Actively Recruiting
Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of Risk (Wisdom Study)
Led by University of California, San Francisco · Updated on 2025-11-25
100000
Participants Needed
11
Research Sites
521 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
Sponsors
U
University of California, San Francisco
Lead Sponsor
P
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Collaborating Sponsor
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Most physicians still use a one-size-fits-all approach to breast screening in which all women, regardless of their personal history, family history or genetics (except BRCA carriers) are recommended to have annual mammograms starting at age 40. Mammograms benefit women by detecting cancers early when they are easier to treat, but they are not perfect. Recent news stories have discussed some of the potential harms: large numbers of positive results that cause stressful recalls for additional mammograms and biopsies. With the current screening approach, half of the women who undergo annual screening for ten years will have at least one false positive biopsy. Potentially more important are cancer diagnoses for growths that might never come to clinical attention if left alone (called "overdiagnosis"). This can lead to unnecessary treatment. Even more concerning is evidence that up to 20% of breast cancers detected today may fall into the category of "overdiagnosis." The WISDOM 1.0 study compares annual screening with a risk-based breast cancer screening schedule, based upon each woman's personal risk of breast cancer. The investigators have designed the study to be inclusive of all, so that even women who might be nervous about being randomly assigned to receive a particular type of care (a procedure that is typical in clinical studies) will still be able to participate by choosing the type of care they receive. For participants in the risk-based screening arm, each woman will receive a personal risk assessment that includes her family and medical history, breast density measurement and tests for genes (mutations and variations) linked to the development of breast cancer. Women who have the highest personal risk of developing breast cancer will receive more frequent screening, while women with a lower personal risk would receive less frequent screening. No woman will be screened less than is recommended by the USPSTF breast cancer screening guidelines. If this study is successful, women will gain a realistic understanding of their personal risk of breast cancer as well as strategies to reduce their risk, and fewer women will suffer from the anxiety of false positive mammograms and unnecessary biopsies. The investigators believe this study has the potential to transform breast cancer screening in America. Starting in Spring 2023, WISDOM's design shifted to remove the randomized option, but will continue with the preference/self-selection option for participation (WISDOM 2.0). Participants will therefore continue to choose their study arm (Personalized or Annual) rather than have the option to be randomized. This study design change was made after review of the WISDOM 1.0 data by an independent monitoring committee, which indicates that personalized screening does not cause harm. WISDOM 2.0 has also lowered the eligibility to ages 30-74. Women ages 30-39 will only be offered to join the Personalized Arm.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of Risk (Wisdom Study)
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Identify as female
- Age between 30 and 74 years old
- Reside in the United States
You will not qualify if you...
- Previous diagnosis of breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- Prior prophylactic bilateral mastectomy
- Unable to provide consent
- Not proficient in English or Spanish
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 11 locations
1
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
Actively Recruiting
2
University of California Irvine
Irvine, California, United States, 92618
Actively Recruiting
3
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
Actively Recruiting
4
University of California Davis
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
Actively Recruiting
5
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, United States, 92093
Actively Recruiting
6
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
Actively Recruiting
7
TopLine MD Alliance
Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
Actively Recruiting
8
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
Actively Recruiting
9
Louisiana State University
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
Active, Not Recruiting
10
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, United States, 10021
Actively Recruiting
11
Edith Sanford Breast Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57117
Active, Not Recruiting
Research Team
A
Allison Fiscalini, MPH
CONTACT
J
Jennifer Atamer
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
SCREENING
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here