La Roche Sur Yon

Researchers are looking for more ways to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that is recurrent. Researchers want to learn if recurrent advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) responds (gets smaller or goes away) after treatment with belzutifan (MK-6482) and zanzalintinib compared to cabozantinib. The goal of this study is to learn if: People who take belzutifan and zanzalintinib live longer overall and without the cancer getting worse than people who take cabozantinib.

The main purpose of the SYNERGY-OUTCOMES study is to find out whether retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in people with high-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The study will enroll adults who have MASLD based on non-invasive tests (NITs), which indicate they are more likely to develop MALO. Participants will be randomly assigned within a Master Protocol to receive either retatrutide (N1T-MC-RT01), tirzepatide (N1T-MC-TZ01) or placebo. The trial plans to enroll about 4,500 adults and will run for approximately 224 weeks. Participants may have up to approximately 25 to 30 clinic visits throughout the study to monitor their health, complete study procedures, and assess liver function and disease progression. Once the study is complete, eligible participants may participate in an optional 2-year extension study, in which all participants will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide, even if they received placebo in the main study.

Every year, 12500 primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are diagnosed in France. Metastases occur in half of RCC patients. Management of metastatic RCC is based on systemic treatments (targeted therapies/immunotherapy). However, resistance to systemic treatment is frequent. In case of progression, usual therapeutic attitude is initiating another systemic therapy. Because of the emergence of resistant tumor clonal cells, some patients progress only on few sites while the rest of tumor burden is controlled. In this setting named oligoprogressive disease \[isolated progression of \<3-5 metastase(s)\], ablative treatments of these evolving metastatic sites could allow a disease control and a reduced risk of new metastases occurrence by tumor-cell reembolization. Such strategy is challenging to prolong ongoing systemic treatment and delay further lines. Although RCC was considered radioresistant and radiotherapy with conventional fractionation was mainly used for palliation of symptoms, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), by delivering high dose in one or few fractions, allows local control for about 90% of RCC metastases through various radiobiological pathways. Furthermore, some data suggest that high-dose focal irradiation of RCC could induce a systemic antitumor response mediated by immunologic effectors(1). This phenomenon ("abscopal effect") could be enhanced in patients under immunotherapy, including anti-PD1. Several retrospective studies and one non-randomized phase-II study highly suggest the interest of SRT as focal ablative treatment in RCC oligometastases with excellent local control rates and low toxicity(2,3). Furthermore, the multicentric retrospective study the sponsor recently conducted within the GETUG group among 101 metastatic RCC patients with oligoprogression under systemic therapy highlighted that SRT on progressive sites provided a median of 8.6-month progression-free survival and allowed to continue current systemic line for 10.5 months. However, to date, there are no prospective data assessing the interest of SRT for management of oligoprogressive metastatic RCC. The sponsor aim to prospectively evaluate the interest of SRT as a therapeutic strategy for local control of oligoprogressive metastatic RCC under ongoing systemic treatment, and consequently delay subsequent systemic treatment.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of baxdrostat in combination with dapagliflozin, compared with placebo and dapagliflozin, in reducing the risk of the composite endpoint of ≥ 50% sustained decline in eGFR, kidney failure, HF events, or CV death in participants with CKD and HTN. This study consists of a 4-week dapagliflozin Run-in Period for participants untreated with SGLT2i at screening, and a double-blinded period where participants will receive either baxdrostat/dapagliflozin or placebo/dapagliflozin. Site visits will take place at 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 34, and 52-weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months. The study closure procedures will be initiated when the predetermined number of primary endpoint events is predicted to have occurred (N = 845) ie, the PACD. All randomised participants including any participants who have prematurely discontinued study intervention will be scheduled for a SCV within 6 weeks of the PACD. This period can be extended by AstraZeneca. In case of premature discontinuation of blinded study intervention, participants will continue in the study and receive dapagliflozin 10 mg, unless the participant meets dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria. Baxdrostat/placebo should not be administered without dapagliflozin: baxdrostat/placebo should be interrupted if dapagliflozin is interrupted (baxdrostat/placebo may be resumed with dapagliflozin, if dapagliflozin is resumed), and should be permanently discontinued if dapagliflozin is permanently discontinued. If study intervention is temporarily or permanently discontinued, the participant should remain in the study, and it is important that the scheduled study visits (including the PTDV for participants with permanent discontinuation of study intervention) and data collection continue according to the study protocol until the SCV.

IFCT-2202 ROSIE study aims to incorporate a broad-panel centralized NGS testing at baseline in all patients with completely resected NSCLC with common EGFR mutation after confirmation of an optimal preoperative extension assessment and with a centralized review of the quality of the surgical excision. Furthermore, the IFCT-2202 ROSIE study also aims to study the molecular events associated with relapse on, or after osimertinib exposure, that should result in the opportunity to accede to optimal treatment in case of metastatic relapse.

This study is to assess the burden of disease in adolescent and adult participants with moderate or severe alopecia areata (AA), non-segmental vitiligo (NSV), or moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in a large global real-world participant population.

The primary objectives are to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in participants who receive sotorasib with platinum doublet chemotherapy versus participants who receive pembrolizumab with platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Subjects must continue on the treatment regimen that the subject was receiving in the prior study. Dose changes of any of the prior therapies subjects were receiving on the previous protocol are allowed after medical monitor approval. The day 1 visit for this study should coincide with the last treatment visit for the study the subject will be enrolling from (≤ 7 days post last visit of parent study). The subjects will be followed according to the local institution's standard of care and will be required to return to the institution every 24 weeks (± 7 days) to review adverse events (AEs), collect concomitant medications and confirm that no discontinuation criteria are met. At each visit and at every 12 weeks (IP only visit) subjects are to return all dispensed study drug and to receive more study drug if applicable. All AEs (new and ongoing from the study the subject is enrolling from) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (including death), will be collected from the time the subject signs the consent form until the end of study visit. After the marketing approval in South Korea, this study continued as "post marketing clinical study" in South Korea. In the rest of the countries which participated in this study, this study continued as clinical study.

This is a Phase IIIb, single-arm, open-label, multicentre, multinational study assessing the efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd in participants with HR-positive, HER2 IHC 0, locally advanced inoperable or metastatic breast cancer refractory to endocrine therapy. Refer to the study schema (Figure 1) and SoA (Section 1.3) for overall design and required assessments. Day 1 is defined as the first day of study treatment. Approximately 100 participants will be treated in this study with Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (21-day cycle), up to a maximum of 540 mg for patients ≥ 90kg. Participants will receive study intervention until RECIST 1.1 defined radiological progression by investigator unless there is evidence of unacceptable toxicity or if the participant requests to stop the study treatment. Written consent is required from all participants for newly acquired tumour biopsy collection at baseline or for providing a tumour biopsy sample collected within 6 weeks prior to initiating Dato-DXd and, if feasible, at progression. This sample will be used to assess for HER2 and TROP2 expression and exploratory analysis of biomarkers of response. Participants are also expected to consent for repeated liquid biopsy at baseline, during the treatment period, and at progression to evaluate biomarkers of response and resistance. (Sample collection in China will comply with local regulatory requirements.) Tumour imaging will occur every 8 weeks (± 1 week) after the first dose of study drug for 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks (± 1 week) thereafter until RECIST 1.1 disease progression as assessed by the investigator or the start of subsequent anticancer therapy.

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of elacestrant versus standard endocrine therapy in participants with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer with high risk of recurrence.