Paris

The CALMDOWN trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, comparative, controlled trial randomizing patients who received near apneic ventilation vs usual care on ECMO (ultra-protective lung ventilation). The study goal is to investigate the benefit of early apneic ventilation in the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rescued by ECMO. Indeed, our hypothesis is that that early (near) apneic ventilation on venovenous ECMO for severe ARDS can enhance ventilator injury prevention and therefore reduce ECMO duration and mortality at Day 60.

This is an open-label, two-part Phase 2 study investigating CGT9486 for the treatment of patients with Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis (AdvSM), including patients with Aggressive SM (ASM), SM with Associated Hematologic Neoplasm (SM-AHN), and Mast Cell Leukemia (MCL).

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2/3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of elenestinib (BLU-263) + symptom directed therapy (SDT) with placebo + SDT in participants with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) whose symptoms are not adequately controlled by SDT. Parts 1 and 2 will enroll participants with ISM. Participants enrolled in Part 2 will roll over onto Part 3 to receive treatment with elenestinib in an open-label fashion following completion of the earlier Part. Part K will enroll participants with ISM who have previously received an approved selective KIT inhibitor. The study also includes pharmacokinetic (PK) groups that will enroll participants with ISM.

Phase 2 multi-center open-label IDE196 study in patients with primary uveal melanoma (UM) requiring either enucleation or plaque brachytherapy. Patients will be treated in neoadjuvant setting up to 12 months (or maximum benefit) followed by primary local therapy. An additional 6 months of adjuvant treatment may be given to some patients. All patients will have long term follow-up (up to 3 years) to assess visual outcome, disease recurrence, and development of metastatic disease.

1.0 Hypothesis for the study Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France). In children with no prior urological malformation, the global clinical and microbiological cure rate after antibiotic treatment completion is around 95%. Recurrence occurs in less than 5% of cases in the 3 months following AP. Renal scarring, when documented, concerns 15% of children 6 months after treatment. Renal scarring can be associated with chronic renal disease. The investigators hypothesize that 3 days of IV treatment is equivalent to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy to prevent long-term renal scarring. The investigators also hypothesize that while achieving equivalent clinical and microbiological success, and prevention of re-infections in the following 3 months, 3 days of IV treatment reduces the risk of acquisition of resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and increases the gut microbotia diversity compared to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy. 2.0 Description of knowledge relating to the condition in question Acute pyelonephritis (AP) is the most common proven bacterial infection in pediatric clinical practice. It can lead to sepsis or renal abscess and induce long-term complications such as renal scarring. Renal scarring during childhood can lead to hypertension or chronic renal disease at adult age, although the link between AP and chronic renal disease has not been firmly established. AP is most frequently due to Enterobacteriaceae, mainly Escherichia coli. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) now account for 5% of AP in France and represent a serious threat to public health, owing to limited therapeutic options. The overall clinical success rate in children treated for AP is around 95% and is not significantly different when ESBL-E are implicated. In children with no prior urological malformation, recurrence in the following 3 months occurs in less than 5% of cases. Antibiotic treatment decreases the risk of renal scarring, which remains important, around 15% (95% CI: 11-18) in the largest meta-analysis. Moreover, delay in treatment of AP is associated with permanent renal scarring. In children without prior urological malformation, acute complications are exceptional, even in the presence of bacteraemia. Short courses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy have proved to be as efficient as longer courses (7-14 days) of IV treatment. For children aged ≥ 1 month, oral treatment alone for 10 to 14 days has proved non inferior to initial IV antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy (total 10 to 14 days). French Paediatric guidelines recommend a short course (up to 4 days) of IV amikacin and/or ceftriaxone followed by oral therapy (total 10 days), with the possibility, for children aged \> 3 months of a 10-day course of oral cefixime \[12\]. In children initially treated IV, the oral relay occurs once the urine culture and antibiogram are available. The American Association of Pediatrics that focused on children aged 2 to 24 months recommends either an oral or a sequential IV/oral treatment for a total of 7 to 14 days, while the British NICE guidelines recommend an exclusively oral route only for children aged ≥ 3 months In practice, most centers initiate an IV treatment in a large subset of patients (ongoing practice analysis on the management of AP in children in France, personal data, to be published in 2021). An initial IV treatment is particularly used in young children, with an age cut-off varying between 3 months and 3 years according to the center. It is also used to secure the absorption of the treatment if the child vomits, is unable to take oral antibiotics or is severely unwell. The excellent short-term and the good long-term clinical outcomes in children treated for AP questions the need for a 10-day course of antibiotics. In adults, shorter treatments, such as amikacin for 5 days, have been validated for the treatment of uncomplicated AP. Recently published studies (Zaoutis 2023, Montini 2024) have compared a 5-day oral treatment vs 10-day oral treatment for AP in children. However, the first study (Zaoutis 2023) mainly included (63%) children with a non-febrile urinary tract infection (ie not an AP). The second only included children aged \> 3 month. A practice survey conducted prior to our protocol had shown that many departments were already reluctant to treat infants under 1 year old, and particularly those under 3 months old, by oral route, warranting clinical trials including children \< 3 month old. Third-generation cephalosporins (3GC), such as ceftriaxone, rapidly reduce the richness and diversity of the gut microbiota and also select subpopulations of resistant bacteria, particularly by acquisition of extended spectrum beta-lactamases, a major public health issue. There is no data on the impact of antibiotic relays on the gut microbiota. Since each antibiotic has its own anti-bacterial spectrum, a sequence of treatments could have an additive or even synergistic deleterious effect on the gut microbiota. This may in particular be the case in children treated with IV ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by cotrimoxazole for 7 days, as recommended in France in first intention. 3.0 Summary of relevant pre-clinical experiments and clinical trials 1999 Hoberman et al. Oral versus initial intravenous therapy for urinary tract infections in young febrile children This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 14 days and intravenous ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days. One of the outcomes was the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 24 months. A total of 306 children were included. Renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously. The study conclude that oral treatment was safe. The main limit of the study was the lower rate of renal scar in both arms compared to other studies, probably linked to a female/male sex ratio of 9:1 (with a median age of 8 months), when the sex ratio is in favour of boys before 1-year-old. 2007, Montini et al. Antibiotic treatment for pyelonephritis in children: multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial This was a multicentre, randomised controlled, open labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial comparing oral co-amoxiclav for 10 days to parenteral ceftriaxone for three days, followed by oral co-amoxiclav for 7 days. Primary outcome was the rate of renal scarring after 12 months. A total of 502 children aged 1 month to \<7 years with clinical pyelonephritis were included. Intention to treat analysis showed no significant differences between oral (n=244) and parenteral (n=258) treatment, both in the primary outcome (scarring scintigraphy at 12 months 27/197 (13.7%) v 36/203 (17.7%), and secondary outcomes: time to defervescence, white cell count at day 3, and percentage with sterile urine at day 3 (99.5% n both arms). The results were similar in the subgroups of children older and younger than 2 years (data not shown in the paper). 2012, Boquet et al. Randomized trial of oral versus sequential IV/oral antibiotic for acute pyelonephritis in children PHRC AOM 04 105; NCT00136656 This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 10 days and IV ceftriaxone for 4 days followed by oral cefixime for 6 days on the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 36 mont with a first proven urinary tract infection and procalcitonin concentration ≥ 0.5 ng/mL s. The primary endpoint was the proportion of renal scar measured by 99mTc-DMSA renal scintigraphy 6 to 8 months after treatment. The study included a total 171 children of the 698 expected. The incidence of renal scarring was 30.8% in the oral treatment group and 27.3% for children who received the sequential treatment. The trial could not demonstrate statistically the non-inferiority due to insufficient enrolment. 2023, Zaoutis et al. Short-Course Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Children: The SCOUT Randomized Clinical Trial PMID: 37358858 ; NCT01595529, This was a randomized clinical noninferiority trial at 2 children's hospitals. Participants included children aged 2 months to 10 years with UTI exhibiting clinical improvement after 5 days of antimicrobials. The study compared another 5 days of antimicrobials (standard-course therapy) or 5 days of placebo (short-course therapy). The primary outcome, treatment failure, was defined as symptomatic UTI at or before the first follow-up visit (day 11 to 14 A total of 664 children were randomized (639 female \[96%\]; median age, 4 years): 2 of 328 assigned to standard-course (0.6%) and 14 of 336 assigned to short-course (4.2%) had a treatment failure. There were no differences between groups in rates of UTI after the first follow-up visit, incidence of adverse events, or incidence of gastrointestinal colonization with resistant organisms. 2024, Montini et al. Short Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Pediatric febrile Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Trial. \[25\] PMID: 38146260 This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. We randomly assigned children aged 3 months to 5 years with a noncomplicated fUTI to receive amoxicillin-clavulanate for 5 or 10 days. The primary end point was the recurrence of a urinary tract infection within 30 days after the completion of therapy. Secondary end points were the difference in prevalence of clinical recovery, adverse drug-related events, and resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and/or to other antibiotics when a recurrent infection occurred. The study included a total of,175 children and 142 underwent randomization. The recurrence rate of UTI within 30 days of the end of therapy was 2.8% (2/72) in the short group and 14.3% (10/70) in the standard group. The recurrence rate of fUTI within 30 days from the end of therapy was 1.4% (1/72) in the short group and 5.7% (4/70) in the standard group.

After being informed about the study. All patients giving written informed consent will undergo in a routine practice: 1. echocardiography (2D/3D), 2. CMR imaging, 3. electrocardiogram 24 hours monitoring, 4. blood sampling including brain natriuretic peptide measurement, 5. symptom-limited combined exercise echocardiography and oxygen uptake measurements

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) complicates 3% of pregnancies and accounts for one-third of preterm births. It is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity and increases the risk of maternal infectious morbidity. In cases of early PPROM (22 to 33 completed weeks' gestation), expectant management is recommended in the absence of labor, chorioamnionitis or fetal distress. Antenatal steroids and antibiotics administration are recommended by international guidelines. However, there is no recommendation regarding tocolysis administration in the setting of PPROM. In theory, reducing uterine contractility should delay delivery and reduce the risks of prematurity and neonatal adverse consequences. Likewise, a prolongation of gestation may allow administering a corticosteroids complete course that is associated with a two-fold reduction of morbidity and mortality. However, tocolysis may prolong fetal exposure to inflammation and be associated with higher risk of materno-fetal infection, potentially associated with neonatal death or long-term sequelae, including cerebral palsy. The investigators implemented the TOCOPROM randomized clinical trial to assess whether short-term (48 hr) tocolysis reduces perinatal morti-morbidity in cases of PPROM at 22-33 weeks. However, both short- and long-term outcomes should be taken into account to define the optimal treatment strategy. There are currently no data allowing to evaluate the impact of a short course of nifedipine versus placebo on neurodevelopmental outcomes in school-aged children born after PPROM. Therefore, following-up children born to mothers enrolled in the TOCOPROM trial, through a new study, the TOCOKIDS cohort, is a unique and timely opportunity to advance scientific knowledge and adapt clinical practices in France and worldwide. The assessment at 6 years of age will consist in: * A self-administered parental questionnaire, completed online or on paper * Data collected from the health book, in particular the 6-year consultation * A short psychological assessment (45 minutes), performed remotely by a psychologist through video conference.

Prospective multicenter study evaluating the prediction of histological response of pembrolizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy by pre-treatment 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging in patients with early-stage high-risk TNBC. Patients will receive the newly established standard of care of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W given with 4 cycles of paclitaxel + carboplatin, then with 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. After definitive surgery, patients will receive adjuvant pembrolizumab for 9 cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. The 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT scan will be performed for each patient pre-therapy and on the same machine as the 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and within 14 days before the start of treatment.

Litifilimab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody targeting blood dendritic cell antigen 2. It is an inhibitory receptor expressed on the surface of human plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDCs) and is being investigated for the potential treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus and cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing skin disease activity measured by the CLA-IGA-R score \[Parts A\] and the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) score \[Part B\] in participants with active SCLE and/or CCLE with or without systemic manifestations and refractory and/or intolerant to antimalarials. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of litifilimab in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity by CLA-IGA-R, CLASI-A; to evaluate additional efficacy parameters of litifilimab in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity; safety; tolerability; and immunogenicity of litifilimab \[Parts A and B\].

The patient will have 7 visits. After Confirmation of inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria, the study will be explain to the patient after signing the inform consent and be included in the study Treatment Period (Period 1); challenge period This period will be the first treatment period that will occur from 8 weeks. During this period the patient will see the doctor at the hospital, he will perform the study procedures The second period : dechallenge (period 2): All patients stop their treatment for 4 weeks. The second treatment period - rechallenge (period 3) the patient will take the treatment for a second 8 weeks period At week 20 - End of study At each visit: The investigator at each visit compliance to the treatment and adverse events, Measure vital signs and perform clinical examination. The patient will assess the different questionnaires, for the study