Morlaix

In the 2010s, the practice of water sports was turned upside down by the arrival of a new discipline: foiling. The number of sailors, particularly amateurs, is increasing every every year. The foil offers greater speed and height, and has therefore the accidents and injuries that result. injuries. But there are very few studies on the subject. The TRAUMAF study proposes to compare the distribution of the number of patients injured during water sports with and without the use of foils. The study also looks at patient management and the type of injury. The aim is to anticipate the management of these patients during periods of practice of these sports. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

BioEXALK is a prospective study evaluating the biological characteristics of advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with new generation TKIs in first line, included in the national EXPLORE ALK cohort (GFPC 03-2019). Explore ALK GFPC 03-2019 is a non-interventional, national, multi-center cohort of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients, whose RCB reference is 2020-A00771-38 and which obtained an approval from the IDF II Ethic Committee on 25/05/2020. Biological analysis will be performed on tissue at diagnosis and at the time of disease progression when available and on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) on three timepoints (diagnosis, at first tumor evaluation and at the time of disease progression). * Tissue : RNAseq will be performed on tumor biopsy (10 slides of 5 microns) to identify the ALK fusion partner and its variant and associated co-mutations.. * ctDNA : NGS panel on DNA including a large panel of fusions and mutations will be performed on blood samples (30mL on EDTA or STRECKs tubes) at diagnosis, at the time of the first evaluation and at the time of progression). For plasma testing, after obtained patient consent, blood samples (35mL on EDTA or STRECKs tubes) at diagnosis, at the first evaluation and at disease progression will be taken. The ALKis include alectinib and brigatinib as first-line therapy or other drugs with marketing authorizations (lorlatinib, entrectinib) or in early access programs (EAPs). Liquid biopsies will be analyzed with a NGS panel allowing the identification of ALK fusion partners and resistance mechanisms (mutations, fusions, copy number variations). Samples will be sent for centralized analysis to the Léon Bérard Center (Lyon). For biological analysis on tissue obtained at diagnosis, the ALK fusion partner and its variant will be identified by RNAseq. Whenever a tissue re-biopsy is performed at the time of disease progression as part of the standard of care management of the patient, the remaining tissue sample will be collected as part of the BioExALK study, so that RNAseq analysis will be performed to look for resistance mechanisms. Tissue samples (10 slides of 5 microns) will be sent for centralized analysis to the Rouen University Hospital.

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are frequent and chronic myeloid malignancies including Polycythemia Vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) and Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (PreMF). These MPNs are caused by the acquisition of mutations affecting activation/proliferation pathways in hematopoietic stem cells. The principal mutations are JAK2V617F, calreticulin (CALR exon 9) and MPL W515. ET or MFP/PreMF patients who do not carry one of these three mutations are declared as triple-negative (3NEG) cases even if they are real MPN cases. These diseases are at high risk of thrombo-embolic complications and with high morbidity/mortality. This risk varies from 4 to 30% depending on MPN subtype and mutational status. In terms of therapy, all patients with MPNs should also take daily low-dose aspirin (LDA) as first antithrombotic drug, which is particularly efficient to reduce arterial but not venous events. Despite the association of a cytoreductive drug and LDA, thromboses still occur in 5-8% patients/year. All these situations have been explored in biological or clinical assays. All of them could increase the bleeding risk. We should look at different ways to reduce the thrombotic incidence: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)? In the general population, in medical or surgical contexts, DOACs have demonstrated their efficiency to prevent or cure most of the venous or arterial thrombotic events. At the present time, DOAC can be used in cancer populations according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) recommendations, except in patients with cancer at high bleeding risk (gastro-intestinal or genito-urinary cancers). Unfortunately, in trials evaluating DOAC in cancer patients, most patients have solid rather than hematologic cancers (generally less than 10% of the patients, mostly lymphoma or myeloma). In cancer patients, DOAC are also highly efficient to reduce the incidence of thrombosis (-30 to 60%), but patients are exposed to a higher hemorrhagic risk, especially in digestive cancer patients. In the cancer population, pathophysiology of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events may be quite different between solid cancers and MPN. If MPN patients are also considered to be cancer patients in many countries, the pathophysiology of thrombosis is quite specific (hyperviscosity, platelet abnormalities, clonality, specific cytokines…) and they are exposed to a lower risk of digestive hemorrhages. It is thus difficult to extend findings from the "general cancer population" to MPN patients. Unfortunately, only scarce, retrospective data regarding the use of DOAC in MPNs are available data. We were the first to publish a "real-life" study about the use, the impact, and the risks in this population. In this local retrospective study, 25 patients with MPN were treated with DOAC for a median time of 2.1 years. We observed only one thrombosis (4%) and three major hemorrhages (12%, after trauma or unprepared surgery). Furthermore, we have compared the benefit/risk balance compared to patients treated with LDA without difference. With the increasing evidences of efficacy and tolerance of DOAC in large cohorts of patients including cancer patients, with their proven efficacy on prevention of both arterial and venous thrombotic events and because of the absence of prospective trial using these drugs in MPN patients, we propose to study their potential benefit as primary thrombotic prevention in MPN.

Vestibular neuritis is a brutal and continuous dizzying syndrome of peripheral (vestibular) origin without cochlear or other associated involvement. Specifically, vestibular neuritis is inflammation of the nerve that innervates the vestibular canals (the inner ear). It is characterized by the sudden onset of intense and prolonged vertigo accompanied by postural imbalance, nausea and vomiting, without hearing impairment or other neurological symptoms. Vestibular neuritis is the second cause of peripheral vertigo after benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. It represents approximately 7% of patients consulting for vertigo. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if wearing Boarding Ring glasses can be accelerated vestibular compensation.

This is a multicenter, prospective, controlled, randomized in 2 parrallel arms, double blind study. The Infants will be included after written informed consent will be obtained from the patients' parents or legally authorized representatives. Patients will be randomized either in the experimental group (electrodialyzed seawater) or in the control group (saline solution). Patients' parents will be call by phone at day 1, day 3, day 6, day 10 and day 21 after baseline.

Sedation-analgesia is used in most patients treated with mechanical ventilation (MV). The usual benzodiazepine and morphine sedation reduces pain and anxiety and allows tolerance of invasive procedures in intensive care. These molecules, used as part of the sedation titration protocol or the daily sedation stop protocol, have improved patient outcomes. Although necessary, these drugs, by mechanisms still uncertain, would promote the occurrence of resuscitation delirium. Delirium itself responsible for worsening morbidity and mortality (increase in the duration of MV, increase in the length of hospital stay, discussed increase in mortality, long-term cognitive sequelae). This finding favored the use of new drugs in the sedation strategies of patients on MV. Dexmedetomidine has for example reduced the number of days of delirium, the number of days of coma and even mortality in septic patients. Its large-scale use has however been questioned by a recent study. Halogenated gases have been used for a long time in anesthesia. Their pharmacodynamics, their positive and adverse effects, their therapeutic margins are well known. Thanks to technical innovations they can be used on resuscitation respirators. Several studies on targeted populations have shown the feasibility and the benefits of this use, in particular, the absence of accumulation, the absence of tachyphylaxis, the broad therapeutic range, the small interindividual variation, the rapidity of efficacy and the speed of awakening. Safety in use for the staff in charge of the patient is established. In addition, their potential neuroprotective effect would make it an anesthetic of choice in the prevention of resuscitation delirium.

At the age of 17, in Brittany, 94.9% of adolescents have experimented alcohol consumption 78.1% within a month and 25.5% report repeated episodes of Intensive Punctual Alcohol. Among the potential explanatory factors of this worrying epidemiology, social and cultural factors induce a social valuation of alcohol consumption and drunkenness. There are also individual vulnerability factors, particularly important in adolescence between experimentation and the transition to regular use or even to alcohol use disorders. Despite the extent of the damage, there is currently little reliable data on effective primary prevention strategies for dealing with addictive behavior. Many prevention programs target age range in school settings, to delay or reduce use of psychoactive substances. A meta-analysis on the impact of this prevention programs in school settings, concluded that most interventions are associated with no or little impact with respect to the goal of reducing psychoactive substances with teenagers. Among existing programs, "PREVENTURE" has been evaluated in 5 trials with high-risk teenagers identified in schools settings, in different countries (Canada, Europe). The results show a clear and robust effect on reducing alcohol consumption. This program has not been tested outside the school setting and a recent review mention the need to make this program more accessible by targeting vulnerable groups and studying the impact of this program on this population. The PREVADO study is a prospective, controlled, randomised, open-label study. After inclusion, the adolescent completes the questionnaire SURPS (Substance Use Risk Profile Scale). The SURPS is self-report questionnaire that assesses four well-validated personality risk factors for substance misuse (Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking, Anxiety Sensitivity, and Hopelessness). There is a 23-item to which adolescents are asked to respond using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" : Hopelessness (7 items), Anxiety Sensitivity (5 items), Impulsivity (5 items), and Sensation Seeking (6 items). Adolescents will be randomized into 2 groups (stratification on the 4 predominant risk personality types from the SURPS (Substance Use Risk Profile Scale) and on the recruitment modality) : * Intervention group : teenagers follow the "PREVENTURE" program and routine cares * Control group : teenagers follow routine cares

It is a PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open trial with a Blind Evaluation) study, in which the primary endpoint will be assessed at week-52 by an independent physician blinded to the participant's allocation group. The target population is adult patients initiating a first sequence of long term corticosteroid therapy, to the exception of onco-hematological indications, severe chronic renal failure and organ transplant. Patients in both groups will have baseline and week-52 standardized visits including clinical evaluation, routine biology, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quality of life assessment (SF-36). Corticosteroid consumption will be collected throughout the study using a dedicated notebook. At the week-52 visit, the burden of adverse events related to the use of corticosteroids will be assessed through the glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI), completed by the blinded physician.

Management of hemopathies has progressed with the arrival of new drugs such as CAR T-cells (Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells), immunotherapy and targeted therapies, while increasing emphasis is being placed on outpatient care. The emergence of oral therapies has simplified the treatment pathway, but they are not without their undesirable effects, which can sometimes lead to treatment suspension or even discontinuation. These undesirable effects may be related either to the haemopathy (pain, general signs, fatigue, malnutrition, infection, etc.), or to the toxicity of the treatments, or to co-morbidities. It is therefore essential to detect and manage these adverse effects in real time. In patients treated with oral therapy, poor compliance (\<80% of doses taken) can have a direct impact on progression-free survival and sometimes on overall survival (Dashputre et al, Williams et al). It is therefore imperative for patients to follow prescribed treatments correctly, and for doctors to check for the absence of side-effects that could adversely affect patient safety and quality of life. Monitoring of these side effects varies from one center to another: it can be "classic", with a call from the patient or GP in the event of an event; it can be telephone-based (AMA-type coordination nurse for Ambulatory Medical Assistance); and finally, it can be electronic via a remote monitoring application. Monitoring by electronic application has been evaluated in oncology, with a benefit on early detection of side effects or signs of disease progression The human resources and organization of hematology departments are highly heterogeneous, and few studies have been carried out for patients treated long-term (≥ 6 months) with oral therapy. For these patients, therapeutic compliance is one of the parameters to be assessed, in order to optimize dose-intensity and duration of response. We propose here to compare two types of follow-up for patients due to start oral therapy: standard follow-up and follow-up by electronic application (Cureety).

Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a common and serious disease. Indeed, the annual incidence is 1/1000 patients per year and the 3-month mortality is 10%, which is twice that of myocardial infarction. The treatment is based on anticoagulation for at least 3 months. However, after three or six months of anticoagulation, persistent dyspnea and impairment of quality of life are observed in at least 30% of cases. Several mechanisms explain dyspnea and impairment of quality of life after PE, such as residual pulmonary artery obstruction, exercise deconditioning, depressive syndrome or development of a cardio-respiratory pathology. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be effective on dyspnea and quality of life and is included in the therapeutic management of chronic respiratory diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, PR is also used after a myocardial infarction. However, PR after PE is still not included in therapeutic management of PE while outpatient management is recommended for the majority of patients after an acute PE episode. Study hypothesis is that PR has the potential to improve quality of life and dyspnea perception in patients who have received anticoagulation for at least 3 months after PE and who present an impairment of quality of life and/or a persistent dyspnea. This study presents several innovative aspects. First, to our knowledge, This study is the first large randomized trial assessing PR at least 3 months after acute symptomatic PE. Only one small randomized trial on 18 patients evaluating the impact of PR after PE has been published; as PR was performed just after the acute phase of PE in this trial, the clinical status improvement observed in this study could not be explained by PR alone, but also by anticoagulation. In this study, the investigators will include 112 patients at least 3 months after PE in order to exclude the bias related to anticoagulation effect. Second, This study is the first large randomized trial. Third, this study is the first that have the potential to demonstrate efficacy and safety of delayed PR after PE in patients with impaired quality of life due to persistent residual dyspnea.