Bihorel

This is a long-term follow-up trial to the post-authorisation efficacy and safety (PAES) trial (trial 20-HMedIdeS-19). The trial will include patients who participated in the PAES trial and were transplanted with a new kidney after treatment with imlifidase (trial drug) or standard of care medication. Imlifidase is a medicine used to prevent the body from rejecting a newly transplanted kidney and is used before transplantation in adults who have antibodies against the donor kidney and are considered 'highly sensitised' based on a positive crossmatch test. The purpose of this follow-up trial is to fulfil requirements from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to continue to evaluate efficacy (kidney function) and safety (side effects) over time, for the patients who were transplanted with a new kidney in the PAES trial. The patients will be followed for up to 5 years after transplantation in the PAES trial to collect valuable long-term data.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab in adults with chronic and/or subacute CLE who are refractory and/or intolerant to antimalarial therapy. The study has a randomized, 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study period (Week 0 to Week 23), to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab. The double-blind study period will be followed by an open-label, uncontrolled treatment period in which all participants will receive treatment with anifrolumab from Week 24 to Week 51. After the open-label treatment period, participants will enter a 12-week Safety Follow-up Period.

The purpose of this study is to measure cardiovascular outcomes with orforglipron compared with placebo in participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Participation in the study will last about 5 years.

This is a Phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of baxdrostat versus placebo, on the reduction of Seated Blood Pressure (SBP) and achieving normalization of the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) in approximately 180 participants ≥ 18 years of age with Primary Aldosteronism (PA), with or without prior treatment with Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs) or potassium-sparing diuretics. Baxdrostat (or placebo) will be administered once daily, up-titrated after 2 weeks based on clinical response and tolerability. The study is planned to be conducted globally in approximately 90 study centres and 12 countries.

Sensitivity to final status on presumed HBV serological marker positive subjects will be calculated. Specificity will be calculated from hospitalized patients and blood donors specimens. False Initial Reactive Rate will be calculated on fresh hospitalized patient samples for Access HBsAg assay only (Qualitative).

Optimizing the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) will remain a major public health concern for decades to come. T2DM has already affected 4% of the French population and generates each year over 12 billion euros of expenditure. By combining therapies, oral and/or injectable (insulin or analogues of GLP-1), the current management of T2DM provides two thirds of patients with a satisfactory metabolic control (HbA1c \< 7%) and reduced incidence of cardiovascular complications. Its effect on mortality, however, remains more limited, presumably because of the persistence of other cardiovascular risk factors. A recent study has confirmed that French patients with T2DM present an overall mortality risk significantly higher than the general population. In France, this group registered a mortality of 32 deaths per 1000 persons. Bariatric surgery is now a recognized method for the treatment of severe obesity. It allows for the permanent loss of at least 50% of initial excess weight. In obese patients, this surgery is also associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular risk factors and particularly T2D. A recent meta-analysis of retrospective studies available suggests that surgery results in remission of T2DM in over 75% of cases. The only prospective randomized study showed that gastric restriction by placing a gastric band, provides better glycemic control than just medical treatment in obese patients with recently discovered T2DM. The gastric by-pass (GBP) which also includes an intestinal by-pass, seems to have an even higher metabolic efficiency than gastric bypass alone. In patients with T2DM, the GBP restores postprandial insulin secretion independently of weight loss. Despite the significant morbidity of the intervention, long-term results seem broadly supportive of the GBP. In a large case-control study, GBP was associated with a decrease of 90% of deaths related to diabetes. In a controlled study conducted in surgical candidates obese diabetics, the GBP decreased the overall world mortality by 75% after 6 years. Despite these very encouraging data, the GBP is now proposed to only a small proportion (\< 1%) of patients likely to benefit from the procedure.

This study, called EPICAM-PMCF-G6, is part of a Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) requested by the French Health Technology Assessment Committee (CNEDiMTS), following the listing of the System for reimbursement under the national healthcare system in France. This study is carried following the European Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices (Medical Devices Regulation, MDR) and thus falls into the category of clinical investigations (CI) of Medical Devices (MD). The System evaluated in this clinical investigation bears CE-marking (market approval according to the MDR) and is used in accordance with its intended purpose. As this study does not involve any invasive or burdensome procedures, it is classified as a non-invasive PMCF investigation of category 4.1. according to the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM).

The gynaecological examination consists of a breast examination, abdominal examination, inspection of the vulva, vaginal touch and pelvic examination with a speculum. The latter is essential for the insertion and removal of intrauterine devices (IUDs), for the diagnosis and screening of pathologies that may cause pelvic symptoms, for assessment of the vaginal wall and for regular screening for cervical cancer. The gynaecological examination is feared by many women because of the feeling of exposure, vulnerability and loss of control. The parallel with a sexual position is particularly disturbing for patients who do not want to see this representation mixed with a medical necessity, which can lead some women to have irregular or even discontinued follow-up. For the past ten years, medical practice theses and midwifery dissertations have evaluated the interest of another position for the pelvic examination with the speculum : the lateral decubitus position in which the patient lies on her side. The lateral decubitus pelvic examination seems to be an alternative for comfort and respect for modesty, which is favoured by the patients. This examination position would have advantages in situations of anterior anatomical position of the position of the cervix, prolapse, severe obesity, hip pathology or significant reluctance to the examination. The effectiveness of this technique in terms of examination performance needs to be evaluated to promote its dissemination. The impact of an examination that is better experienced by patients is that of better adherence and therefore better follow-up, which is the particular challenge of primary care. Single group: gynaecological examination in lateral decubitus, conventional repositioning if unsuccessful

Participants include men and women ≥ 40 years of age with T2DM, established CV disease, a history of HTN with an SBP of at least 130 mmHg at screening, who meet the predefined serum potassium level, and with at least one additional risk factor for HF. The study will include an optional pre-screening period to facilitate sites' identification of potentially eligible participants to enter the full screening assessments. Participants will not be required to visit the site and no informed consent is required for the optional pre-screening period. The pre-screening assessments do not replace the full screening tests at Visit 1. Upon entering the screening period, all consented participants (after signature of screening ICF) will be screened during an up to 14-day screening period. Participants who meet all screening inclusion/exclusion criteria but are not treated with SGLT2i or are treated for less than 4 weeks will enter a run-in period with dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily for at least 4 weeks (and not more than 6 weeks) before randomisation. Site visits will take place at approximately 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, and 34-weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months. The study closure procedures will be initiated when the predetermined number of the first secondary endpoint events (ie, the composite of hospitalisation for HF or CV death) is predicted to have occurred i.e., the PACD. In case of premature discontinuation of the blinded study intervention, participants will remain in the study. Unless a participant meets the dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria, they will continue to receive open label dapagliflozin 10 mg. It is important that the scheduled study visits and data collection continue according to the study protocol.

This Phase II, platform, open-label, multicenter study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of volrustomig in combination with anticancer drugs in various solid tumor types. This platform study currently includes 2 substudies: Substudy 1: metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) (non-squamous \[NSQ\]). Participants will be randomized in two treatment arms: Arm 1A and Arm 1B. Substudy 2: mNSCLC (squamous \[SQ\] or NSQ). Participants will enroll to the Arm 2A only. All arms will test a volrustomig dosing in combination with chemotherapy.