if you...
- Patients currently taking painkillers or antibiotics before the procedure
- Teeth with calcified canals or previously treated teeth
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients who are immunocompromised, anxious, or mentally handicapped
- Patients allergic to lignocaine
- Teeth that are non-vital or necrotic
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Armed Forces Institute Of Dentistry
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 46000
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
M
Maha Ali Mirza, BDS
CONTACT
K
Kanza Zafar, BDS
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
DOUBLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here