Carcassonne

Patients recruitment will be curry out in 31 geriatric or cardiologic centres. Patients will be recruited for 24 months. Each patient will participate in the study for 12 months (baseline visit, follow-up phone calls every 3 months up to 12 months i.e., at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months). The following data will be collected at teh baseline visit: Medical history, demography, clinical data, frailty status assessed by Fried, Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST), triggers for cardiac decompensation, biological examination, genetic testing, echocardiographic data and other data. Bone scanning with 99mTc-DPD or 99mTc-HMDP (early or late time with SPECT will be done during hospitalization or after discharge depending on availability at the imaging centre. The results of each examination will be evaluated to establish the existence and degree of fixation in the myocardium and to determine its distribution. Follow-up phone s will be conducted every 3 months up to 12 months to collect hospitalizations for heart failure, hospitalizations for other cardio-vascular events, hospitalizations for non-cardiac events, admission to nursing homes or long-term care (LTC) facilities and death

The advent of CDK4/6 inhibitors has changed the outlook of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2- breast cancer. Moreover, including CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment regimens strategies has led to significant gains in disease-free survival. The phase III NATALEE trial demonstrated the efficacy of an adjuvant three-year treatment with ribociclib in prolonging invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients with intermediate and high-risk HR+ HER2- early breast cancer. Contrarily to similar studies of CDK4/6 inhibitors in this setting, NATALEE included a group of patients with intermediate clinical risk (pT1-2 pN1, pT3-4 pN0 or pT2 pN0 with histological grade 3 or grade 2 with Ki67≥ 20%). These patients are usually considered for adjuvant chemotherapy based on their clinicopathological conditions or the results of a genomic signature (e.g. Oncotype Dx). Nevertheless, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients is uncertain (and likely small) in the context of an adjuvant treatment strategy that includes a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. As such, a de-escalation trial could demonstrate that patients with intermediate-risk breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors could be spared the dreaded chemotherapy side effects while ensuring similar survival outcomes. In order to be generalizable and practice changing, a trial in this setting should aim to be as pragmatic as possible, particularly in inclusion criteria, with the required resources for patient inclusion and delivery of care being as similar as possible to those employed in usual care. As such, chemotherapy eligibility should be defined similarly to routine clinical practice in the participating centers (i.e. using routine clinicopathological parameters and/or genomic signatures). While single-arm designs could help address non-inferiority in the previously mentioned setting, they are usually compared to historical controls and lack external validation. Moreover, in some settings, like early breast cancer, the standard of care may change relatively quickly (e.g. Oncotype Dx-based chemotherapy de-escalation or adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors use), rendering the comparison to historical controls challenging, limiting the study conclusions and their impact on clinical practice. Finally, there is no consensus on the optimal non-inferiority threshold in single-arm trials using historical controls as a comparator. As such, randomized controlled non-inferiority trials with a strict non-inferiority margin remain the gold standard design to prove that a de-escalated treatment regimen is safe and advantageous, and the only ones capable of producing level IA evidence according to ESMO (Trapani et al., Annals of Oncology 2022).

Minimally invasive surgery has developed widely since the 1980s and has revolutionized the practices of surgeons. In urology, the development of laparoscopy and then robot-assisted surgery has considerably improved the management of pathologies. In France, as in all the countries concerned, the spread of robotic surgery has taken place without prior studies validating this new technology, nor organizational rules in terms of quality and access to care. The report of the Haute Autorité de Santé dated November 2016 underlines the weakness of the methodological quality of studies and meta-analyzes evaluating robot-assisted total prostatectomy compared to other surgical techniques by laparotomy or conventional laparoscopy. It therefore appears important to evaluate in a large study the interest of this technique in order to help the authorities to decide on the real benefit of this technology and to provide reliable answers to the patients.

This is a multicenter prospective cohort study aiming at assessing baseline DVT-Burden and other prognostic factors for predicting the occurrence and the severity of PTS. Patients diagnosed with a first episode of DVT of the lower limbs are recruited in offices and departments of vascular medicine. They will be informed of the study by their physician. If patients agree to take part and meet the eligibility criteria, they will be included consecutively in the study after signing an informed consent form. The study will include follow-up visits at one week (D7±2, for patients participating in the biological research only), 1 month (D30±5), 3 months (D90±5) and 6 months (D180±5). At each visit, the following examinations will be carried out: * Assessment of symptoms and clinical signs to evaluate the Villalta score. * Venous ultrasound evaluation of the lower limbs by colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS). Data collected will be useful to calculate the VVI score planned at the study analysis phase. At the D0, D7, D30 and D90 visits, blood samples will be taken for research purposes to assess factors of inflammation, coagulation and fibrinolysis. At the D90 and D180 visits, the patient will also be asked to complete the VEINES-QOL and SF-36 quality of life questionnaires. The patient's participation in the research will end at the end of the D180 visit.

Pulse is a randomized non-inferiority phase III clinical trial assessing a new mode of immunotherapy administration based on increased interval time between 2 infusions as maintenance treatment in Pulse arm compared with the conventional administration in Control arm. In both treatment arms, pembrolizumab alone or combined with pemetrexed is allowed as maintenance treatment. Indeed : In Pulse arm : Pembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered to patients every 6 weeks (Q6W) plus, in the absence of contra-indication pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 will be administered every 3 weeks (Q3W). In control arm : Pembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered to patients every 3 weeks (Q3W) or 400 mg every 6 weeks plus,in the absence of contra-indication pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 will be administered every 3 weeks (Q3W).

PERSON-AL is a multicentric, interventional, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, stratified by centre, study comparing two arms: usual care versus intervention (personalized care preceded by a standardized assessment) Principal Objective : To evaluate the impact of a personalized intervention for the management of agitation due to psycho-behavioral symptoms on the use of scheduled and unscheduled hospitalizations at 18 months in patients with AD and related disorders. Secondary Objectives: A- To evaluate the impact of a personalized intervention at 18 months on: For the patient: 1. Unscheduled hospitalizations, 2. Severity of agitation symptoms, 3. The frequency and severity of emerging psycho-behavioral symptoms, other than agitation, 4. Prescription of psychotropic drugs, 5. Quality of life. For the caregiver: 6. Distress related to psycho-behavioral symptoms, 7. All causes hospitalizations, 8. Quality of life. B- Evaluate the medico-economic impact of this personalized intervention, and in particular: 1. Its efficiency compared to usual management by means of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, from the community perspective and over a time horizon of 18 months, 2. The actual cost of patient's standardized assessment and personalized management 3. The use of care and associated costs for the caregiver and the efficiency of caregiver targeted intervention.

The RAINBO program is a studies group which proposes personalized treatment of patients suffering from endometrial cancer according to their molecular profile. the RAINBO-RED study allows observation or maintenance treatment with targeted therapy for one year (olaparib). This after standard therapy. The goal is to improve recurrence-free survival of patients treated with Olaparib.

Comparative interventional prospective phase 3, randomised, open-label, multicentric trial comparing the combination of radiotherapy and pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy to systemic treatment as first line treatment of patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with synchronous metastases.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess whether adding telemonitoring (the digital telemonitoring platform "CUREETY TECHCARE"), to standard care, will benefit patients with previously untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer starting first-line cancer therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is patient quality of life improved by using the telemonitoring platform? * Are patients hospitalized less frequently when using the telemonitoring platform? * Is the patient overall survival improved by telemonitoring ? Researchers will compare data from patients using telemonitoring while receiving standard care with data from patients receiving only standard care. Participants using telemonitoring will answer questions about their symptoms on the platform. The platform will analyze these symptoms, assess the patient's general condition and provide advice accordingly. Medical staff will also access the platform to monitor the patient's general condition and contact them if necessary.

The main objective of the ETAPH project is to offer breast cancer patients multidisciplinary care that will limit the impact of adverse effects related to hormone therapy treatment and improve their quality of life. The achievement of this objective is based on therapeutic education and nursing follow-up throughout the first year of treatment, which, thanks to active listening and coordination of the various players, will enable global and personalized patient care.